ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1879

The Efficacy of Pregabalin for Treating Fibromyalgia Patients with Moderate or Severe Baseline Widespread Pain

Andrew Clair and Birol Emir, Pfizer Inc, New York, NY

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: drug treatment, fibromyalgia, pain management and severity

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Fibromyalgia, Soft Tissue Disorders, Regional and Specific Clinical Pain Syndromes II: Clinical Perspectives

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Pregabalin has demonstrated efficacy for the treatment of fibromyalgia (FM), but insufficient evidence exists on how the efficacy of pregabalin may differ by baseline pain severity. The objective of these analyses was to assess the efficacy of 12 weeks of pregabalin treatment to provide symptomatic pain relief in FM patients with moderate or severe baseline pain scores.

Methods:  These analyses used data from 5 Phase III clinical trials ranging between 8–15 weeks of pregabalin versus placebo (study numbers 1008105, A0081056, A0081077, A0081100, A0081208) to evaluate the efficacy of pregabalin at doses of 300 mg/day, 450 mg/day, or flexible dosing (300-450 mg/day BID) for the treatment of FM. FM was defined by ACR 1990 criteria at screening of widespread pain ≥3 months and pain in ≥11 of 18 specific tender point sites. Patients were adult (aged ≥18 years), with mean baseline pain scores that were classified as moderate (≥4-<7) or severe (≥7-10) and a score ≥40 mm on the Visual Analog Scale of Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire.  A mixed effects model repeated measures analysis was used to estimate change in pain at 12 weeks after treatment initiation by baseline severity (moderate or severe) and treatment.

 

Results:  Overall, 679 (300 mg/d pregabalin), 670 (450 mg/d pregabalin), 250 (flexible dosing pregabalin), and 927 (placebo) patients were evaluated. The results of change in pain score at 12 weeks are displayed in the figure.

fig1.jpg

Among patients who had moderate baseline pain, significantly larger mean ± SE reductions in pain score were observed with pregabalin versus placebo at doses of 450 mg/d (-0.572 ± 0.161, P<0.001) and flexible dosing (-0.647 ± 0.203, P=0.002) with a non-significant reduction at the 300 mg/d dose (-0.282 ± 0.165). Patients with severe baseline pain showed significant improvements over placebo with pregabalin doses of 300 mg/d (-0.516 ± 0.164, P=0.002) and 450 mg/d (-0.822 ± 0.165, P<0.001), but not with flexible dosing (-0.200 ± 0.242). When patients were grouped by pregabalin dose assignment, patients with severe baseline pain exhibited greater improvements in pain score than patients with moderate baseline pain with 300 mg/day (-0.461 ± 0.191, P=0.016) and 450 mg/day doses (-0.476 ± 0.189, P=0.012), but not with flexible dosing (+0.220 ± 0.272).

 

Conclusion: Pregabalin is efficacious at 12 weeks of treatment in reducing pain in FM patients with baseline moderate pain and severe pain severity, with reductions that appear larger in patients with severe pain. The trend of larger changes following flexible dosing in patients with moderate versus severe baseline pain scores comes from a study of Japanese patients and additional research would be required to determine if this may be accounted for by differences in the average daily dose. 


Disclosure:

A. Clair,

Pfizer Inc,

3,

Pfizer Inc,

1;

B. Emir,

Pfizer Inc.,

1,

Pfizer Inc.,

3.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-efficacy-of-pregabalin-for-treating-fibromyalgia-patients-with-moderate-or-severe-baseline-widespread-pain/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology