ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 902

The Effect Of Obesity On Physical Function: The Osteoarthritis Initiative Study

Jingbo Niu1, Daniel K. White2, David T. Felson3, Michael C. Nevitt4 and Yuqing Zhang3, 1Clinical Epidemiology Research and Training Unit, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 2Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 3Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 4Epidemiology & Biostatistics, UCSF (University of California, San Francisco), San Francisco, CA

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Functions and obesity

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Epidemiology and Public Health

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ARHP)

Background/Purpose: Previous studies assessing relationship between obesity and physical function used linear regression model that assumes effects of obesity on physical function were the same across the distribution of outcome variable. However, if this assumption is not true, linear regression model may fail to reveal important associations and fail to identify persons who might be best targeted for obesity modification. Quantile regression provides a more complete picture of the relationship between obesity and physical function when both lower and upper or all quantiles are of interest. We used quantile regression to examine the distribution-specific effect of obesity on physical function.  

Methods: The Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) Study is an observational study of people 45-79 years with or at high risk of knee osteoarthritis. Body Mass Index (BMI) was calculated from standardized assessments of height and weight and categorized into 3 groups: normal (< 25kg/m2), overweight (25 – <30 kg/m2), and obese (≥30 kg/m2). Physical function was measured with knee-specific WOMAC function (range: 0-68) at the 12-month visit. The knee with higher (worse) WOMAC function score was used to represent a person’s function level. We performed sex-specific quantile regression models to assess association between BMI categories and WOMAC function percentiles from 30th to 90th with increase by 10th adjusting for age, race, and CES-D score. We also performed a traditional linear regression model.

Results: 4,243 subjects (mean age 62.3, 58% women, 81% Whites, mean CES-D score 62.3) were included in analysis. In men, WOMAC function score among obese subjects was > 6 units worse at the 70th, 80th, and 90th percentile, but only 0.4 unit worse at the 30th percentile compared with the score for those in a normal BMI category. Similarly, WOMAC function score among obese women was > 9 units worse at the 70th, 80th, and 90th percentile, but only 2.2 units worse at the 30th percentile of WOAMC physical function score than score for those in a normal BMI category. A similar pattern was observed for subjects who were overweight though with attenuated effects (see table).  Such findings were not revealed when using a linear regression approach. 

Conclusion: Using quantile regression model we demonstrated that the magnitude of association between obesity and physical function score was greater among subjects with worse physical function than those with better function. When research interest focuses on bounded outcomes, such as pain or function assessed with visual analogue scale, quantile regression models may provide more valuable insights into the relationships than methods that use single summary effect measure, such as difference in mean or median.  

Table. WOMAC function score and BMI categories (normal BMI as reference)

Mean /

percentiles of

WOMAC function score

Men

Women

overweight

obesity

overweight

obesity

beta (95% CI)

beta (95% CI)

beta (95% CI)

beta (95% CI)

mean

1.81 (0.60 , 3.03)†

3.77 (2.50 , 5.05)‡

1.94 (0.85 , 3.02)‡

5.94 (4.83 , 7.04)‡

30th

0 (-0.13 , 0.13)

0.42 (0.04 , 0.79)*

0.13 (-0.04 , 0.30)

2.20 (1.69 , 2.72)‡

40th

0.12 (-0.09 , 0.34)

1.07 (0.66 , 1.49)‡

0.60 (0.14 , 1.06)*

3.85 (3.21 , 4.49)‡

50th

0.67 (0 , 1.33) *

2.09 (1.22 , 2.97)‡

1.05 (0.35 , 1.75)†

5.10 (4.20 , 6.01)‡

60th

1.83 (0.81 , 2.84)‡

4.25 (2.65 , 5.84)‡

2.10 (0.98 , 3.22)‡

6.98 (5.45 , 8.50)‡

70th

2.54 (1.01 , 4.07)†

6.30 (4.20 , 8.39)‡

3.22 (1.52 , 4.93)‡

9.20 (7.26 , 11.14)‡

80th

3.46 (1.21 , 5.71)†

8.01(5.60 , 10.42)‡

3.99 (2.00 , 5.99)‡

10.49 (8.47 , 12.52)‡

90th

3.53 (-0.09 , 7.15)

8.65 (4.59 , 12.71)‡

5.21 (2.62 , 7.81)‡

11.42 (8.52 , 14.31)‡

*P-value <0.05, †P-value <0.01, ‡P-value <0.001


Disclosure:

J. Niu,
None;

D. K. White,
None;

D. T. Felson,
None;

M. C. Nevitt,
None;

Y. Zhang,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-effect-of-obesity-on-physical-function-the-osteoarthritis-initiative-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology