ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 652

The Reasons for Discontinuation of Combination Therapy with Methotrexate and Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors Versus Triple Therapy Differ Significantly Because of Higher Adverse Events with Triple Therapy

Daniel Erhardt1, Brian C Sauer2, Chia-Chen Teng2, Ted R. Mikuls3, Jeffrey R. Curtis4 and Grant W. Cannon2, 1Division of Rheumatology, Salt Lake City VA Medical Center and University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 2Salt Lake City VA Medical Center and University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 3Omaha VA Medical Center and University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 4Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: combination therapies, Hydroxychloroquine, methotrexate (MTX), rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2016

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy - Poster I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: We recently reported that real-world persistence in Veteran’s Affairs (VA) patients was lower in Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients receiving triple therapy [methotrexate (MTX), sulfasalazine (SUL) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ)] at 17.5% in comparison to patients receiving MTX-Tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) combination therapy at 45.2%. (p<0.001). This study reports and compares the specific reasons for discontinuation of these two combination regimens.

Methods: In this historical cohort study, US Veterans with RA enrolled in VA between January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2012 were identified using clinical and administrative data. Patients receiving MTX monotherapy to which either a TNFi (MTX-TNFi) or the simultaneous addition of HCQ/SUL (triple Rx) were followed over 12 months after initiating the combination. Discontinuation of combination therapy was defined as discontinuing any of the combination medications with a >90day gap and/or starting new drug treatments for RA. Patients discontinuing triple Rx or MTX-TNFi were matched to each other on age (±5 years), sex and site of care. The specific drugs discontinued and the reasons for discontinuing the combination therapy were determined by medical record review with the reason for cessation classified as one of the following: lack of efficacy, adverse drug event, or other (step-down therapy, preoperative discontinuation, noncompliance, lost to follow-up).

Results: There were 50 matched pairs between the two combination therapy groups evaluated. The drugs discontinued (table 1) and reasons for discontinuation (table 2) are shown below. The absolute rates for discontinuation by cause were estimated by extrapolating data over the entire cohort for the two combination treatment groups. Comparing discontinuation of triple therapy discontinuation of MTX-TNFi, the triple Rx group was associated with more discontinuations due to adverse drug events by both absolute and relative comparisons. Discontinuation due to lack of efficacy and other reasons for discontinuation were similar for the two groups. Methotrexate had the lowest discontinuation frequency in either group, with sulfasalazine being the most common drug discontinued in the triple Rx group.

Conclusion: The differences in persistence between the MTX-TNFi and Triple Rx groups in this real world observation cohort study appear to be primarily related to adverse drug events. The most common drug associated with adverse drug events was sulfasalazine, which was also the drug most frequently discontinued.

 


Disclosure: D. Erhardt, None; B. C. Sauer, Amgen, 2; C. C. Teng, Amgen, 2; T. R. Mikuls, Roche Pharmaceuticals, 2,Pfizer Inc, 5; J. R. Curtis, Roche, Genentech, UCB Pharma, Janssen, CORRONA, Amgen, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Crescendo, AbbVie, 2,Roche, Genentech, UCB Pharma, Janssen, CORRONA, Amgen, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Crescendo, AbbVie, 5; G. W. Cannon, Amgen, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Erhardt D, Sauer BC, Teng CC, Mikuls TR, Curtis JR, Cannon GW. The Reasons for Discontinuation of Combination Therapy with Methotrexate and Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors Versus Triple Therapy Differ Significantly Because of Higher Adverse Events with Triple Therapy [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-reasons-for-discontinuation-of-combination-therapy-with-methotrexate-and-tumor-necrosis-factor-inhibitors-versus-triple-therapy-differ-significantly-because-of-higher-adverse-events-with-trip/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-reasons-for-discontinuation-of-combination-therapy-with-methotrexate-and-tumor-necrosis-factor-inhibitors-versus-triple-therapy-differ-significantly-because-of-higher-adverse-events-with-trip/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology