ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2302

The Impact of Prior Fibromyalgia Treatment on the Response to Pregabalin in Fibromyalgia Clinical Trials

Lynne Pauer1, Andrew Clair2, Pritha Bhadra Brown2, Marie Ortiz2 and Joseph Scavone1, 1Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT, 2Pfizer Inc., New York, NY

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Clinical research, fibromyalgia, pain and treatment

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Title: Fibromyalgia, Soft Tissue Disorders, Regional and Specific Clinical Pain Syndromes Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Fibromyalgia (FM) is a chronic, widespread pain disorder for which Lyrica is an approved treatment. Antidepressants, gabapentin, muscle relaxants, and opioids are frequently used to treat FM. The impact of prior use of these treatments on the response to pregabalin treatment in FM has not been assessed. Previous work showed that FM patients respond to treatment with pregabalin with significant improvements in pain scores irrespective of prior opioid use (Argoff et al. Clin J Pain. 2015).

Methods:

A pooled analysis of 4 Phase 3 placebo-controlled clinical trials of pregabalin (300-600 mg/day) of 13-15 week duration in FM patients was conducted to assess the effect of prior treatment with antidepressants (including SSRIs, SNRIs, and TCAs), gabapentin, or muscle relaxants on the response to treatment with pregabalin. Patients were divided into those who had used one of these treatments prior to the trial and those who had not. Patients could have taken prior FM treatments in more than 1 category. Changes in least squares (LS) mean pain scores (assessed by NRS-Pain, a 0-10 numeric rating scale administered daily, controlled for baseline pain score) in the pregabalin and placebo groups were assessed. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) methodology was used to impute missing data.

Results:

There were 2668 patients in the analysis set, including 717 patients with prior antidepressant use, 380 with prior muscle relaxant use, and 113 with prior gabapentin use. Pregabalin improved the LS mean difference in pain score compared with placebo in patients both with and without prior use of these medications. Treatment differences (placebo adjusted) for subjects with prior use of these medications were as follows: gabapentin:  -0.78 (95% confidence interval -1.56, 0.01), p=0.0522; antidepressants: -1.00 (CI -1.33, -0.67), p<.0001; and muscle relaxants: -0.96 (CI -1.46, -0.46), p=0.0002. Treatment differences (placebo adjusted) for subjects who did not previously use these medications were as follows: no prior gabapentin:  -0.54 (CI -0.71, -0.37), p<.0001; no prior antidepressant: -0.40 (CI -0.59, -0.21), p<.0001; and no prior muscle relaxant: -0.49 (CI -0.67, -0.31), p<.0001. These results were statistically significant in each case apart from prior gabapentin (treatment difference -0.78, p=0.0522), likely due to the smaller size (N=113; pregabalin N=74, placebo N=39) of this cohort. Similar results compared with the overall antidepressant result were observed for SSRIs, SNRIs, and TCAs separately, based on summary statistics. In general, patients with prior FM treatment had slightly higher baseline pain scores.

Conclusion:

FM patients responded to treatment with pregabalin with improvements in pain scores relative to placebo, irrespective of prior treatment with gabapentin, muscle relaxants, or antidepressants. These results were statistically significant apart from the smallest population studied (gabapentin, N=113), which had a similar magnitude of effect. Similar conclusions were reached in previous work regarding opioids (Argoff et al). These data could inform treatment decisions for FM patients currently taking these medications.


Disclosure: L. Pauer, Pfizer Inc., 3,Pfizer Inc., 1; A. Clair, Pfizer Inc, 1,Pfizer Inc, 3; P. Bhadra Brown, Pfizer Inc., 3,Pfizer Inc., 1; M. Ortiz, Pfizer Inc., 1,Pfizer Inc., 3; J. Scavone, Pfizer Inc., 1,Pfizer Inc., 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Pauer L, Clair A, Bhadra Brown P, Ortiz M, Scavone J. The Impact of Prior Fibromyalgia Treatment on the Response to Pregabalin in Fibromyalgia Clinical Trials [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-impact-of-prior-fibromyalgia-treatment-on-the-response-to-pregabalin-in-fibromyalgia-clinical-trials/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-impact-of-prior-fibromyalgia-treatment-on-the-response-to-pregabalin-in-fibromyalgia-clinical-trials/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology