ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 440

the Majority of Biologic Injectors Are Stored Under Suboptimal Conditions at Home

Marin de Jong1, Marieke Pierik1, Andy Peters1, Mark Roemers2, Veronique Hilhorst3 and A. van Tubergen4, 1Department of Internal Medicine, division of Gastroenterology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands, 2AntTail, Utrecht, Netherlands, 3Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Toxicology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, m, Netherlands, 4Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Biologics and anti-TNF therapy

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2016

Title: Quality Measures and Quality of Care - Poster I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

The introduction of biologics has significantly improved long-term outcome of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. However, after discontinuation or switch of therapy, 26-49% of patients on subcutaneous biologics have unused injectors at home, leading to spillage of these costly drugs. When drug quality is ensured by proper storage within recommended temperature ranges (2˚C-8˚C), unused injectors could potentially be redistributed reducing spillage. The aim of this study was to assess the quality of home storage by evaluating the proportion of injectors stored within the recommended temperature range.

Methods:

All subcutaneous golimumab users at the Maastricht University Medical Centre+, irrespective of the indication, were asked to participate in this prospective study between April and October 2015. During 3 months, patients received golimumab in the original package provided in a sealed bag containing a validated temperature sensor connected to the internet. Patients were asked to store their medication as usual. Temperature was measured every 5 minutes. Deviations from the recommended range were defined as 1). > 30 minutes below 2˚C or above 8˚C and 2). any duration below 0˚C. After 3 months, patients filled out a questionnaire on their opinion about monitoring medication storage conditions at home and potential redistribution of unused injectors.

Results:

In total, 50 patients (46.3% male, mean age 52.3 ± 13.8 years) received 276 injectors with temperature sensors that generated 2,466,576 measurements. Figure 1 shows that 11.6% of the injectors were stored within the recommended temperature range. Of the remainder, 11.2% were stored more than 30 minutes below 0˚C and 19.6% were stored above 8°C for more than 48 hours. Of all patients, 95% would appreciate an alarm when the injector is not stored under the right conditions, and also 95% is willing to accept unused medication when product quality is ensured.  

Conclusion:

Only a minority of injectors was stored within the recommended temperature range. This hinders not only redistribution of unused biologics, but is also alarming regarding the effectiveness of the drug in these patients. We are currently investigating how to improve biologics’ home- and transport storage conditions and the criteria to be met for redistribution.


Disclosure: M. de Jong, None; M. Pierik, None; A. Peters, None; M. Roemers, None; V. Hilhorst, None; A. van Tubergen, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

de Jong M, Pierik M, Peters A, Roemers M, Hilhorst V, van Tubergen A. the Majority of Biologic Injectors Are Stored Under Suboptimal Conditions at Home [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-majority-of-biologic-injectors-are-stored-under-suboptimal-conditions-at-home/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-majority-of-biologic-injectors-are-stored-under-suboptimal-conditions-at-home/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology