ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 356

The Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease Score Is Associated with Disease Activity By Clinical, Laboratory and Ultrasonographic Measures: Validation in an inception Cohort of DMARD naïve Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Lena Bugge Nordberg1, Elisabeth Lie2, Anna-Birgitte Aga1, Marthe Thoresen Maehlen3, Inge Olsen C4, Till Uhlig4, Tore K. Kvien4, Espen A. Haavardsholm5 and the Arctic study Group5, 1Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway, 2Dept. of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway, 3Department of rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway, 4Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway, 5Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Disease Activity, outcome measures and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), PRO

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Clinical Aspects: Novel Biomarkers and Other Measurements of Disease Activity

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

 

Background/Purpose:

The Rheumatoid arthritis impact of disease (RAID) score is a relatively new patient-derived composite score assessing the seven most important domains of the impact of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It is unknown how the RAID score correlates with other disease measures in patients with early RA. We aimed to examine associations between the RAID score and different clinical, laboratory and ultrasonographic disease measures as well as other patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in an inception cohort of DMARD naïve patients with early RA.

 

Methods:

Consecutive patients from 11 rheumatology centers in Norway who fulfilled the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for RA were included from October 2010 to April 2013. All patients had symptom duration (from first swollen joint) <2 years and were DMARD naïve with indication for DMARD treatment. Patients were stratified according to level of RAID score at baseline, and a RAID score of ≤3 was considered low, >3-6 moderate and >6 high. Disease measures were compared across RAID levels using either Kruskal-Wallis or ANOVA, and we assessed the correlation between the RAID score and other measures using Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficients, as appropriate.

 

Results:

A total of 229 patients were included, 61.1% female, 81.2% ACPA-positive and with mean (SD) age 51.0 (13.6) years. At baseline, mean (SD) RAID score was 4.5 (0.7), and 28.4%/47.6%/24.0% of the patients had low/moderate/high RAID score according to the above specified cut-offs. Differences in disease measures were all statistically significant across the low, moderate and high RAID groups, with the exception of the power Doppler ultrasonography score (table). Correlation analysis revealed statistically significant correlations between RAID score and all other measures, again with the exception of the power Doppler ultrasonography score. Correlations between RAID and Patient global, EQ-5D and Pain (VAS), respectively, were strong (r≥0.70), and the correlations between RAID and Ritchie, DAS44, Physician global, fatigue and SF-36 Physical and Mental Components Summary measures were moderate (r ≥0.4-0.7). The remaining correlations were weak (r<0.4).

 

 

Low RAID≤3,

n=65

Moderate RAID>3-6,

n=109

High RAID>6,

n=55

P

Disease duration, months*†

6.3 [3.6-12.0]

5.4 [2.7-9.8]

4.3 [2.2-9.3]

0.057

Age**

52.2 (14.4)

49.7 (13.7)

52.0 (12.5)

0.41

Female, n (%)

37 (56.9)

67 (61.5)

36 (65.5)

0.63

DAS-44**

2.71 (0.96)

3.53 (0.89)

4.27 (1.08)

<0.001

44-Swollen joint count*

7 [3-13]

9 [5-13]

12 [7-18]

0.003

ESR (mm/h)*

14 [9-26]

21 [12-30]

29 [15-45]

<0.001

CRP (mg/L)*

4 [2-7]

8  [4-18]

12 [6-28]

<0.001

Ritchie tender joint score*

4 [2-7]

8 [4-13]

12 [6-17]

<0.001

Patient global VAS (mm)**

27.9 (16.4)

48.4 (17.3)

77.2 (15.1)

<0.001

Physician global VAS (mm)**

29.6 (16.5)

41.6 (20.0)

51.4 (20.3)

<0.001

GSUS score ††

14 [9-23]

17 [10-28]

23 [16-30]

0.008

PDUS score*††

6 [2-13]

6 [3-13]

9 [4-14]

0.11

Total US score*††

20 [12-36]

24.5 [15-38]

33 [21-45]

0.015

EQ-5D (UK)*

0.76 [0.69-0.80]

0.66 [0.52-0.69]

0.06 [-0.2-0.18]

<0.001

Pain VAS (mm)**

26.5 (15.8)

45.8 (18.0)

75.6 (11.3)

<0.001

Fatigue VAS (mm)**

19.1 (20.8)

40.8 (24.9)

63.1 (24.7)

<0.001

SF-36 PCS**

43.3 (8.5)

33.9 (7.9)

23.8 (7.9)

<0.001

SF-36 MCS**

52.9 (9.3)

48.2 (10.9)

42.1 (10.3)

<0.001

*Median [25-75 percentiles]. **Mean(SD). †Time from patient reported first swollen joint. ††Ultrasonography (US) examinations were performed by experienced sonographers using a validated gray-scale (GS) and power-Doppler (PD) semi-quantitative scoring system with ranges 0-3 for GS and PD in each of the following 32 joints: MCP I-V, radio-carpal (RCJ), distal radio-ulnar (DRUJ), inter-carpal (ICJ), elbow, knee, talo-crural and MTP I-V bilaterally.

PCS = Physical Components Summary, MCS = Mental Component Summary.

Conclusion:

The RAID score was associated with both patient-reported and objective disease measures in this inception cohort of DMARD naïve RA patients. These findings support the use of RAID as a valid PROM in patients with early RA, covering a wide variety of disease manifestations and reflecting the patient perspective.

 


Disclosure:

L. B. Nordberg,
None;

E. Lie,
None;

A. B. Aga,
None;

M. T. Maehlen,
None;

I. Olsen C,
None;

T. Uhlig,
None;

T. K. Kvien,
None;

E. A. Haavardsholm,

AbbVie, Pfizer, MSD, Roche, UCB,

2;

T. A. study Group,

AbbVie, Pfizer, MSD, Roche, UCB,

2.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-rheumatoid-arthritis-impact-of-disease-score-is-associated-with-disease-activity-by-clinical-laboratory-and-ultrasonographic-measures-validation-in-an-inception-cohort-of-dmard-naive-patien/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology