ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1998

The Risk Of Subsequent Attacks In Patients With Incident Gout: A Population-Based Study

Nour Zleik1, Clement J. Michet1, Helen Khun2, Cynthia S. Crowson2, Eric L. Matteson1 and Tim Bongartz1, 1Rheumatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 2Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Epidemiologic methods and gout

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Metabolic and Crystal Arthropathies II

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:

While there appears to be consensus that non-pharmacological uric acid lowering therapies (diet and lifestyle modifications) should be initiated in every patient presenting with gout, there is much less agreement as to when urate lowering drugs should be considered. Expert opinion ranges from starting uric acid lowering therapy after the first attack of gouty arthritis through a more cautious approach where therapy is only started in patients with more than 3 attacks per year.  We aimed to assemble a population based cohort of patients with newly diagnosed gout to determine the risk of additional flares after an initial gout attack and explore the role of various demographic, clinical and laboratory predictors that may aid the clinician in quantifying this risk.

Methods:

We examined a population-based incidence cohort of patients with gout, diagnosed according to the New York, Rome or ACR preliminary criteria in Rochester, Minnesota, between Jan 1st 1989 and Dec 31st 1992. All subjects were followed longitudinally through their complete community medical records, until death, migration or July 1st 2012. We used descriptive statistics to delineate the frequency and number of subsequent flares of gouty arthritis in our cohort. In addition, we utilized a conditional frailty model (accounting for multiple flares per subject) to explore risk factors of subsequent flares after an initial diagnosis of gout.

Results:

158 patients with incident gout were identified among Rochester residents within the 4 year time period. Subjects were followed for a mean (SD) of 13.4 (8.5) years. The majority of patients were male (73.4%) and the mean age (SD) at gout onset was 59.2.0 (17.8).  Isolated podagra was the most common form of joint involvement at disease onset (74.7%) and the mean (SD) serum uric acid level was 8.1 (1.6) mg/dl. 111 patients (70.3%) developed at least 1 subsequent flare, with a total of 381 subsequent flares during the entire follow-up period. Patients with the highest risk of subsequent flares had an initial joint involvement other than first MTP joint (odds ratio 1.5, 95% CI 1.1, 2.2) and a high serum uric acid level at baseline (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.2, 1.5). Age, gender, BMI, alcohol consumption, lipid levels and starting uric acid lowering therapy were not significant predictors of subsequent flare risk.

Conclusion:

The majority of patients in our population-based cohort did develop at least one subsequent flare after a initial diagnosis of gout, with a 20-year cumulative incidence of more than 80 percent. Joint involvement other than the first MTP1 joint and the serum uric acid level were significant predictors of subsequent flare risk and should be taken into account when deciding on the timing of starting uric acid lowering therapy.


Disclosure:

N. Zleik,
None;

C. J. Michet,
None;

H. Khun,
None;

C. S. Crowson,
None;

E. L. Matteson,
None;

T. Bongartz,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-risk-of-subsequent-attacks-in-patients-with-incident-gout-a-population-based-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology