ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2283

The Evolving Use Of Biologic Monotherapy In Rheumatoid Arthritis and Its Impact On Patient Outcomes

Laurent Chanroux, Katrina Johnson and Joan Casellas, Therapy Watch, The Research Partnership, London, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Biologics, combination therapies, Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, outcome measures and treatment options

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis-Clinical Aspects III: Outcome Measures, Socioeconomy, Screening, Biomarkers in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:

The aim of our study is to understand whether the use of biologic monotherapy among rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients is increasing and whether this has any impact on their potential outcomes when compared to combination therapy with traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs).

Methods: We used data collected as part of an online treatment survey conducted among a panel of rheumatologists between May 2008 and December 2012 across the five largest EU countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK). We selected a sub-sample of  43,193 patient records from this data set. Patient cases were selected if a patient was currently prescribed his or her first ever biologic. This limited any confounding effects due to patients’ previous biologic experience. No other screening criteria or quotas were applied to the data to ensure a natural fall-out of monotherapy patients. Patient demographics and key indicators of current health and quality of life were analysed including: disease activity score (DAS), overall joint count, perceived disease severity at diagnosis and latest consultation (assessed by physician), ability to work and current co-morbidities.

Results:

In Q4 2012, 24% of reported biologic patients were currently treated without the concomitant use of traditional DMARDs, a non-significant increase over the level observed in Q2 2008 (23%).  The use of biologic monotherapy was most common for patients treated with tocilizumab (42%) and was most frequently seen among our Italian and UK patients (26%). Monotherapy patients were on average significantly older (> 60 years old) and were perceived to have milder disease at diagnosis when compared to patients simultaneously treated with biologics and DMARDs. In addition, monotherapy patients were significantly more likely to have inflammatory back pain, ankylosing spondylitis, congestive heart failure and wider cardiovascular disease, whereas fibromyalgia and dactylitis were more common in patients receiving combination therapy. There were no differences in patients’ gender, time since diagnosis and ability to work or the number of DMARDs patients had tried prior to initiating their biologic. However, when adjusting for disease severity at diagnosis, we saw no difference in physicians’ perceptions of the current disease severity of patients from both groups, although a significantly higher proportion of monotherapy patients had a DAS < 2.6 (51%) while a significantly greater proportion of combination therapy patients has a DAS > 5.1 (7%).

Conclusion:

Our data show that the use of biologic monotherapy has remained steady over the last four years and has been concentrated primarily among tocilizumab patients. Biologic monotherapy appears to be reserved for older, potentially more fragile patients with milder disease whereas combination therapy may still be preferred for patients with more severe forms of RA. Moreover, use of biologic monotherapy does not seem to negatively impact on patient outcomes with a significantly higher proportion of these patients achieving disease remission.


Disclosure:

L. Chanroux,
None;

K. Johnson,
None;

J. Casellas,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-evolving-use-of-biologic-monotherapy-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-and-its-impact-on-patient-outcomes/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology