ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2469

The Efficacy and Safety of Tocilizumab Subcutaneous Q2W and Following Escalation from Q2W to QW Therapy in Combination with Traditional Dmards in Patients with Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis at 96 Weeks

Alan Kivitz1, Ewa Olech2, Michael A. Borofsky3, Beatriz M. Zazueta4, Federico Navarro-Sarabia5, S. C. Radominski6, Joan T. Merrill7, Jinglan Pei8, Lucy Rowell9, Clare Nasmyth-Miller9, Sunethra Wimalasundera9 and Janet E. Pope10, 1Altoona Arthritis & Osteoporosis Center, Duncansville, PA, 2Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Nevada School of Medicine, Las Vegas, NV, 3Clinical Research Center of Reading, Reading, PA, 4Reumatologia, Centro de Investigacion en Enfermedades Reumaticas, Mexicali, Mexico, 5Rheumatology, University Hospital Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain, 6Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil, 7Clinical Pharmacology Research Program, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK, 8Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, 9Roche, Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom, 10St Joseph Health Care, London, ON, Canada

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Clinical and tocilizumab

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy: Therapeutic Strategies, Biomarkers and Predictors of Outcomes in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose : The BREVACTA study assessed the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous tocilizumab (TCZ SC) in patients (pts) with RA who had an inadequate response to ≥ 1 DMARD (21% previously failed  aTNF therapy). The primary objective assessed efficacy and safety to Week 24. Superiority over placebo (PBO) was observed, with a safety profile comparable to intravenous (IV) TCZ. We now report the efficacy and safety data for TCZ SC every 2 weeks (q2w) and TCZ weekly (qw) following escalation from either TCZ q2w or PBO q2w to Week 96.

Methods: This phase 3, randomized, multicenter, parallel arm study included a 24 week double blind, PBO controlled period followed by a 72 week open label phase and a further 8 weeks of safety follow up. Pts were initially randomized 2:1 to receive TCZ SC 162 mg q2w (n=437) or PBO SC q2w (n=219) via prefilled syringe (PFS) with prestudy DMARD(s). At Week 24, pts in both arms were rerandomized 1:1 to receive open label TCZ SC q2w via PFS or autoinjector pen. These data focus on pts who were rerandomised at Week 24 and received TCZ SC regardless of injection device. Escape therapy with TCZ SC qw was available for pts with an inadequate efficacy response from Week 12. At the first dose on escape therapy pts were rebaselined; efficacy is from time of escape up to Week 84 and safety is from time of escape to the end of the study.

Results :  In the open label phase,  338 pts (77%) were maintained on TCZ SC q2w and 119 (54%) switched from the PBO to TCZ SC q2w. For the escape pts, in the double blind phase, 72 (16.5%) escaped from the TCZ arm and 90 (41.3%) from the PBO arm, while in the open label phase 27 (5.9%) escaped from the TCZ SC q2w arm. In the TCZ q2w arm, the proportion of pts who achieved ACR20/50/70 responses increased up to Week 96. In the TCZ q2w arm, the rates of AEs and SAEs, including serious infections, remained stable or decreased up to Week 96. No anaphylaxis or serious hypersensitivity occurred. By Week 96, 31 pts (7.1%) withdrew due to AEs and 7 pts (1.6%) died.  Nine pts (2.1%) developed antiTCZ antibodies postbaseline without loss of efficacy or clinically significant hypersensitivity. For escape pts, the proportion of pts who achieved an ACR20 response increased after escape in both the TCZ or PBO arms;  although there was a higher ACR20 response in escape pts from the PBO arm than the TCZ q2w arm (86.4% and 63%, respectively) at Week 84. The rate of AEs per 100 pt years, following escape therapy was similar between pts who previously received TCZ or PBO (331.9 and 360.5, respectively) and comparable to the TCZ q2w arm (332.8).

Conclusion: TCZ SC q2w demonstrated long term efficacy, including sustained ACR responses over 96 weeks. The AE profile for TCZ SC at 96 weeks was comparable to 24 weeks. For escape pts, there were improvements in ACR20 response rates in pts who previously received PBO and escalated from q2w to qw. TCZ SC will offer an alternative route of administration and the possibility of self administration for pts with RA.

TCZ SC q2w + DMARD

Week 24

(N = 437)

TCZ SC q2w + DMARD

Week 96

(N = 437)

Randomized, n

437

437

Rerandomized at Week 24, n (%)

338 (77)

338 (77)

Intention to treat (ITT)a

437

338

Withdrew from TCZ SC q2w regimen (ITT)a, n (%)

26 (6)

67 (15)

Withdrew from escape therapy,c n (%)

2 (<1)

2 (<1)

Efficacy (completer population)b                                                                              N = 279

ACR20, %

61

82

ACR50, %

40

66

ACR70, %

20

48

Safety (safety population),d rate/100 PY (95% CI) [no. events]

Patient years of exposure

182.68

615.95

N

437

 437

Rate of AEs per 100 PY

439.56 (409.68, 471.04) [803]

332.82 (318.57, 347.55) [2050]

Rate of SAEs per 100 PY

13.68 (8.86, 20.20) [25]

 11.20 (8.72, 14.18) [69]

Rate of serious infections per 100 PY

6.57 (3.39, 11.40) [12]

3.24 (1.98, 5.01) [20]

Rate of injection site reactions per 100 PY

31.20 (23.63, 40.43) [57]

 19.81 (16.45, 23.65) [122]

 Anti-TCZ antibodies, n (%)

7 (1.6)

9 (2.1)

Rate of withdrawals due to AEs

 4.93 (2.25, 9.35) [9]

5.52 (3.82, 7.71) [34]

Rate of deaths

1.64 (0.34, 4.80) [3]

1.14 (0.46, 2.34) [7]

AE, adverse events; DMARD, disease-modifying antirheumatic drug; PY, patient years; q2w, every other week; SAE, serious adverse events; SC, subcutaneous; TCZ, tocilizumab.

a ITT population at Week 96 comprised all pts who completed Week 24, were re-randomized at Week 24, and received at least one dose of re-randomized study treatment (338 pts)

b Completer population included all patients who met the ITT criteria and additionaly completed up to Week 96 (279 pts).

c Escape therapy with TCZ SC qw (PFS) was available for pts who had < 20% improvement from baseline in both swollen joint count (SJC) and tender joint count (TJC) between Weeks 12 -48 or who had < 70% improvement from baseline in both SJC and TJC after Week 48, could receive open-label TCZ SC 162 mg every week (qw). Escape pts were not rerandomized to PFS or AI at Week 24 and remained on TCZ SC qw using the PFS for the remainder of the study. Escape pts were rebaselined, such that their first dose on qw = baseline.  

d The safety population included all pts (n = 437) who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-dose safety assessment.


Disclosure:

A. Kivitz,

AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Celgene, Genentech, Janssen, Pfizer, UCB,

2,

BMS, Genentech, UCB,

5,

BMS,

8;

E. Olech,

Genentech,

2,

Genentech ,

5;

M. A. Borofsky,
None;

B. M. Zazueta,
None;

F. Navarro-Sarabia,

Roche, Pfizer, UCB, Abbott and Meiji Seika,

5,

Roche, Pfizer, UCB, Abbott and Meiji Seika,

8;

S. C. Radominski,

Pfizer, Astra Zeneca, Celltrion, Amgen, Roche, Novartis,

2,

Pfizer, Astra Zeneca, Janssen, BMS ,

5,

Pfizer, Astra Zeneca, BMS, GSK, Janssen,

8;

J. T. Merrill,

Genentech, Roche,

5;

J. Pei,

Genentech ,

3;

L. Rowell,

Roche ,

3;

C. Nasmyth-Miller,

Roche ,

3;

S. Wimalasundera,

Roche ,

3;

J. E. Pope,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-efficacy-and-safety-of-tocilizumab-subcutaneous-q2w-and-following-escalation-from-q2w-to-qw-therapy-in-combination-with-traditional-dmards-in-patients-with-moderate-to-severe-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology