ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1684

The Impact of Pregnancy Timing on Outcomes in SLE

Catherine Sims1, Amanda Eudy2, Ceshae Harding1, Cuoghi Edens3, Mehret Birru Talabi4, Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman5, Laura Neil1 and Megan Clowse6, 1Duke University, Durham, NC, 2Duke University, Raleigh, NC, 3University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 4University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 5Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, 6Duke University, Chapel Hill, NC

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: Disparities, pregnancy, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), Women's health

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 13, 2023

Title: Abstracts: Reproductive Issues in Rheumatic Disorders

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:00PM-5:30PM

Background/Purpose: To minimize risk of poor pregnancy outcomes, the ACR Reproductive Health Guideline recommends women conceive when SLE is well controlled and treated with pregnancy-compatible medications. In addition to SLE disease activity and medications, social determinants of health can impact pregnancy outcomes. We studied the association between pregnancy timing, social determinants of health, and pregnancy outcomes.

Methods: All study participants met SLICC criteria for SLE, were pregnant, and enrolled in a prospective registry. At baseline, patients reported social determinants of health and SLE activity; medications, laboratory results, and physician-assessments of SLE activity were also recorded. Pregnancy timing was defined in 3 ways based on whether the woman was medically optimized, the woman intended to become pregnant, or both. “Medically optimized” pregnancies met the following criteria: no teratogen use, continued pregnancy-compatible SLE medications, and urine protein:creatinine ratio (UPC) < 1g in the 6 months prior to or during the first trimester. “Intended” pregnancies were defined using the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy (LMUP), a validated, 6-question self-reported survey assessing the extent that the woman intended to become pregnant. Well-timed pregnancies were both medically optimized and intended; ill-timed were either not medically optimized and/or intended. Statistical analyses compared differences in outcomes by our three definitions of pregnancy timing.

Results: A total of 115 women were enrolled, with half of pregnancies both intended and medically optimized, 20% neither intended nor medically optimized, 17% not intended but medically optimized, and 13% intended but not medically optimized. Ill-timed pregnancies were more likely to be conceived by women who were single, identify as Black or Hispanic, receive Medicaid or Medicare, have a lower income and level of education (Table 1). Additionally, women with ill-timed pregnancy had higher physician-reported SLE disease activity, were less likely to be taking pregnancy-compatible medications at their initial pregnancy visit and more likely to be taking mycophenolate at conception (Table 2). Ill-timed pregnancies were more likely to end with preeclampsia and early delivery (Table 3). In pregnancies that were not medically optimized, when adjusted for marital status, low income, Medicaid or Medicare, the risk of preterm birth and preeclampsia was three times higher than in medially optimized pregnancies (AOR: 3.33; 95% CI: 1.06, 10 for preterm birth and AOR: 3.0; 95% CI: 0.95, 10 for preeclampsia). These pregnancies were, on average, more than two weeks shorter (adjusted β: -2.38; 95% CI: -4.42, -0.34).

Conclusion: In this cohort of pregnant patients with SLE, women with ill-timed pregnancies, whether because she didn’t intend to be pregnant or was not medically optimized for pregnancy, had multiple factors contributing to their higher risk for poor pregnancy outcomes, including social disadvantage, increased lupus activity, and inappropriate medication use. In order to improve outcomes in SLE, we need to target specific interventions to this particularly vulnerable population.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2

Supporting image 3


Disclosures: C. Sims: None; A. Eudy: Amgen, 2, Exagen, 5, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 5, Immunovant, 5, Pfizer, 5; C. Harding: None; C. Edens: None; M. Birru Talabi: None; R. Ramsey-Goldman: Ampel Solutions, 2, Calabetta, 2, Exagen, 2, Immunocor, 6; L. Neil: None; M. Clowse: Exagen, 5, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, 5, Immunovant, 5, UCB, 2, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Sims C, Eudy A, Harding C, Edens C, Birru Talabi M, Ramsey-Goldman R, Neil L, Clowse M. The Impact of Pregnancy Timing on Outcomes in SLE [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-impact-of-pregnancy-timing-on-outcomes-in-sle/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-impact-of-pregnancy-timing-on-outcomes-in-sle/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology