ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1332

The Incidence of Exacerbation of Pre-Existing Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) Is Higher in TNF Blockers Than in Non-TNF Blockers in RA

Tamao Nakashita1, Shinji Motojima2, Natsuki Fujio2 and Akira Jibatake3, 1Department of Rheumatology and Allergy, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa City, Japan, 2Department of Rheumatology and Allergy, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa city, Japan, 3Depertment of Rheumatology and Allergy, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa city, Japan

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: biologic response modifiers and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:

Exacerbation of interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a problem when biologics are administrated in patients with RA, and not a few fatal cases have been reported in Japan.  According to the post-marketing surveillance report of TNF blockers, the development/exacerbation rate of ILD was 0.5 %.  In our department, however, the rate was 5 % probably because we have many RA cases with ILD.  We have shown that in patients with pre-existing ILD, the rate is nearly 30%.  In japan there are 6 biologics available for the treatment of RA, 4 of which are TNF blockers and 2 are non-TNF blockers.  Here we compared the incidence of exacerbation of pre-existing ILD in patients administrated with TNF blockers and non-TNF blockers.

Methods:

Subjects were 58 patients with RA, with the mean age of 66.  As a part of workup before administration of biologics, chest CT scan was done.  After administration of biologics, chest X-ray film (CXR) was taken at least every 3 months.  When newly developed shadows were found on CXR or when patients complained of respiratory symptoms for more than 2 weeks, chest CT scan was done again.  The severity of ILD was graded into 3, grades 1 to grade 3, according to the extent of ILD on chest CT.  The biologics administrated were infliximab (IFX) for 8, etanercept (ETN) for 36, adalimumab (ADA) for 2, tocilizumab (TCZ) for 9 and abatacept (ABT), respectively.  The duration of observation was 12 months, except when the biologics were withdrawn because of exacerbation of ILD. 

Results:

The ILD of 30, 22 and 6 patients were graded into grade 1, 2 and 3, respectively.  The ILD exacerbated in 14 subjects (24.1 %); the duration from the introduction of biologics to the exacerbation was from 1 to 12 months with the median of 7 months.  The biologics used at the exacerbation of ILD were IFX in 5, ETN in 8, ADA in 1, TCZ in 0 and ABT in 0, respectively.  The incidence of ILD exacerbation with TNF blockers and non-TNF blockers were 30.4 % (14/46) and 0 % (0/12), respectively, and there was a significant difference between them (p = 0.024).There were no differences between the subjects with ILD exacerbation and those without it in age, gender, RF titer, the ILD grade, KL-6 concentration, and the dose of prednisolone and MTX.  The KL-6 concentration increased significantly when ILD exacerbated (p < 0.05).  The biologics were withdrawn in 11 of 14 subjects with ILD exacerbation, and 2 subjects with ILD grade 2 and 3 died due to respiratory failure.

Conclusion: The exacerbation rate was high in patients with pre-existing ILD when TNF blockers were administrated.


Disclosure:

T. Nakashita,
None;

S. Motojima,
None;

N. Fujio,
None;

A. Jibatake,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-incidence-of-exacerbation-of-pre-existing-interstitial-lung-disease-ild-is-higher-in-tnf-blockers-than-in-non-tnf-blockers-in-ra/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology