ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1502

The Effect of Tofacitinib on Residual Pain in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis

Maxime Dougados1, Désirée van der Heijde 2, Clifton Bingham 3, Peter Taylor 4, Lara Fallon 5, John Woolcott 6, Yves Brault 7, Lisy Wang 8 and Meriem Kessouri 7, 1Cochin Hospital, Paris, France, 2Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands, 3Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 4University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, 5Pfizer Inc, Montreal, QC, Canada, 6Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA, 7Pfizer Inc, Paris, France, 8Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: psoriatic arthritis and pain, Tofacitinib

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 11, 2019

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Clinical Poster II: Treatment of Axial Spondyloarthritis & Psoriatic Arthritis

Session Type: Poster Session (Monday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Current treatments for PsA have proven effective in reducing patient (pt)-reported pain;1,2 however, residual pain often remains. Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of PsA. This descriptive analysis evaluated the effect of tofacitinib, adalimumab and placebo on residual pain in pts with PsA whose inflammation was attenuated after 3 months of therapy.

Methods: Data were included from OPAL Broaden (NCT01877668), a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 3 trial of 12 months’ duration in pts with PsA.3 Pts were randomized to receive tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily (BID), tofacitinib 10 mg BID, adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneous injection every 2 weeks (Q2W), or placebo. This analysis assessed pts with ‘residual pain’ at Month (M)3. Residual pain was considered as pain in pts with complete attenuation of inflammation at M3, defined by a swollen joint count (SJC) of 0 and CRP levels < 6 mg/L. Pain was measured by a visual analog scale (VAS; 0 [“no pain”] – 100 mm [“most severe pain”]). Changes in pain from baseline to M3 and residual pain (VAS pain reported at M3) were assessed.

Results: Demographics and baseline disease characteristics have previously been reported in the primary study, and were generally similar between treatment groups.3 At M3, 99/422 (23.5%) pts with PsA had achieved SJC of 0 and CRP < 6 mg/L. At M3, more tofacitinib-treated (tofacitinib 5 mg BID, n=23/107 [21.5%]; tofacitinib 10 mg BID, n=33/104 [31.7%]) and adalimumab-treated pts (n=30/106 [28.3%]) achieved SJC of 0 and CRP < 6 mg/L vs placebo (n=13/105 [12.4%]). Baseline pain appeared numerically higher in the tofacitinib treatment group (tofacitinib 5 mg BID = 54.7 mm; tofacitinib 10 mg BID = 58.4 mm) vs adalimumab (47.7 mm) and placebo (50.4 mm). In pts who achieved SJC of 0 and CRP < 6 mg/L at M3, improvements in pain from baseline to M3 appeared numerically greater in pts receiving tofacitinib vs those receiving placebo (Figure 1a). When considering absolute (residual) pain at M3, mean residual pain was similar across treatment groups (ranging from 22.7–29.2 mm; Figure 1b), despite a higher baseline pain in tofacitinib treatment groups.

Conclusion: Changes from baseline in pain and absolute pain at M3 suggest that in pts with PsA whose inflammation has been completely attenuated, tofacitinib might have an effect on residual pain not obviously attributable to inflammation. However, the sample population was small, and there were large standard deviations. To confirm these results and to understand the mechanisms by which tofacitinib may improve residual pain, a meta-analysis will be performed, using individual participant data from pts with rheumatic disease who have participated in tofacitinib randomized controlled trials.

  1. Gladman DD et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2007; 66: 163-168.
  2. Gladman D et al. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2014; 66: 1085-1092.
  3. Mease P et al. N Engl J Med 2017; 377: 1537-1550.

Acknowledgments: Study sponsored by Pfizer Inc. Medical writing support was provided by Mark Bennett of CMC Connect and funded by Pfizer Inc.


Disclosure: M. Dougados, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, Amgen, 5, Biogen, 5, BMS, 2, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 8, Gilead, 2, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, Merck, 2, 5, Merck Inc, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer Inc, 2, 5, Roche, 2, 5, 8, UCB, 2, 5, 8; D. van der Heijde, AbbVie, 5, AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, BMS, 5, Amgen, 5, Astellas, 5, 9, Astellas Pharma, 5, AstraZeneca, 5, BMS, 5, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Daiichi, Eli-Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda, UCB, 5, Boehringer-Ingelheim, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5, Celgene, 5, Daiichi, 5, 9, Daiichi Sankyo, 5, Director of Imaging Rheumatology, 6, Director of Imaging Rheumatology bv, 9, Eli Lilly, 5, Eli Lilly and Company, 5, Eli-Lilly, 5, Galapagos, 5, Gilead, 5, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 5, Glaxo-Smith-Kline, 5, GSK, 5, 8, Imaging Rheumatology bv, 9, Imaging Rheumatology BV, 9, Imaging Rheumatology bv., 9, Janssen, 5, 8, Janssen Pharmaceutica, 5, Merck, 5, 8, Novartis, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, 8, Pfizer Inc, 5, Regeneron, 5, 8, Rheumatology bv, 4, 9, Roche, 5, 8, Sanofi, 5, 8, Takeda, 5, 8, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, 5, UCB, 5, 8, UCB Pharma, 5; C. Bingham, Abbvie, 5, AbbVie, 5, BMS, 2, 5, Bristol Meyer Squibb, 2, 5, Bristol Myers-Squibb, 2, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 5, Eli/Lilly, 5, Genentech/Roche, 5, Janssen, 5, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 2, Pfizer Inc, 5, Regeneron/Sanofi, 5, Sanofi/Regeneron, 5; P. Taylor, AbbVie, 5, Abbvie, 5, Biogen, 5, Celgene, 2, 5, Eli Lilly and Company, 2, 5, Fresenius, 5, Fresenius SE & Co, 5, Fresnius, 5, Galapagos, 2, 5, Gilead, 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, Lilly, 2, 5, Nordic Pharma, 5, NORDIC Pharma, 5, Pfizer, 5, Pfizer Inc, 5, Roche, 5, Sanofi, 5, UCB, 5; L. Fallon, Pfizer Inc, 1, 3; J. Woolcott, Pfizer Inc, 1, 3; Y. Brault, Pfizer Inc, 1, 3; L. Wang, Pfizer Inc, 1, 3; M. Kessouri, Pfizer Inc, 1, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Dougados M, van der Heijde D, Bingham C, Taylor P, Fallon L, Woolcott J, Brault Y, Wang L, Kessouri M. The Effect of Tofacitinib on Residual Pain in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-effect-of-tofacitinib-on-residual-pain-in-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-effect-of-tofacitinib-on-residual-pain-in-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology