ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2894

The Majority of Patients with Moderate to Severe Psoriatic Arthritis Had Existing Structural Damage, Predisposing Them to Further Progression, Which Was Markedly Inhibited By Adalimumab

Pranav Sheth1, Philip J. Mease2, Yihan Li3, Fabiana Ganz4 and Maja Hojnik5, 1Group Health Associates, Trihealth, Cincinnati, OH, 2Seattle Rheumatology Associates, Seattle, WA, 3AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, 4Neuhofstrasse 23, AbbVie AG, Baar, Switzerland, 5AbbVie, Ljubljana, Slovenia

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Adalimumab and psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Title: Spondylarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis - Clinical Aspects and Treatment Poster III: Therapy

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Patients (pts) with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) may experience structural damage if not appropriately treated. The purpose was to determine 1) the frequency of radiographic structural damage in PsA pts at baseline (BL), and BL patient and disease characteristics associated with having BL structural damage 2) the risk of further radiographic progression in PsA pts with/without BL structural damage 3) the inhibition of radiographic progression by adalimumab (ADA) in PsA pts with/without BL structural damage.

Methods:

The analysis used data from the ADEPT trial1, which was a 24-week (wk) randomized placebo (PBO)- controlled trial that evaluated efficacy and safety of ADA in pts with moderate to severe PsA (mean duration of approx. 9.5 years). Pts with available radiographs of hands and feet at BL and wk 24 were included in the present analyses. Radiographic damage at BL was defined as modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) >0.5; radiographic progression was defined as a change in mTSS by >0.5 over 24 wks. In each treatment group (ADA or PBO), the proportion of pts with radiographic progression (progressors) from BL to wk 24 was determined among pts with/without BL structural damage. The association of the following BL characteristics with radiographic damage at BL was determined by univariate and multivariate logistic regression: age, weight, swollen joint count at 28 joints (SJC28), tender joint count at 28 joints (TJC28), duration of psoriasis or PsA, C-reactive protein (CRP), and Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI).

Results:

Out of 313 pts randomized in the ADEPT trial (151 to ADA, 162 to PBO), 296 pts (95%) had radiographic data available at BL and wk 24. Eighty-one percent (81%; 239/296 pts) had radiographic damage at BL; 83% of pts with PsA duration ≥2 years and 72% of pts with PsA duration <2 years. Among 239 pts with BL damage, significantly fewer pts in the ADA-treated group (13/118, 11.0%) vs the PBO-treated group (43/121, 35.5%) experienced radiographic progression by wk 24 (p<.001). The treatment effect of ADA in pts with BL damage was larger than the treatment effect of ADA in the overall population (24.5% vs 19.2% of non-progressors). Among pts without BL damage, 1/26 (3.8%) and 1/31 (3.2%) pts in the ADA and PBO group, respectively, had further damage by wk 24. Multivariate analysis indicated that higher CRP and age at BL were associated with an increased risk of having existing BL structural damage (p<.01).

Conclusion:

The majority of PsA pts had radiographic damage at BL, even with < 2 years of disease duration. Pts with BL structural damage had a greater risk for further progression overall, while the inhibitory effect of ADA on radiographic progression was more pronounced in pts with BL damage. Higher CRP and age at BL were associated with BL damage. The data suggests that effective treatment to prevent further radiographic damage would be particularly beneficial in pts with existing damage, who in the ADEPT trial constituted the majority.

 Reference: 1) Mease P et al, Arthritis Rheum 2005;52:3279-89


Disclosure: P. Sheth, None; P. J. Mease, AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen Idec, Bristol Myers, Celgene, Genentech, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB., 9; Y. Li, AbbVie, 1,AbbVie, 3; F. Ganz, AbbVie, 1,AbbVie, 3; M. Hojnik, AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB., 9.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Sheth P, Mease PJ, Li Y, Ganz F, Hojnik M. The Majority of Patients with Moderate to Severe Psoriatic Arthritis Had Existing Structural Damage, Predisposing Them to Further Progression, Which Was Markedly Inhibited By Adalimumab [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-majority-of-patients-with-moderate-to-severe-psoriatic-arthritis-had-existing-structural-damage-predisposing-them-to-further-progression-which-was-markedly-inhibited-by-adalimumab/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-majority-of-patients-with-moderate-to-severe-psoriatic-arthritis-had-existing-structural-damage-predisposing-them-to-further-progression-which-was-markedly-inhibited-by-adalimumab/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology