ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1236

The Influence of Testimonials on Patient Decision-Making

Changchuan Jiang1, Ellen Peters2 and Liana Fraenkel3, 1Yale University, New Haven, CT, 2Decision Research, Eugene, OR, 3Rheumatology, Rheumatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, New Haven, CT

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Osteoporosis and patient preferences

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 6, 2017

Title: Patient Outcomes, Preferences, and Attitudes Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Testimonials have been shown to have a strong influence on patient decision-making. Patients are increasingly accessing the Internet as a source of medical information. In this study, we sought to examine whether the presence and order of patients’ testimonials influenced participant’ willingness to take a medication, subjective knowledge, and risk perceptions.

Methods: We administered a survey to senior Mechanical workers (≥ 50 years old; not on medication for osteoporosis or osteopenia) to examine the influence of online medication reviews on participants’ stated willingness to take an osteoporosis medication. We first described osteoporosis and its complications and subsequently asked participants to imagine themselves as a patient with this disease in a clinical encounter during which a physician recommended treatment. Participants’ received information describing outcomes using one of three randomly distributed versions: Icon arrays, icon arrays followed by narrative reviews, or narrative reviews followed by icon arrays. Numeracy was measured using the Rasch-based Numeracy Scale. Participant’ willingness to take a medication, subjective knowledge, perceived benefit, riskiness, and worry related to the medication were measured on 10-point scales before and after reading the description of the medication presented in one of the three versions. We examined whether the presence and order of online testimonials influenced participant’ willingness to take the described medication using a liner regression including age, sex, race, education, previous history of osteoporosis/fracture. Numeracy as a main effect and effect modifier were also included in the model. Similar models were used to examine the influence of online testimonials on participant’ subjective knowledge, perceived benefit, riskiness, and worry.

Results: 499 valid responses were included in the analyses. The mean (SD) age was 59 (7), and the majority were female (61%), white (74%) and college graduate (56%). We found no significant differences in participant’ willingness (p=0.21), subjective knowledge (p=0.43), perceived benefit (p=0.12), riskiness (p=0.51), and worry (p=0.06) across the three groups. Participants with higher numeracy were significantly more willing take the medication (p=0.04). Race was associated with riskiness and worry, with minority subjects having significantly higher scores on both scales. In contrast, participants with personal history of osteoporosis/low bone density were more likely to perceive greater benefit of the medication (p=0.04).

Conclusion: In this study, we found no main effect of the presence or order of online testimonials on participants’ decision-making. Interestingly, willingness and perceptions related to risks and benefits were each associated with different personal characteristics.


Disclosure: C. Jiang, None; E. Peters, None; L. Fraenkel, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Jiang C, Peters E, Fraenkel L. The Influence of Testimonials on Patient Decision-Making [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-influence-of-testimonials-on-patient-decision-making/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-influence-of-testimonials-on-patient-decision-making/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology