ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 803

The Risk Of Serious Infections In Patients Receiving Rituximab For Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results From The British Society For Rheumatology Biologics Register-Rheumatoid Arthritis

Lucía Silva-Fernández1,2, Mark Lunt3, Audrey S. Low2, Kath D. Watson3, BSRBR Control Centre Consortium2, Deborah P. Symmons2, Kimme L. Hyrich4 and On behalf of the BSRBR5, 1Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Spain, 2Arthritis Research UK Epidemiology Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom, 3Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom, 4Arthritis Research UK Epidemiology Unit, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Institute of Inflammation and Repair, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom, 5British Society for Rheumatology, London, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Infection, registries, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and rituximab

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy: Safety Issues

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: In the United Kingdom (UK), rituximab (RTX), an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, is currently used to treat patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have failed initial anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy. There is a concern over whether B-cell depletion and potential resultant hypogammaglobulinaemia may result in an increased risk of serious infections (SI). The aim of this study was to determine if RTX influences the risk of SI when used in routine clinical practice.

Methods: The British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register-RA is an ongoing national prospective cohort study of subjects with RA recently started on biologic therapy. To date, over 20000 subjects have been recruited. Patients who had failed a first anti-TNF and were switched to either a second anti-TNF or RTX between 2001-2012 were identified from the study cohort. All patients were followed by physician and patient questionnaires every six months for the first three years and annual physician questionnaires thereafter, in which data on drug therapy and serious adverse events were reported. Deaths were identified by flagging with UK National Health Service Information Centre. SIs were defined as those requiring intravenous antibiotics and/or hospitalization, or those resulting in death. Subjects were followed until 01/31/2013, first serious infection, death or treatment discontinuation allowing for a lag window (90 days after first missed dose of anti-TNF and 12 months following each course of RTX), whichever came first. The rates of SI in both cohorts (anti-TNF switched to another anti-TNF vs anti-TNF switched to RTX) were compared using Cox proportional hazards model adjusted using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) (see variables included in table).

Results: In total, 525 subjects experienced at least one SI (448 in 4048 anti-TNF treated subjects and 77 in 1433 RTX treated subjects) occurred during 14155 and 2621 person-years (pyrs) of observation respectively (incidence rate 31 versus 29 per 1000 pyrs) (Table). After adjustment using IPTW, there was a lower overall risk of SI for patients receiving rituximab than for those receiving a second anti-TNF: hazard ratio (HR) for RTX 0.50 (95% CI 0.33, 0.76). However, the median time to first SI was shorter in the RTX cohort. Analysis limited to patients who initiated their second biologic after RTX approval in 2006 gave similar results.

Second anti-TNF (n=4048) Rituximab (n=1433)
Age (years), mean (SD) 56.4 (12.3) 59.5 (11.8)
Gender: n (%) female 79.3 77
RA disease duration (years), Median (IQR) 14 (8, 21) 15 (9, 22)
DAS28 score at switch, mean (SD) 5.4 (1.5) 5.9 (1.3)
HAQ at switch, mean (SD) 1.9 (0.6) 1.9 (0.6)
Steroid use (%) 57 68
Past serious infection on initial anti-TNF therapy: n (%) 342 (8.5) 198 (19.9)
Follow-up (pyrs) 14155 2621
Median follow-up (pyrs; IQR) 2.7 (0.8, 6) 1.5 (0.8, 2.5)
Number of first serious infections 448 77
Median time to infection (years; IQR) 1.4 (0.4, 3.2) 0.5 (0.2, 1.4)
Crude incidence rate of SI per 1,000 pyrs (95% CI) 31 (28, 34) 29 (23, 36)
Unadjusted HR (95% CI) Referent 0.62 (0.49, 0.80)
Age and gender adjusted HR (95% CI) Referent 0.56 (0.44, 0.72)
Fully adjusted by IPTW HR (95% CI)* Referent 0.50 (0.33, 0.76)
*IPTW HR adjusted by age, disease duration, Disease Activity Score (DAS)-28 score and Heath Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) when initiating the second biologic, gender, smoking, use of steroids before switching to a second biologic, reason for stopping first anti-TNF, previous serious infection, number of prior disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) used before initiating biologic treatment, diabetes, lung involvement, heart disease, liver disease, renal disease, previous cancer, tuberculosis and year of starting first biologic drug.

Conclusion: The rate of SI in patients starting a second biologic is similar to that previously observed for a first anti-TNF therapy although our data suggest patients selected to switch to RTX may have a lower risk of SI compared to patients who switch to a second anti-TNF.


Disclosure:

L. Silva-Fernández,
None;

M. Lunt,
None;

A. S. Low,
None;

K. D. Watson,
None;

B. Control Centre Consortium,
None;

D. P. Symmons,
None;

K. L. Hyrich,
None;

O. B. O. T. BSRBR,

Pfizer Inc,

2,

MSD,

2,

Abbott Immunology Pharmaceuticals,

2,

UCB,

2,

Roche Pharmaceuticals,

2,

SOBI,

2.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-risk-of-serious-infections-in-patients-receiving-rituximab-for-rheumatoid-arthritis-results-from-the-british-society-for-rheumatology-biologics-register-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology