ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 3238

The Impact of Biologic DMARD Treatment on Sepsis and Mortality after Serious Infection

Adrian Richter1, Anja Strangfeld2, Prof. Dr. Matthias Schneider3, Thomas Klopsch4, Andreas Kapelle5, Jörg Kaufmann6, Angela Zink7 and Joachim Listing8, 1German Rheumatism Research Center, Berlin, Germany, 2Epidemiology, German Rheumatism Research Center, Berlin, Germany, 3Rheumatology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Duesseldorf, Germany, 4Rheumatologist in private practice, Neubrandenburg, Germany, 5Rheumatologist, Hoyerswerda, Germany, 6Medical practice specialising, Ludwigsfelde, Germany, 7Epidemiologie, Deutsches Rheuma-Forschungszentrum, Berlin, Germany, 8Epidemiology, DRFZ, Berlin, Germany

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Biologic agents, Infection, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and safety

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Wednesday, November 11, 2015

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Clinical Aspects VI: Death Be Not Proud-Mortality and Treatment Outcomes in RA (Includes 2014 Lee C. Howley, Sr. Prize for Arthritis Research Introductory Talk)

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 9:00AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose:  Tumor-necrosis-factor-α inhibition (TNFi) was assumed to be a relevant mechanism for the treatment of sepsis[1]. However, randomized controlled trials failed to show a survival benefit caused by TNFi in patients with diagnosed sepsis[2].

Methods:  We investigated the outcomes of serious infection (SI, N=1,170) reported in 947 patients in the German biologics register RABBIT (Rheumatoid arthritis: observation of biologic therapy) as: (i) no complication of SI, (ii) sepsis following SI (≤30d), and (iii) death after SI (≤90d). We applied a GEE model for multinomial responses in longitudinal data [3] to evaluate the risks of sepsis and death (accounting for age at SI, sex, physical function, comorbid heart failure or renal disease, glucocorticoid (GC) dose and the disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD)). Biologic (b)DMARDs were grouped as TNFi or other classes of bDMARDs. Sensitivity analyses were applied: [a] in a subset of patients with pneumonia (N=298), [b] by restricting the conventional synthetic (cs)DMARD group to biologic naive patients and [c] by incorporating patients with incomplete data.

Results: 135 of 947 patients with an SI developed sepsis 137 times, 85 of 135 patients died due to sepsis. 53 patients died without known sepsis within 90 days after SI. The adjusted risk (odds ratio (OR)) of sepsis was significantly higher in older patients and in patients with chronic renal disease (Table). Patients with an SI who were exposed to bDMARDs and those with better physical function had a significantly lower risk to develop sepsis (Table). Risk factors of death after SI were higher age, glucocorticoids in high doses and heart failure, patients treated with bDMARDs and those with better physical function had a significantly lower risk of death after SI. Results remained consistent in sensitivity analyses [a-c].

Table: Results of multinomial regression. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) show increase or decrease of the risks of sepsis or death. Reference group: patients with SI but no further complication.

 

Sepsis

Death

OR

95% CI

OR

95% CI

Age (by 10 years)

1.41

[1.15; 1.74]

2.47

[1.61; 3.79]

Sex (male vs female)

0.99

[0.63; 1.55]

1.45

[0.74; 2.83]

% of physical function (10% improvement)

0.92

[0.84; 1.00]

0.86

[0.76; 0.98]

Glucocorticoids (<5 mg/d=Referenz)

 

 

 

 

Glucocorticoids (5- <10 mg/d vs. Ref.)

1.26

[0.82; 1.93]

0.93

[0.47; 1.83]

Glucocorticoids (≥10 mg/d vs. Ref.)

1.66

[0.96; 2.88]

2.40

[1.04; 5.55]

csDMARDs (reference)

 

 

 

 

TNFi

0.64

[0.42; 0.97]

0.48

[0.24; 0.95]

Other bDMARDs

0.45

[0.25; 0.80]

0.16

[0.05; 0.54]

Heart failure (yes vs. no)

1.38

[0.74; 2.56]

3.56

[1.73; 7.33]

Chronic renal disease (yes vs. no)

1.93

[1.19; 3.14]

1.51

[0.72; 3.17]

Conclusion:  Our results suggest a protective effect of bDMARDs in terms of lowering the risk of sepsis after SI if patients were already exposed to bDMARDs at the SI. Further investigation is needed for each class of bDMARDs and separately for bacterial and viral SI.

[1] Waage A, et al. Association between tumour necrosis factor in serum and fatal outcome in patients with meningococcal disease. The Lancet 1987.

[2] Remick DG. Cytokine therapeutics for the treatment of sepsis: why has nothing worked? Current parmaceutical design 2003.

[3] Touloumis A, et al. GEE for Multinomial Responses Using a Local Odds Ratios Parameterization. Biom 2013.


Disclosure: A. Richter, None; A. Strangfeld, AbbVie, Celltrion, Hospira, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD Sharp&Dohme, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB., 2,BMS, Merck-Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, 9; P. D. M. Schneider, Abbvie, Actelion, Merck Serono, Pfizer, Roche, 2,Abbvie, Roche, UCB, 5,Abbvie, Chugai, Roche, Pfizer, UCB, 8; T. Klopsch, None; A. Kapelle, MSD, UCB, Chugai Roche,, 5,Abbvie, Chugai, Roche, MSD, Pfizer, UCB,, 2,Amgen, Pfizer, Abbvie, Chugai, Roche., 9; J. Kaufmann, None; A. Zink, AbbVie, Celltrion, Hospira, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD Sharp&Dohme, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB., 2,BMS, Merck-Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Roche, UCB., 9; J. Listing, AbbVie, Celltrion, Hospira, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD Sharp&Dohme, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB., 2,Pfizer Inc, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Richter A, Strangfeld A, Schneider PDM, Klopsch T, Kapelle A, Kaufmann J, Zink A, Listing J. The Impact of Biologic DMARD Treatment on Sepsis and Mortality after Serious Infection [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-impact-of-biologic-dmard-treatment-on-sepsis-and-mortality-after-serious-infection/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-impact-of-biologic-dmard-treatment-on-sepsis-and-mortality-after-serious-infection/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology