ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0809

The Impact of Flares on Clinical and Patient Reported Outcomes in Rheumatoid and Undifferentiated Arthritis Patients

Johanna Maria Maassen1, Sytske Anne Bergstra1, PDM de Buck2, Maikel van Oosterhout3, Cornelia F. Allaart1 and Tom WJ Huizinga1, 1Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands, 2Haaglanden medical center, The Hague, Netherlands, 3Groene Hart Hospital, Gouda, Netherlands

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (Dmards), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), risk factors

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 7, 2021

Title: RA – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster II: Miscellaneous Aspects of RA (0786–0812)

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: There are many definitions of flare in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Loss of low disease activity is associated with clinically relevant deterioration. Patients in DAS remission may flare to DAS≥1.6 but still have low disease activity. How does this affect outcomes? Therefore the objective of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of disease flares in patients treated to target DAS < 1.6, and to study the impact on clinical and patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

Methods: In the IMPROVED study 610 patients with early RA or UA were treated to target DAS< 1.6 for 5 years. Flares were defined as; A) DAS≥1.6 regardless of the previous DAS and ≥0.6 increase; B) DAS≥1.6 and previous DAS< 1.6 with ≥0.6increase. Kruskal Wallis tests were used to compare mean HAQ over time, HAQ at 5y, and median SHS progression at 5y between patients with different no. of flares. The OR for a significant deterioration of ≥20mm (from the preceding visit) on a visual analogue score (VAS) for disease activity, pain and morning stiffness during flares were calculated using a generalized linear mixed model.

Results: Over time 75% of patients had ≥1 flare A, and 68% ≥1 flare B. In 55% and 69% of cases, respectively, DAS remained ≤2.4. In 55% of flares A and B, a clinically relevant increase in HAQ of ≥0.22 occurred. This significantly (p< 0.01) increased to 68% in flares A and 76% in flares B if the DAS had increased to ≥2.4. More flares A per person were associated with a higher mean HAQ over-time and at 60 months and SHS progression at 5y (table 1). Also for the patient reported outcomes, there was a significant risk for a >20 mm deterioration (ORs ≥1 with 90% confidence intervals exceeding 1) for flares A and B (table 2).

Conclusion: In most patients, significant deterioration in PROs occurred when DAS increased to >1.6, even if DAS remained ≤2.4. Regardless of previous DAS, an increase in ≥0.6 DAS points was clinically relevant. Cumulative flares were associated with loss of and radiological progression at 5 years.


Disclosures: J. Maassen, None; S. Bergstra, Pfizer, 5; P. de Buck, None; M. van Oosterhout, None; C. Allaart, Dutch College of Health Insurances, 5, Schering-Plough BV, 5, Centocor Inc., 5, Eli Lilly, 5; T. Huizinga, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Maassen J, Bergstra S, de Buck P, van Oosterhout M, Allaart C, Huizinga T. The Impact of Flares on Clinical and Patient Reported Outcomes in Rheumatoid and Undifferentiated Arthritis Patients [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-impact-of-flares-on-clinical-and-patient-reported-outcomes-in-rheumatoid-and-undifferentiated-arthritis-patients/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-impact-of-flares-on-clinical-and-patient-reported-outcomes-in-rheumatoid-and-undifferentiated-arthritis-patients/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology