ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1971

The Four Finger Examination Technique Is Superior To The Standard Two Finger Technique To Detect Metacarpal Phalangeal Joint Swelling In Rheumatoid Arthritis – A Validation By Power Doppler Ultrasound

Mohammed Omair1, Pooneh Akhavan2, Ali Naraghi3, Deborah Weber4, Shikha Mittoo2, Melissa Weber4, Juan Xiong5 and Edward C. Keystone2, 1Mount Sinai Hospital/University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital/University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 3Musculoskeletal Radiology Joint Department of Medical Imaging, Mount Sinai Hospital/University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 4Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, 5Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Physical examination and ultrasound

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Imaging in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:

Swollen joints (SJs) are a strong clinical predictor of radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The metacarpal phalangeal joints (MCP) SJs are particularly relevant since they are the earliest joints demonstrating radiographic progression. Thus, more sensitive detection of less obvious SJs is important for improved assessment of disease activity.

A novel four finger (FF) examination technique was developed to be more sensitive than the two finger (TF) technique in the detection of less clinically apparent joint swelling.

Methods:

To compare the sensitivity of the FF vs. TF technique to detect synovitis by ultrasound (US). We compared the FF vs. TF examination technique in 180 MCPs in 18 RA patients. The population was comprised of 94.4% females, mean age of 55.8 years and mean disease duration of 19.9 yrs. Patients were examined twice on the same day by 4 rheumatologists; 2 performed FF and 2 used the TF technique. SJs were determined by palpation defined by being either (1) ballotable or (2) spongy (non-ballotable swelling). TJs were also assessed. We evaluated the agreement between the SJ/TJ examination techniques with US using grey scale, power Doppler (PD) positivity, or the presence of an effusion.

Results: Consistent with previous literature, the inter-observer agreement (IA) using Kappa statistics was poor to moderate for both SJ techniques. We therefore evaluated only joints in which there was agreement between the 2 examiners for each SJ technique. With the TF and FF techniques respectively, there were 115 & 134 SJs in which there was agreement for the joints being ballotable and 99 & 122 SJs for being spongy. The Kappa agreement between FF and TF techniques respectively, for ballottement by PD was 0.55 vs 0.27; by grey scale 0.35 vs. 0.12, and by effusion: 0.18 vs. 0.08. For SJ detected by being spongy, the relationship between FF and TF was the same, but the Kappas were lower. The agreement between TJs and US was extremely poor with mean Kappas for the 4 examiners for PD of 0.07; for grey scale: 0.06 and for effusion: -0.08.

Conclusion:

The results of this study demonstrate that for MCPs, the FF technique is more sensitive than the TF technique for detection of synovitis as determined by US and therefore a better examination technique for clinical decision making. Of significance, the data provide strong support for the importance of detecting SJs (rather than TJs) as a prognostic guide for structural damage in RA.


Disclosure:

M. Omair,
None;

P. Akhavan,
None;

A. Naraghi,
None;

D. Weber,
None;

S. Mittoo,
None;

M. Weber,
None;

J. Xiong,
None;

E. C. Keystone,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-four-finger-examination-technique-is-superior-to-the-standard-two-finger-technique-to-detect-metacarpal-phalangeal-joint-swelling-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-a-validation-by-power-doppler-ultr/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology