ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 495

The Impact Of Inadequate Response To Prior Biologic Agents On Abatacept Drug Retention In Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients. A Pan-European Analysis Of RA Registries

Axel Finckh1, Florenzo Iannone2, Juan Gomez Reino3, David Neto4, Elisabeth Lie5, Piet van Riel6, Merete Lund Hetland7, Karel Pavelka8, Carl Turesson9, Xavier Mariette10 and Jacques-Eric Gottenberg11, 1Department of Medical Specialities, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland, 2D.I.M.I.M.P, Rheumatology Unit - University of Bari, Bari, Italy, 3Rheumatology Department, Hospital Clínico de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain, 4Rheumatology, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland, 5Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway, 6Rheumatology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands, 7Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, The Danish Rheumatologic Database (DANBIO), Glostrup Hospital., Copenhagen, Denmark, 8Department of Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic, 9Lund University, Malmö, Sweden, 10Paris-Sud University, Paris, France, 11Division of Rheumatology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Abatacept, Biologic drugs, drug therapy, registries and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy I

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:

In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), abatacept (ABA) may be used in biologic naïve patients (pts) or after failure to an anti-TNF or other biologic agents (BIO-IR). Drug retention is a useful overall measure of effectiveness, integrating both clinical response and tolerance. For several biologic antirheumatic agents (BIO), it has been demonstrated that a history of BIO-IR strongly decreases subsequent drug retention. The impact of BIO-IR has been less studied with ABA.

The objective of this study was to compare drug retention of ABA in BIO-IR pts.

Methods:

This is an observational cohort analysis of 8 prospective, longitudinal, European cohorts of RA pts (ARTIS (Sweden), ATTRA (Czech Republic), BIOBADASER (Spain), DANBIO (Denmark), GISEA (Italy), NORDMARDS (Norway), ORA (France), SCQM (Switzerland)). We included all RA pts treated with ABA in real life settings. The primary end point was drug retention of ABA. Secondary endpoint was ABA discontinuation for ineffectiveness. Time to discontinuation was defined as the time between drug initiation and last administration plus one dispensation interval. Drug discontinuation was analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model, adjusting for potential confounders, such as calendar year of treatment initiation, patient demographics and disease characteristics. 

Results:

We identified 3783 pts initiating ABA contributing 5980 patient-years of follow-up. Of these, 1159 pts were BIO-naïve, 883 pts had 1 prior BIO-IR, 861 pts had 2, 555 pts had 3 and 325 pts had 4 or more prior BIO-IRs. 85% of pts in the BIO-IR group had failed an anti-TNF agent as last biotherapy. Pts were mostly female (81%), with a mean age of 57 yrs, long disease durations (mean 12.1 yrs), and active, severe disease at baseline (mean values for DAS28: 5.1, ESR: 33 mm/hr, HAQ: 1.3).

In the 1977 ABA discontinuations, 72% were motivated by ineffectiveness, 24% by adverse events, 2% by remission and 2% by other reasons, when the reason for discontinuation was indicated. Drug retention differed significantly by prior BIO-IRs (p<0.001, logrank test). BIO-naïve pts had the highest drug retention (reference Hazard Ratio (HR): 1), pts with 1-3 prior BIO-IRs had lower retention (HR: 1.2-1.3, p<0.01),  and pts with 4 or more BIO-IRs had the lowest retention (HR: 1.4, p < 0.001). A similar trend was observed when examining treatment discontinuation for ABA ineffectiveness (p< 0.001, logrank test). Drug discontinuation for ineffectiveness was uncommon in BIO-naïve pts (reference HR: 1), higher in pts with 1-2 prior BIO-IRs (HR: 1.2, p<0.05) and highest in pts with 3 or more BIO-IRs (HR: 1.5-1.6, p<0.01). Other strong predictors of drug retention were calendar year of ABA initiation, with significantly shorter drug retention in recent years (≤2007: HR=1; 2008-9: HR=1.2; ≥2010: HR: 2.2) and country of origin. 

Conclusion:

Drug retention of ABA is strongly influenced by a history of prior BIO-IR, with higher discontinuation rates in pts having experienced more BIO-IRs, which suggests a progressive selection of pts with more resistant disease. However, some pts with a history of several BIO-IRs remained on ABA for an extensive time, suggesting some benefit of switching modes of action after anti-TNF-IR.


Disclosure:

A. Finckh,

BMS, Pfizer,

2,

BMS, Abbvie, Roche, Pfizer,

5,

Roche,,

8;

F. Iannone,

BMS, Pfizer, Abbvie, UCB, Merck,

5,

Roche, Actelion, Merck,

2;

J. Gomez Reino,
None;

D. Neto,
None;

E. Lie,

Pfizer, Abbvie, Roche,

5,

BMS, Pfizer, Abbvie, Roche,

8;

P. van Riel,
None;

M. L. Hetland,

Roche Pharmaceuticals,

5,

MSD, Pfizer,

8;

K. Pavelka,

Roche, BMS, Pfizer, MSD, AbbVie,

8;

C. Turesson,

Abbvie, Pfizer, Roche,

2,

Abbvie, BMS, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, UCB,

5;

X. Mariette,

Pfizer, Roche,

2,

BMD, GSK, LFB, Pfizer, Roche,

5;

J. E. Gottenberg,

Pfizer, Roche,

2,

Abbvie, BMS,MSD, Pfizer, Roche,

5.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-impact-of-inadequate-response-to-prior-biologic-agents-on-abatacept-drug-retention-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-a-pan-european-analysis-of-ra-registries/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology