ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2834

The Presence of Anti-Rituximab Antibodies Predicts Infusion-Related Reactions in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Chris Wincup1, Madhvi Menon1, Edward Smith2, David A. Isenberg1, Elizabeth Jury3 and Claudia Mauri4, 1University College London, London, United Kingdom, 2Centre for Rheumatology Research, University College London, London, United Kingdom, 3Division of Medicine, Centre for Rheumatology Research, University College London, London, United Kingdom, 4Division of Medicine, Centre for Rheumatology Research, University College London, University College London, London, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: drug safety, infusions, rituximab and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018

Title: 5T090 ACR Abstract: SLE–Clinical III: Translational Aspects (2832–2837)

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:30PM-4:00PM

Background/Purpose:

Rituximab is a genetically engineered chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody that is commonly used in the treatment of severe and refractory SLE. Although generally well tolerated, infusion-related reactions do occur and can be severe / life threatening. At present it is not possible to predict which patients are at risk of developing these reactions. A major limitation to biologic therapy is the formation of anti-drug antibodies (ADA). To date, ADA to rituximab have not previously been studied in detail.

In this study, we assessed the prevalence of ADA to rituximab in patients receiving treatment for SLE and how this related to therapeutic efficacy and prediction of infusion reactions.

Methods:

We assessed for the presence of rituximab ADA using a Meso Scale Discovery Platform in 57 patients with SLE attending University College London Hospital (UCLH), UK. A subgroup of 42 patients were followed up longitudinally for up to 8 years following the first dose of rituximab. Clinical parameters including BILAG, complement C3 levels, dsDNA titres, lymphocyte count and CD19 positive B-cells were recorded. A retrospective review of patient records was undertaken to assess for the occurrence of infusion-related reactions. Mann Witney U test was used to compare differences between ADA positive (+ve) and ADA negative (-ve) groups. Paired t-tests were used to assess for changes in variables both immediately before and six months after treatment. P-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results:

Of the 57 patients recruited, 88% were female (50/57) with a mean age of 38.9 years old. Mean disease duration was 102 months. ADA to rituximab were detected in 37% of patients (21/57). Those who developed ADA were significantly younger than ADA -ve patients (mean age 31.9; p<0.001) although no difference in disease duration between the two groups was observed (p=0.37). Males were also more likely to develop ADA than females (p=0.04). Patients receiving rituximab for the treatment of nephritis were more prone to develop ADA (p=0.03).

Following retreatment with rituximab, all ADA +ve patients developed infusion-related reactions. No reactions were seen in those who were ADA -ve. There was no difference in the efficacy of B cell-depletion between ADA +ve and ADA -ve patients (as measured by CD19 +ve B-cell count at six months; p=0.93). C3 levels showed statistically significant improvements in both groups six months post-treatment. A significant improvement in dsDNA titres was seen in those who were ADA -ve (p=0.008). However, there was no statistically significant improved in dsDNA titres in those who were ADA +ve at six months (p=0.96).

Conclusion:

We have detailed ADA to rituximab in a cohort of SLE patients who have undergone B-cell depletion therapy for the first time. Younger patients, males and those receiving treatment for nephritis were at increased risk of developing ADA. In patients who were ADA +ve there was no significant improvement in dsDNA levels at six months post-treatment. We found that the presence of these antibodies prior to retreatment predicted infusion-related reactions in all cases.

In future, routine screening for rituximab ADA will help predict those at risk of subsequent infusion-related reactions.


Disclosure: C. Wincup, None; M. Menon, None; E. Smith, None; D. A. Isenberg, None; E. Jury, None; C. Mauri, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Wincup C, Menon M, Smith E, Isenberg DA, Jury E, Mauri C. The Presence of Anti-Rituximab Antibodies Predicts Infusion-Related Reactions in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-presence-of-anti-rituximab-antibodies-predicts-infusion-related-reactions-in-patients-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-presence-of-anti-rituximab-antibodies-predicts-infusion-related-reactions-in-patients-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology