ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1354

The Prevalence of Psoriatic Arthritis Based On Rheumatologists’ Clinical Assessment Before and After Laboratory and Radiographic Tests in Psoriasis Patients in European/North American Dermatology Clinics

Dafna D. Gladman1, Philip J. Mease2, Rafat Y. Faraawi3, Eustratios Bananis4, Andrew S. Koenig5, Robert Northington4, Joanne Fuiman4 and Daniel Alvarez4, 1Centre for Prognosis Studies in The Rheumatic Diseases, Toronto Western Research Institute, University of Toronto, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2Division of Rheumatology Research, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA, 3McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada, 4Specialty Care, Pfizer Inc., Collegeville, PA, 5Specialty Care Business Unit, Pfizer Inc., Collegeville, PA

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Assessment, diagnosis and psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Spondylarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis: Clinical Aspects and Treatment

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory disease with a heterogeneous presentation that is associated with impaired quality of life, joint damage, and limited ability to work.1–3 Diagnosis of PsA is often challenging and may require close collaboration between dermatologists and rheumatologists. Reliance on laboratory and/or radiographic tests to diagnose PsA varies among rheumatologists. The PREPARE trial (NCT01147874) was conducted to estimate PsA prevalence as determined by rheumatologists’ evaluation of psoriasis patients presenting to dermatologists’ offices. The objective of the secondary analysis presented here was to estimate the prevalence of PsA in psoriasis patients based on clinical assessment by rheumatologists using medical history and physical examination before and after review of supplemental laboratory and radiographic tests.

Methods: Unselected, consecutive psoriasis patients, ≥18 years of age, were initially assessed for plaque psoriasis by dermatologists at 34 dermatology centers in 7 European and North American countries. After psoriasis was confirmed, patients were evaluated for PsA by rheumatologists based on medical history and physical examination alone. Rheumatologists reassessed their diagnoses after receiving laboratory test results (eg, C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, or rheumatoid factor). In a patient subgroup undergoing radiographic evaluation of hands and feet, rheumatologists conducted a 2nd reassessment after x-rays were provided.

Results: In 949 psoriasis patients who were subsequently evaluated with the inclusion of laboratory tests, 281 (29.6%) were initially diagnosed with PsA based on medical history and physical examination alone (table). In comparison, 285 (30.0%) received clinical PsA diagnoses from rheumatologists based on medical history, physical examination, and laboratory results. In 183 psoriasis patients in the radiographic subgroup, 74 (40.4%) received a PsA diagnosis based on medical history, physical examination, and laboratory results, whereas 71 (38.8%) received this diagnosis based on medical history, physical examination, laboratory results, and radiographic findings.

Conclusion: In this large, multinational prevalence study, approximately one-third of psoriasis patients had PsA based on rheumatologists’ clinical assessment. This analysis confirms the ability of rheumatologists to diagnosis PsA based on medical history and physical examination alone. However, laboratory and radiographic results may assist in excluding and/or confirming the diagnosis in some patients.

References: 1. Husted JA, et al. Arthritis Rheum 2001; 45: 151-8. 2. Rahman P, et al. J Rheumatol 2001; 28: 1041-4. 3. Tillett W, et al. Rheumatology (Oxford, England) 2012; 51: 275-83.


Disclosure:

D. D. Gladman,

Abbott Laboratories, Amgen, BMS, Janssen, Pfizer,

2;

P. J. Mease,

Abbott, Amgen, Biogen Idec, BMS, Celgene, Crescendo, Forest, Genentech, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB,

2,

Abbott, Amgen, Biogen Idec, BMS, Celgene, Crescendo, Forest, Genentech, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB,

5,

Abbott, Amgen, Biogen Idec, BMS, Crescendo, Forest, Genentech, Janssen, Lilly, Pfizer, UCB,

8;

R. Y. Faraawi,

Pfizer, Roche, Janssen, Merck,

5,

Pfizer, Roche, Janssen, Merck,

8;

E. Bananis,

Pfizer Inc,

1,

Pfizer Inc,

3;

A. S. Koenig,

Pfizer Inc,

3;

R. Northington,

Pfizer Inc,

1,

Pfizer Inc,

5;

J. Fuiman,

Pfizer Inc,

1,

Pfizer Inc,

3;

D. Alvarez,

Pfizer Inc,

3.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-prevalence-of-psoriatic-arthritis-based-on-rheumatologists-clinical-assessment-before-and-after-laboratory-and-radiographic-tests-in-psoriasis-patients-in-europeannorth-american-dermatol/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology