ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 159

The Frequency of Screening and Prevalence of Antiphospholipid Antibodies in the General Population

Giordano Egiziano1, Jessica Widdifield2, Anisur Rahman3, Evelyne Vinet4, Cristiano S. Moura5, Jeffrey R. Curtis6 and Sasha Bernatsky7, 1Department Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada, 2University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada, 3Rayne Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom, 4Divisions of Rheumatology and Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada, 5The Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada, 6University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 7Divisions of Rheumatology and Clinical Epidemiology, The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Anticardiolipin, Antiphospholipid antibodies, epidemiologic methods and population studies

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 21, 2018

Title: Antiphospholipid Syndrome Poster

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is defined by vascular thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity in the presence of persistently circulating antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Those positive for multiple types of aPL have greatest future thrombotic risk. Little is known regarding testing patterns in a population-based sample and whether testing for aPL is done in accordance with the revised Sydney recommendations. We characterized patterns of aPL testing in a large general population sample.

Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis using Truven Health MarketScan® Research Databases, that integrate de-identified patient health data (contributed by large employers, managed care organizations, hospitals, EMR providers, Medicare and Medicaid) including laboratory results on a subset (over 1 million). We used MarketScan lab data from 2010-2015 to identify individuals tested for lupus anticoagulant (LA), anti-cardiolipin (aCL), and anti-beta2-glycoprotein1 (aGP1) antibodies. All subjects were required to be at least 18 years old, having continuous eligibility for medical benefits at least 12 months before and 3 months following the first aPL test.

Results: We identified 33,456 individuals who had had at least one aPL test performed. The distribution of testing is shown in Figure 1. In these 33, 456 individuals, only 6,391 (19%) had been tested for all three tests (LA, aCL, aGP1). Of those 33,456 tested at least once, 5786 (17.3%) were positive for at least one test and 255 of these 5,786 (10.6%) had a confirmatory second finding.

18,370 individuals had one or more LA test, among which 1,291 (7%) were positive initially. Among these 1,291 initially positive, only 996 (77%) were known to have been retested ≥12 weeks later.

24,964 individuals had one or more aCL test, among whom 3,753 (15%) were positive initially. Of those 3,753 initially positive, only 1,707 (45%) were re-tested ≥12 weeks.

11,456 individuals had one or more aGP1 test, among whom 1,304 (11%) were positive initially. Of those 1,304 initially positive, only 537 (41%) were re-tested ≥12 weeks.

Conclusion: In this retrospective claims analysis, and applying revised Sydney criteria for APS diagnosis, we determined that confirmatory aPL testing was performed ≥12 weeks in 77%, 45%, and 41% of initially positive LA, aCL, and aGP1, respectively. In addition, in those individuals who had been tested at least once for any aPL, only 6,391 had been tested for all 3 aPL. These findings highlight that aPL testing may often be incompletely performed. Limitations of these analyses include the possibility that testing was done outside the window for which we had data. Further characterization of testing patterns in individuals with known thrombotic events, pregnancy morbidity, systemic lupus, and other high-risk conditions is warranted and may help to inform local diagnostic practices.

Figure 1: Distribution of testing for LA, aCL, and aGP1


Disclosure: G. Egiziano, None; J. Widdifield, None; A. Rahman, None; E. Vinet, None; C. S. Moura, None; J. R. Curtis, Amgen Inc., 2, 5,AbbVie Inc., 2, 5,BMS, 2, 5,Corrona, LLC, 2, 5,Janssen, 2, 5,Eli Lilly, 2, 5,Myriad, 2, 5,Pfizer, Inc., 2, 5,Roche/Genentech, 2, 5,Radius, 2, 5,UCB, Inc., 2, 5; S. Bernatsky, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Egiziano G, Widdifield J, Rahman A, Vinet E, Moura CS, Curtis JR, Bernatsky S. The Frequency of Screening and Prevalence of Antiphospholipid Antibodies in the General Population [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-frequency-of-screening-and-prevalence-of-antiphospholipid-antibodies-in-the-general-population/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-frequency-of-screening-and-prevalence-of-antiphospholipid-antibodies-in-the-general-population/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology