ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 715

The REAL Life with Lupus Study: Developing a Patient Reported Outcome Measure for Use in Clinical Trials and Clinical Care

R. Paola Daly1, Sarah Gilman2, Joan T. Merrill3, Leslie M. Hanrahan4, Alisha Ladenburg2 and Anca Askanase5, 1Research & Education, Lupus Foundation of America, Washington, DC, 2Lupus Foundation of America, Washington, DC, 3Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK, 4Education & Research, Lupus Foundation of America, Washington, DC, 5Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: FDA, patient engagement, Patient participation, patient-reported outcome measures and qualitative

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus - Clinical Aspects and Treatment: Treatment and Management Studies

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: The goal of this study is to better understand how people with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in the United States experience the disease. Results will be used to develop a patient reported outcome instrument that will form half of the LFA-REAL™ system. The LFA-REAL™ will be a comprehensive system, comprised of complimentary clinician reported outcome (ClinRO) and patient reported outcome measures (PRO).  This will be the first system that will allow, from both a physician and patient perspective, both global and organ-specific disease assessment, without complex forms and scoring algorithms. The LFA-REAL™ is undergoing qualification reviews by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in order to become accepted by the FDA for use in SLE clinical trials. This abstract describes the aims, methods and preliminary findings of the qualitative research used in development of this PRO.  

Methods: This exploratory study was designed in two phases. During Phase I, a literature review was conducted, identifying common themes in the experiences of people with lupus. In-depth interviews were then completed with 11 participants, including three men and eight women from a diverse range of demographic and experiential backgrounds, including health history and lupus severity. All study participants were 18 years of age or older and confirmed formal lupus diagnosis by a rheumatologist. The interviews covered the following topics: diagnosis and current treatment, symptoms, experience receiving clinical care, and ideal tool development.  Analysis of in-depth interviews was conducted using grounded theory analysis; subsequently a conceptual framework was created to capture emerging codes and themes. This framework was iteratively refined, through a stepwise analytical review. During phase 2, the resulting conceptual framework will be used to create a draft PRO instrument. The conceptual framework and draft PRO will be evaluated through patient and physician focus group discussions, iteratively refined, and finally, tested in tandem with the LFA-REAL™ ClinRO, through a pilot study and large scale validation trial.   

Results: Our initial data confirm that, in addition to physical indicators of wellbeing, such as physical functioning, pain, fatigue, and acute and chronic symptoms, mental and emotional indicators of wellbeing are also important to people with lupus. Disease-related factors that cause anxiety or interfere with activities of daily living may be perceived as equally or more limiting than symptoms that indicate severe disease to an MD. Additionally, study subjects indicated that the ideal PRO should be able to track and rate symptoms with visual aids, assess symptoms over time and should also encourage open communication with their healthcare providers. 

Conclusion: Findings show that patients view factors that cause anxiety and interfere with daily living as equally or more limiting than symptoms of severe disease. A two part system that addresses both physicians’ and patients’ views is likely to contribute to reconciling the discordance between physician and patient assessments of disease, improving short and long term outcomes in lupus.


Disclosure:

R. P. Daly,

Lupus Foundation of America,

3;

S. Gilman,

Lupus Foundation of America,

3;

J. T. Merrill,

Medical Director for the Lupus Foundation of America. ,

5;

L. M. Hanrahan,

Lupus Foundation of America,

3;

A. Ladenburg,

Lupus Foundation of America. ,

3;

A. Askanase,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-real-life-with-lupus-study-developing-a-patient-reported-outcome-measure-for-use-in-clinical-trials-and-clinical-care/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology