ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1428

The Safety and Efficacy Of Tocilizumab Subcutaneous In Combination With Traditional Dmards In Patients With Moderate To Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis Up To 48 Weeks (BREVACTA)

Alan Kivitz1, Ewa Olech2, Michael A. Borofsky3, Beatriz M. Zazueta4, Federico Navarro-Sarabia5, Sebastião C. Radominski6, Joan T. Merrill7, Chris Wells8, Sunethra Wimalasundera8, Wendy Douglass8 and Janet E. Pope9, 1Altoona Center for Clinical Research, Duncansville, PA, 2Internal Medicine, University of Nevada School of Medicine, Las Vegas, NV, 3Clinical Research Center of Reading, Reading, PA, 4Reumatologia, Centro de Investigacion en Enfermedades Reumaticas, Mexicali, Mexico, 5Rheumatology, Hospital Virgen Macarena, Serv. de Reumatología, Sevilla, Spain, 6Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil, 7Clinical Pharmacology Research Program, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK, 8Roche, Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom, 9Rheumatology, St Joseph Health Centre, London, ON, Canada

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Tocilizumab

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy II

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: The BREVACTA study assessed the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous tocilizumab (TCZ-SC) in pts with moderate to severe RA who had an inadequate response to ≥ 1 DMARD (21% had failed an antiTNF). The primary objective of the study was to assess efficacy and safety up to week 24; as reported previously, superiority over placebo was demonstrated, with a safety profile comparable to intravenous TCZ (TCZ IV). Here we report the longer-term efficacy and safety data for TCZ SC administration to Week 48.

Methods: This phase 3, randomized, multicenter, parallel-arm study included a 24 week double-blind, PBO controlled period followed by open label treatment for 72 weeks and 8 weeks of safety follow up. Pts were randomized 2:1 to receive TCZ SC 162 mg every 2 weeks (q2w) or PBO SC q2w via a pre-filled syringe (PFS), in combination with stable doses of pre-study DMARD(s). Escape therapy with TCZ SC qw (PFS) was available from week 12. At week 24, pts remaining on q2w therapy in both arms were re-randomized 1:1 to receive open-label TCZ SC q2w via PFS or Autoinjector Pen. The data presented here focuses on pts who received TCZ SC from baseline to week 48, regardless of injection device used.  Efficacy was  assessed  to week 48. Safety was assessed to 29 October 2012 (when all pts had reached ≥ week 48) using AE reports and laboratory data.

Results: 437 pts were randomized at baseline to receive TCZ SC q2w, with 334 (76%) re-randomized at week 24 to continue to receive TCZ SC q2w in the open-label phase. Efficacy was maintained to week 48, with the proportion of pts with ACR20/50/70 responses, in clinical remission (DAS28 < 2.6) and with a clinically meaningful improvement in physical function (change from baseline in HAQ-DI ≥ 0.3) remaining stable or improving from week 24 to 48 (table). Mean reduction in radiographic progression of structural joint damage (measured as change in modified Total Sharp Score, mTSS) was also maintained from week 24 to 48. The rates of AEs and SAEs, including serious infections, remained stable or decreased between weeks 24 and 48. The most common AEs were infections, particularly respiratory ones. No anaphylaxis or medically confirmed serious hypersensitivity occured. The most common injection site reactions were erythema, pain and pruritis. Ten pts developed antiTCZ antibodies postbaseline, but did not experience loss of efficacy or clinically significant or serious hypersensitivity. A total of 21 pts withdrew from TCZ SC due to AEs, most commonly due to infections or elevated liver enzymes. Six pts died up to the week 48 cut-off. 

Conclusion: TCZ SC demonstrated long term efficacy, including sustained ACR response rates and reduced progression of joint damage over 48 weeks. There was no change in the AE profile for TCZ SC compared with earlier evaluations. TCZ SC is an effective treatment in RA, and will offer an alternative route of administration and the possibility of self-administration for pts.

TCZ SC q2w

24 weeks

TCZ SC q2w

48 weeks

Patient disposition (ITT population)

Randomized, n

437

–

Re-randomized at week 24, n (%)

334 (76)

–

Withdrew from TCZ SC q2w regimen, n (%)

26 (6)

46 (11)

Received escape therapy with TCZ SC qw regimena, n (%)

71 (16)

77 (18)

Withdrew from escape therapy, n (%)

2 (<1)

3 (<1)

Completed treatment periodb, n (%)

340 (78)

314 (72)

Efficacy (ITT population)

N

437

437

ACR20, %

61

62

ACR50, %

40

45

ACR70, %

20

26

DAS28 < 2.6, %

32

45

Decrease in HAQ-DI ≥ 0.3 from baseline, %

58

62

Change in modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) from baselinec, mean±SD

0.62 ± 2.692

0.64 ± 3.266

Safety (safety populationd)

N

437

437

Patient years of exposure

182.68

393.53

Total AEs, n

803

1472

Rate of AEs per 100 patient years

439.56

374.05

Total SAEs, n

25

51

Rate of SAEs per 100 patient years

13.68

12.96

Total serious infections, n

12

15

Rate of serious infections per 100 patient years

6.57

3.81

Clinically significant hypersensitivity reactionse, n

2

3

Rate of clinically significant hypersensitivity reactions per 100 patient yearse

1.09

0.76

Injection site reactionsf, n

57

97

Rate of injection site reactions per 100 patient yearsf

31.20

24.65

Confirmation assay positive anti-TCZ antibodies, n

7

10

Withdrawals due to AEs, n

9

21

Deaths, n

3

6

a Escape therapy with weekly open-label TCZ SC 162 mg was offered from week 12 to 48 to pts with less than 20% improvement from baseline in both their tender and swollen joint count, and from week 48 onwards to pts with less than 70% improvement in both their tender and swollen joint count. Escape pts were not rerandomized to PFS or AI at week 24, and remained on TCZ SC qw using the PFS for the remainder of the study. The number of pts who received escape therapy includes pts who subsequently withdrew from escape therapy.

b Number of pts who completed the TCZ SC q2w regimen to week 24 and week 48, excluding pts who withdrew or received escape therapy with TCZ SC qw.

c Mean change in mTSS at week 24 was 0.62 ± 2.692 for TCZ SC vs 1.23 ± 2.816 for placebo (P = 0.0149), and at week 48 was 0.64 ± 3.266 for TCZ SC vs. 1.48 ± 3.804 for pts who switched from placebo to TCZ SC at week 24.

d 29 Oct 2012 was the clinical cut-off for week 48.  At this time point, the majority of pts had received TCZ SC for longer than 48 weeks.

e Events that occurred during or within 24 hours of an injection (excluding ISRs) that were not deemed unrelated to treatment and led to withdrawal.

f AEs occurring at the site of a SC injection as recorded by the investigator.


Disclosure:

A. Kivitz,

AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Celgene, Genentech, Janssen, Pfizer, UCB,

2,

BMS, Genentech, UCB,

5,

BMS,

8;

E. Olech,

Genentech ,

2;

M. A. Borofsky,
None;

B. M. Zazueta,
None;

F. Navarro-Sarabia,

Roche, Pfizer, UCB, Abbott and Meiji Seika,

5,

Roche, Pfizer, UCB, Abbott and Meiji Seika,

8;

S. C. Radominski,

Pfizer, Astra Zeneca, Celltrion, Amgen, Roche, Novartis,

2,

Pfizer, Astra Zeneca, Janssen, BMS ,

5,

Pfizer, Astra Zeneca, BMS, GSK, Janssen,

8;

J. T. Merrill,

Roche, Genentech,

5;

C. Wells,

Roche Products, Ltd.,

3;

S. Wimalasundera,

Roche Pharmaceuticals,

3;

W. Douglass,

Roche Pharmaceuticals,

3;

J. E. Pope,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-safety-and-efficacy-of-tocilizumab-subcutaneous-in-combination-with-traditional-dmards-in-patients-with-moderate-to-severe-rheumatoid-arthritis-up-to-48-weeks-brevacta/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology