ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2452

The Performance of a Multi-marker Genetic Test to Identify Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis Among Psoriasis Patients

Lihi Eder1, Quan Li 2, Dana Jerome 3, Chandra Farrer 4, Proton Rahman 5 and Tanya N. Burry 6, 1Women’s College Hospital and the Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada, 2Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Canada, 3University of Toronto, Toronto, 4University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada, 5Memorial University, Newfoundland, NL, Canada, 6Memorial University, St. Johns, Canada

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Genetic Biomarkers and diagnosis, psoriasis, Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 12, 2019

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Clinical Poster III: Psoriatic Arthritis, Clinical Features

Session Type: Poster Session (Tuesday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Improved understanding of the complex genetic architecture of PsA along with the reduction in the cost of genetic testing provide an opportunity to assess the application of genetic testing for PsA diagnosis in clinical setting. The study aimed to assess the performance of the multi-SNP genetic test in predicting a clinical diagnosis of PsA by a rheumatologist among psoriasis patients with musculoskeletal symptoms.

Methods: 328 patients with psoriasis and musculoskeletal symptoms that were referred to a rapid access clinic for suspected PsA were enrolled. Patients with a prior diagnosis of PsA were excluded. A rheumatologist evaluated all patients and classified them as “PsA” or “not PsA”. All patients who were classified as not PsA at baseline were reassessed 1 year later to determine whether they have developed PsA. We tested 2 outcomes: 1) diagnosis of PsA at baseline; and 2) diagnosis of PsA at baseline or at 1 year. A custom multi-SNP genetic assay was genotyped on a MassARRAY system (Agena Biosciences). The custom PsA weighted genetic panel included 42 variants in or near 20 genes based on genome-wide significance in PsA studies. We tested the ability of each genetic maker individually to predict PsA using logistic regression models adjusted for age and sex. Machine-learning methods including logistic regression, naïve bayes and random forest were used to identify the optimal prediction model. Age and sex were included in the prediction models.

Results: 78 patients were classified as PsA (PsA-baseline) and the remaining 250 patients as not PsA. After 1 year, 17 additional patients developed PsA resulting in 95 patients with PsA at 1 year (PsA-1 year). The association between the tested SNPs and PsA is shown in Table 1. Five SNPs located at LCE3A (rs10888503), TNIP1 (rs146571698) and IL-23R (rs4655683, rs2201841 and rs12044149) were associated with PsA-baseline or PsA-1 year (all p< 0.05). Of the three machine-learning methods used, logistic regression was found to have the best prediction properties (highest AUC). Overall, the performance of prediction models to classify patients as PsA was modest (see Table 2). The AUC, sensitivity and specificity of the models to predict PsA at baseline were: 0.62, 0.15, 0.97, respectively and at 1 year: 0.62, 0.15, 0.94.

Conclusion: Despite the association of several genetic markers with PsA, genetic testing has only a marginal effect on predicting a diagnosis of PsA among patients with psoriasis and musculoskeletal symptoms.


Table 1

Table 1 – The association between genetic markers and psoriatic arthritis


Table 2

Table 2 – Performance of the genetic assay in predicting PsA in psoriasis


Disclosure: L. Eder, Abbvie, 2, 5, 8, Celgene, 5, Janssen, 5, Lily, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 8, UCB, 2; Q. Li, None; D. Jerome, None; C. Farrer, None; P. Rahman, AbbVie, 5, 8, AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Eli Lilly, and Novartis, 8, AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Novartis, and UCB, 5, AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis , UCB, 5, 8, Eli Lilly and Company, 5, 8, Janssen, 2, 5, 8, Janssen Inc., 2, 5, 8, Janssen, Novartis, 2, Novartis, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, 8, UCB, 5, 8; T. Burry, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Eder L, Li Q, Jerome D, Farrer C, Rahman P, Burry T. The Performance of a Multi-marker Genetic Test to Identify Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis Among Psoriasis Patients [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-performance-of-a-multi-marker-genetic-test-to-identify-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis-among-psoriasis-patients/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-performance-of-a-multi-marker-genetic-test-to-identify-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis-among-psoriasis-patients/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology