ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2269

The Meaningful Patient Engagement in Research Framework – an Empirically Based Conceptual Framework

Clayon Hamilton1,2, Alison Hoens1,2,3, Catherine L. Backman4,5, Annette McKinnon6, Shanon McQuitty6, Kelly English6 and Linda Li4, 1Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2Arthritis Research Canada, Richmond, BC, Canada, 3BC SUPPORT Unit, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 4Rheumatology, Arthritis Research Canada, Richmond, BC, Canada, 5Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 6Arthritis Patient Advisory Board, Arthritis Research Canada, Richmond, BC, Canada

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: patient engagement, patient preferences and qualitative

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 7, 2017

Title: ARHP Patient Outcomes, Attitudes, and Preferences Poster

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Patient engagement in research is promoted to improve the relevance and quality of health research, but has little conceptualization derived from empirical data. To address this issue, we sought to develop an empirically based conceptual framework for meaningful patient engagement in research founded on a patient perspective.

Methods:

We conducted a qualitative analysis of transcripts from one-on-one in-depth interviews with 18 patient research partners who are living with arthritis. The data analysis involved three phases: identifying the themes, developing a framework, and confirming the framework. Specifically, we coded and organized the data, and abstracted, illustrated, described, and explored the emergent themes using thematic analysis. Directed content analysis was conducted to derive concepts from 18 publications related to patient engagement in research to supplement, confirm or refute, and extend the emergent conceptual framework. The framework was critically reviewed by our entire research team, including four patient research partners with arthritis.

Results: The experiences the participants had when they worked with researchers were generally positive. Eight themes emerged: Procedural Requirements, Convenience, Contributions, Support, Team Interactions, Research Environment, Feel Valued, and Benefits. These themes were interconnected and formed a conceptual framework to explain the phenomenon of meaningful patient engagement in research from a patient perspective. For example, the contributions of patient research partners could be facilitated when researchers maintain certain procedural requirements, offer opportunities to engage in ways that patient research partners find convenient, and provide appropriate support, such that patient research partners feel valued and identify benefits from engaging with a research team.

Conclusion: The Meaningful Patient Engagement in Research (PEIR) Framework provides guidance regarding key aspects of meaningful patient engagement in research that could be operationalized by research teams. It could be particularly useful when patient-researcher partnerships are led by researchers with little experience of engaging patients in research.


Disclosure: C. Hamilton, None; A. Hoens, None; C. L. Backman, None; A. McKinnon, None; S. McQuitty, None; K. English, None; L. Li, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Hamilton C, Hoens A, Backman CL, McKinnon A, McQuitty S, English K, Li L. The Meaningful Patient Engagement in Research Framework – an Empirically Based Conceptual Framework [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-meaningful-patient-engagement-in-research-framework-an-empirically-based-conceptual-framework/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-meaningful-patient-engagement-in-research-framework-an-empirically-based-conceptual-framework/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology