ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2302

The Impact of JIA on Physician and Patient-Reported Outcomes over the First Five Years Following Diagnosis

Stephanie Shoop-Worrall1, Suzanne M Verstappen2, Janet E. McDonagh3, Wendy Thomson4 and Kimme L. Hyrich4, 1The University of Manchester, Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Manchester, United Kingdom, 2Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Centre for Musculoskeletal and Dermatology Research, Faculty of Medicine, Biology and Health, United Kingdom, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom, 3Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, Centre for MSK Research, Manchester, United Kingdom, 4National Institute of Health Research Manchester Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Centre, Central Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Disability, Disease Activity, juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), outcomes and quality of life

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 7, 2017

Title: Pediatric Rheumatology – Clinical and Therapeutic Aspects Poster III: Juvenile Arthritis

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Information regarding longer-term outcomes in JIA largely pre-date the introduction of biologic therapies and have been cross-sectional. The aim of this analysis was to assess physician and parent-reported outcomes over the first 5 years following initial presentation to paediatric rheumatology in young people diagnosed with JIA since 2001.

Methods: Young people with JIA of any disease subtype were selected if enrolled in the Childhood Arthritis Prospective Study (CAPS), a UK multicentre inception cohort, between October 2001 and January 2011. The following outcomes were assessed annually to five years and included in this analysis: Active joint count, limited joint count, physician’s global assessment (10cm visual analogue score (VAS)), parental global evaluation (10cm VAS), pain (10cm VAS), functional ability (Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) and psychosocial health (psychosocial scale on the Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)).

Outcomes were assessed descriptively over time and differences between subtypes were assessed by applying multilevel (patient-level) zero-inflated negative binomial (CHAQ) and linear (all other outcomes) regression analyses, adjusting for age and disease duration at presentation, gender and hospital.

Results: Of 1087 young people, 67% were female and median age at initial presentation to paediatric rheumatology was 8 years (IQR 3, 12). The most common disease subtype was oligoarthritis (52%) and least common RF-positive polyarticular JIA (4%). Eighty four percent had ever been treated with NSAIDs, 74% corticosteroids, 55% with DMARDs and 21% with biologics within follow-up.

In the entire cohort, all outcomes were mild to moderate at baseline (median 2 active joints, 1 limited joint, physician’s global 2.9cm, patient global 2.2cm, pain 3.1cm, CHAQ 0.8 and CHQ psychosocial 50). Overall improvements were evident in all outcomes over the first year then remained stable with no further improvements at the cohort level to five years.

Compared with those with oligoarticular JIA, patients with both polyarthritis and systemic subtypes experienced significantly poorer outcomes across all variables. The most extreme point estimates were experienced in RF-positive polyarticular JIA, having 3 more active and limited joints (both 95% CI 2, 4), 1cm higher physician’s (95% CI 0.4, 1.2) , parental (95% CI 0.5, 1.9) and pain (95% CI 0.3, 1.8) scores and 50% higher CHAQ scores (95% CI 1.2, 1.7). Young people with enthesitis-related, psoriatic and undifferentiated JIA experienced largely similar outcomes to those with oligoarthritis over follow-up.

Conclusion: On average, the largest improvement in physician and patient-reported outcomes occur in the first year following diagnosis, perhaps confirming the importance of early treat-to-target strategies. Patients with systemic and both polyarticular JIA subtypes have poorer parent and physician-reported outcomes than those with enthesitis-related, psoriatic, undifferentiated or oligoarthritis.


Disclosure: S. Shoop-Worrall, None; S. M. Verstappen, None; J. E. McDonagh, None; W. Thomson, None; K. L. Hyrich, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Shoop-Worrall S, Verstappen SM, E. McDonagh J, Thomson W, Hyrich KL. The Impact of JIA on Physician and Patient-Reported Outcomes over the First Five Years Following Diagnosis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-impact-of-jia-on-physician-and-patient-reported-outcomes-over-the-first-five-years-following-diagnosis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-impact-of-jia-on-physician-and-patient-reported-outcomes-over-the-first-five-years-following-diagnosis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology