ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1762

The Muscle Biopsy Is a Useful and Noninvasive Procedure in Diagnosing Systemic Vasculitis Affecting Small-to-Medium-Sized Vessels: A Prospective Evaluation

Takahiro Nunokawa1, Takayasu Kise1, Naoto Yokogawa2, Kota Shimada1 and Shoji Sugii2, 1Department of Rheumatic diseases, Tokyo Metropolitan Tama Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan, 2Department of Rheumatic Diseases, Tokyo Metropolitan Tama Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Diagnostic Tests, muscle biopsy and vasculitis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Vasculitis

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:

Histopathological confirmation is required for the diagnosis of systemic vasculitis. However, patients suspected of vasculitis often only have lesions with a low diagnostic yield for biopsies, such as ENT and lungs. In addition, the biopsy of an involved organ, especially the nerve and kidney, is an invasive procedure carrying the risk of significant complications. In contrast, a muscle biopsy is simple and minimally invasive. However, while the muscle biopsy combined with the nerve biopsy is effective for demonstrating vasculitic neuropathy, the utility of the muscle biopsy alone is uncertain. Herein we assess the accuracy and utility of the muscle biopsy in detecting small-vessel vasculitis (SVV), or medium-vessel vasculitis (MVV) in clinical practice. 

Methods:

Consecutive patients with suspected SVV or MVV seen at our hospital between 2012 and 2014 were prospectively studied. Patients for whom a skin or renal biopsy were indicated were excluded from this study because the skin biopsy is less invasive than the muscle biopsy while the renal biopsy can provide useful information about the severity and prognosis of the disease in addition to its diagnostic value. Muscle biopsies were performed in the bilateral vastus lateralis of the quadriceps femoris because of its hypervascularity unless the patient presented myalgia in the other muscles. Imaging studies of muscles were not routinely performed. The definition of a positive muscle biopsy was the presence of inflammatory infiltrates with fibrinoid necrosis in the vessels. 

Results:

Forty-seven patients underwent muscle biopsies. Diagnosis of SVV or MVV was made in 34 patients in the follow-up period lasting more than six months. An unrelated condition was diagnosed in ten patients while nothing could be diagnosed in three patients. Of the 34 patients in whom SVV or MVV was diagnosed, a positive muscle biopsy was obtained in 20 patients (15 with MPA, 3 with PN, and 2 with EGPA) while other findings led to the same diagnosis in 14 (7 with MPA, 3 with GPA, 3 with PN, 1 with rheumatoid vasculitis). The sensitivity of the muscle biopsy was 59%.  Of the 12 patients presenting vasculitic neuropathy, muscle biopsies demonstrated vasculitis in nine patients, with 75% sensitivity. Myalgia was seen in ten (50%) vasculitis patients with positive biopsies and in two (14.3%) patients with negative biopsies (p = 0.031). There were no complications in the procedure except for delayed wound healing in one patient.

Conclusion:

The muscle biopsy is a safe method which offers a high diagnostic yield in diagnosing SVV or MVV in the absence of indications for a skin or renal biopsy. Further, the muscle biopsy can be used in place of the nerve biopsy for diagnosing vasculitis in patients with vasculitic neuropathy.


Disclosure:

T. Nunokawa,
None;

T. Kise,
None;

N. Yokogawa,
None;

K. Shimada,
None;

S. Sugii,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-muscle-biopsy-is-a-useful-and-noninvasive-procedure-in-diagnosing-systemic-vasculitis-affecting-small-to-medium-sized-vessels-a-prospective-evaluation/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology