ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 975

The Effect of TNF Inhibition on Radiographic Progression in Ankylosing Spondylitis: An Observational Cohort Study of 374 Patients

Walter Maksymowych1, Yufei Zheng2, Stephanie Wichuk1, Sasha Bernatsky3, Praveena Chiowchanwisawakit4 and Robert G Lambert5, 1Medicine, Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 2Alberta Institute of Health Economics, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 3Rheum/Clin. Epid., McGill MUHC/RVH, Montreal, QC, Canada, 4Rheumatology, Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand, 5Radiology, Radiology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: anti-TNF therapy, radiography and spondylarthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2015

Title: Spondylarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis - Clinical Aspects and Treatment: Treatment of AS

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:30PM-4:00PM

Background/Purpose: An analysis of radiographic
progression in an observational cohort has suggested that anti-TNF therapy lessens
radiographic progression, especially when treatment is introduced within 5
years of AS onset, although development of new syndesmophytes
was not reported1. We aimed to assess the impact of anti-TNF therapy
on radiographic progression in an observational cohort of AS by analyzing
propensity-matched patients.

Methods: In the FOllow-up
Research Cohort in AS (FORCAST), 374 patients with AS from Northern Alberta
attending community and academic rheumatology practices have been assessed over
a mean follow up of 3.1 years for clinical and laboratory outcomes every 6
months, and had spinal radiography at baseline and follow up. Patients received
standard (n=147) or anti-TNF therapy (n=227). Radiographs
were scored by two readers using the mSASSS with
adjudication by a third reader according to pre-specified rules
. The
impact of anti-TNF therapy was assessed using univariate
and multivariate Tobit regression for mSASSS data and Poisson regression for development of new syndesmophytes. Propensity matching was
based on a caliper of 0.1 in a logistic model using age,
gender, disease duration, smoking, mSASSS, and
pre-treatment BASDAI and CRP. Multiple propensity score analysis based on
multinomial logistic
regression was used to compare treatment groups according to disease duration
before start of anti-TNF. Missing values were imputed using the multiple imputation by chained equations (MICE) method.

Results: Subjects were predominantly males (74.9%)
of mean (SD) age 43.0 (11.9) years, mean (SD) disease duration 21.4 (11.6) years,
mean (SD) baseline mSASSS of 17.1 (18.4), mean (SD)
radiographic progression of 0.97 (1.31) mSASSS unit/year,
and 38.4% developed a new syndesmophyte. After
propensity matching using baseline covariates 218 and 230 patients could be
included in the post-match analysis of mSASSS
progression and new syndesmophytes, respectively.
These numbers were 158 and 190, respectively, after tighter matching using
pre-treatment covariates. In univariate analyses of
propensity-matched cases, significant predictors were baseline mSASSS and pre-treatment,ASDAS for mSASSS
progression, and baseline mSASSS and age for new syndesmophyte.  In
the final multivariable Tobit and Poisson regression
models using propensity-matched data, only pre-treatment ASDAS was a
significant predictor of mSASSS progression (β=0.40 [95%CI: 0.08-0.72]; p=0.014). Multiple propensity
score adjusted analyses demonstrated significantly less radiographic
progression in patients who received anti-TNF within 5 years of disease onset versus
those on standard therapy or treated with anti-TNF after >10 years of
disease (Table).

Conclusion: A beneficial effect of anti-TNF
treatment may be evident in AS patients receiving treatment within 5 years of
disease onset.

1.    
Haroon et al. Arthritis Rheum 2013; 65:
2645-54.

Significant variables in multiple propensity analysis

Coefficient

95% CI

P value

Baseline mSASSS

0.018

0.003 – 0.032

0.015

Baseline ASDAS

0.24

0.031 – 0.45

0.024

Time between disease onset and anti-TNF start:

No anti-TNF

<5 years

5-10 years

>10 years

REF

-1.41

-0.34

-0.17

-2.56 – -0.25

-1.30 – 0.62

-0.70 – 0.36

0.017

0.49

0.53

Time between disease onset and anti-TNF start:

No anti-TNF

<5 years

5-10 years

>10 years

0.17

-1.24

-0.17

REF

-0.36 – 0.70

-2.45 –  -0.022

-1.16 – 0.82

0.53

0.046

0.74


Disclosure: W. Maksymowych, Abbvie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Llilly and Company, Janssen Pharmaceutica Product, L.P., Pfizer, UCB, 5,Abbvie, 2; Y. Zheng, None; S. Wichuk, None; S. Bernatsky, None; P. Chiowchanwisawakit, None; R. G. Lambert, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Maksymowych W, Zheng Y, Wichuk S, Bernatsky S, Chiowchanwisawakit P, Lambert RG. The Effect of TNF Inhibition on Radiographic Progression in Ankylosing Spondylitis: An Observational Cohort Study of 374 Patients [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-effect-of-tnf-inhibition-on-radiographic-progression-in-ankylosing-spondylitis-an-observational-cohort-study-of-374-patients/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-effect-of-tnf-inhibition-on-radiographic-progression-in-ankylosing-spondylitis-an-observational-cohort-study-of-374-patients/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology