ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2482

The Use of Any Conventional Synthetic DMARD Is Associated with Better Indexes of the Physical Component Evaluated By 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey : Analysis of a Cohort of RA Patients

Alisson Pugliesi1, Eduardo de Almeida Macedo2, Manoel Barros Bertolo3, Rina Dalva Neubarth Giorgi4, Sebastião Radominski5, Ivânio Alves Pereira6, Maria Fernanda Brandao de Resende Guimarães7, Paulo Louzada Junior8, Maria de Fátima da Cunha Sauma9, Karina Bonfiglioli10, Claiton Brenol11, Lícia M. H. Mota12 and Geraldo Castelar Pinheiro13, 1INTERNAL MEDICINE, DISCIPLINE OF RHEUMATOLOGY, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), CAMPINAS, Brazil, 2Internal Medicine, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil, 3University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil, 4Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, 5Unversidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil, 6Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil, 7Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil, 8Universidade de São Paulo - Ribeirão Preto, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil, 9Universdade Federal do Pará, Belém, Brazil, 10Rheumatology Division, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 11Rua Cabral, 764 – Apto 302, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil, 12Hospital Universitário de Brasília - UnB, Brasília, Brazil, 13Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: quality of life and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Diagnosis, Manifestations, and Outcomes Poster III: Complications of Therapy, Outcomes, and Measures

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) report a reduction in quality of life (QoL) in several aspects when compared to the healthy population. QoL can be evaluated by the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12), a questionnaire that considers the individual’s perception of their health in the last 4 weeks and, through a specific algorithm, measures two scores: Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS). The score of both ranges from 0 to 100, and higher scores are associated with better QoL indexes. In the present study, we related clinical, laboratory and therapeutic aspects of a large RA cohort with the PCS indexes of SF-12.

Methods: A prospective multicenter cohort study involving 13 centers specialized in the care of patients with RA. All patients underwent at least 3 clinical evaluations over a 12-month period. Only patients older than 18 years and classified as having RA according to the criteria of 1987 (ACR) or 2010 (ACR/EULAR) were evaluated. SF-12 was used to assess QoL, and only the components relevant to the PCS were considered. The comparison between groups was performed using the Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests.

 

Results: A total of 1,116 patients (89.43% females, mean age 58 ± 11 years) participated in the study. Patients with erosive disease presented lower PCS score (p = 0.0004) than those without this characteristic. Regarding medications, the use of at least one conventional synthetic DMARD is associated with a higher score (p = 0.0004); the use of at least one biologic or targeted-synthetic DMARD is associated with a lower score (p = 0.0142); and the use of abatacept and tocilizumab is associated with a lower score (p = 0.0276 and p = 0.0116, respectively). In a linear regression model (p < 0.0001), it was found that the patient with the highest score of SF-12 physical component is the one using a synthetic DMARD (p = 0.0016) and not using tocilizumab (p = 0.0374) and abatacept (p = 0.0151). The results are summarized in Table 1.

 

Conclusion: The best QoL indexes observed in patients using any conventional synthetic DMARD reinforce the importance of this class of medications in the treatment of RA. The results obtained with non-anti-TNF biologic DMARDs may reflect the usual choice of these drugs as third-line therapy.

 

 

Table 1 – Measures of position and dispersion of the physical component of 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey and result of the comparison between Kruskal-Wallis (K) and Mann-Whitney (M) groups.

Variable

Category

N

p-value

Rheumatoid factor

titration

High

598

0.5903K

Low

242

Negative

222

Anti-CCP titration

High

275

0.7524K

Low

84

Negative

108

Erosive disease

No

478

0.0004M

Yes

584

Methotrexate

No

366

0.0806M

Yes

714

Leflunomide

No

716

0.7090M

Yes

364

Hydroxychloroquine

No

961

0.7193M

Yes

119

Sulfasalazine

No

1,027

0.1165M

Yes

53

Conventional synthetic DMARD

No

113

0.0004M

Yes

967

Adalimumab

No

1,031

0.5650M

Yes

49

Infliximab

No

1,034

0.6239M

Yes

46

Etanercept

No

1,017

0.6239M

Yes

63

Certolizumab

No

1,064

0.4976M

Yes

16

Golimumab

No

1,045

0.8640M

Yes

35

Tocilizumab

No

1,025

0.0276M

Yes

55

Abatacept

No

1,011

0.0116M

Yes

69

Rituximab

No

1,032

0.9938M

Yes

48

Tofacitinib

No

1,071

0.7569M

Yes

9

Biologic or targeted-synthetic DMARD

No

690

0.0142M

Yes

390

K: Kruskal-Wallis test; M: Mann-Whitney test; conventional synthetic DMARD: at least one between methotrexate, leflunomide, hydroxychloroquine and sulfasalazine; biologic DMARD: at least one between adalimumab, infliximab, etanercept, certolizumab, golimumab, tocilizumab, abatacept, rituximab and tofacitinib.


Disclosure: A. Pugliesi, Pfizer, Inc. Apsen, Roche, Janssen, 8; E. D. A. Macedo, None; M. B. Bertolo, None; R. Dalva Neubarth Giorgi, UCB, Lilly, Pfizer, Janssen, Roche, 5, 8; S. Radominski, None; I. Alves Pereira, None; M. F. B. D. R. Guimarães, None; P. Louzada Junior, None; M. D. F. da Cunha Sauma, None; K. Bonfiglioli, Roche, Janssen, Pfizer, Abbvie, 5; C. Brenol, None; L. M. H. Mota, Abbvie, Janssen, Pfizer, Roche and UCB, 5, 8; G. Castelar Pinheiro, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Pugliesi A, Macedo EDA, Bertolo MB, Dalva Neubarth Giorgi R, Radominski S, Alves Pereira I, Guimarães MFBDR, Louzada Junior P, da Cunha Sauma MDF, Bonfiglioli K, Brenol C, Mota LMH, Castelar Pinheiro G. The Use of Any Conventional Synthetic DMARD Is Associated with Better Indexes of the Physical Component Evaluated By 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey : Analysis of a Cohort of RA Patients [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-use-of-any-conventional-synthetic-dmard-is-associated-with-better-indexes-of-the-physical-component-evaluated-by-12-item-short-form-health-survey-analysis-of-a-cohort-of-ra-patients/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-use-of-any-conventional-synthetic-dmard-is-associated-with-better-indexes-of-the-physical-component-evaluated-by-12-item-short-form-health-survey-analysis-of-a-cohort-of-ra-patients/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology