ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2541

The Relationship between the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) and Disease Activity in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)

Jeanie Z. Fei1, Justine (Yang) Ye1, Anthony V. Perruccio2, Dafna D Gladman3 and Vinod Chandran4, 1University of Toronto, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada, 3Rheumatology, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 4Medicine, Krembil Research Institute, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Disease Activity and psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 7, 2017

Title: Spondyloarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis – Clinical Aspects and Treatment Poster III: Outcomes, Outcome Measures, and Comorbidities

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

PASS is the highest level of symptoms beyond which patients consider themselves well. Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) is a recently developed composite disease activity measure that summarizes a patient’s disease in a single 0-10 score. Disease Activity index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) is a score recently validated for its utilization in PsA, focusing on the evaluation of disease activity in the joints. In this study, we aimed to 1) identify the PASDAS and DAPSA cut-off points for PASS, 2) to examine the agreement between PASS and the published PASDAS thresholds for low (<3.2), moderate (3.2-5.4), and high disease activity (>5.4), and 3) to examine the agreement between PASS and the defined DAPSA thresholds for disease remission (≤4), low (>4 and ≤14), moderate (>14 and ≤28), and high (>28) disease activity.

Methods: Patients were prospectively recruited from a PsA clinic. A standard protocol including physician assessment and patient-reported outcomes was used to record variables required to calculate PASDAS and DAPSA. In addition, each patient was asked, “Think about all the ways your PsA has affected you during the last 48 hours. If you were to remain in the next few months as you were during the last 48 hours, would this be acceptable to you?” to assess PASS. For analysis, the PASDAS and DAPSA thresholds for PASS were identified using ROC curve analyses to maximize specificity and sensitivity. Furthermore, the agreement between PASS and low, moderate, and high PASDAS disease activity cut-offs; as well as between PASS and disease remission, low, moderate, and high DAPSA disease activity cut-offs were evaluated.

Results: 229 patients [58.5% male, mean age 55.5, mean disease duration 17.2 years] were recruited. 1) The PASDAS threshold for the patient acceptable symptoms state (PASS+) was identified to be 3.79 (AUC: 0.86, sensitivity 0.75, specificity 0.82), and the DAPSA threshold for PASS+ was 13.53 (AUC: 0.85, sensitivity 0.88, specificity 0.72) using ROC curve analyses. 2) When examining the agreement between PASS and PASDAS, 90.3% of patients with low disease activity considered their symptoms state acceptable compared to 55.0% with moderate disease activity and 16.7% with high disease activity. The mean difference in PASDAS between those reporting unacceptable versus acceptable PASS was significantly different (p<0.001), with mean (SD) PASDAS of 4.4 (1.0) and 2.7 (1.1), respectively. 3) With DAPSA, 97.0% of patients in disease remission considered their symptoms state acceptable compared to 89.4% with low, 45.4% with moderate, and 35.7% with high disease activity. The mean difference in DAPSA between those reporting unacceptable vs acceptable PASS was also significantly different (p<0.001), with mean (SD) DAPSA of 25.3 (16.3) and 11.6 (13.2) respectively.

Conclusion:

The PASDAS threshold for patient acceptable symptoms state is 3.79, which is within the moderate disease activity range. Meanwhile, the DAPSA threshold for patient acceptable symptoms state is 13.53, in the low disease activity range. Theses cut-offs should be considered for shared decision making regarding initiating, changing, and/or escalating treatments in PsA patients.


Disclosure: J. Z. Fei, None; J. Ye, None; A. V. Perruccio, None; D. D. Gladman, None; V. Chandran, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Fei JZ, Ye J, Perruccio AV, Gladman DD, Chandran V. The Relationship between the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) and Disease Activity in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-relationship-between-the-patient-acceptable-symptom-state-pass-and-disease-activity-in-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis-psa/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-relationship-between-the-patient-acceptable-symptom-state-pass-and-disease-activity-in-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis-psa/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology