ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 254

The Effect of Milnacipran on Pain in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with Widespread Pain:  a Randomized Blinded Crossover Trial

Yvonne C. Lee1, Elena Massarotti2, Robert R. Edwards3, Bing Lu4, Chih-Chin Liu5, Yuanyu Lo4, Alyssa Wohlfahrt4, Nancy Kim6, Daniel J. Clauw7 and Daniel H. Solomon8, 1Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 2Rheumatology/PBB-3, Brigham & Women's Hosp, Boston, MA, 3Anesthesiology, Brigham & Womens Hospital, Chestnut Hill, MA, 4Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 5Rheumatology & Immunology, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 6Div of Rheumatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, 7Anesthesiology/Internal Medicine (Rheum), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 8Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: clinical trials, pain, pain management and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Pain: Basic and Clinical Aspects

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Clinical trials have shown that serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, such as milnacipran, decrease pain in chronic non-inflammatory pain conditions like fibromyalgia and osteoarthritis. We examined the effect of milnacipran on self-reported pain intensity and experimental pain sensitivity among rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with widespread pain on a stable treatment regimen.

Methods: Thirty-two subjects with RA completed a double-blind, crossover study. Subjects were randomized to receive milnacipran 50 mg twice daily or placebo for 6 weeks, followed by a 3-week washout and crossed over to the other arm for the remaining 6 weeks. Subjects completed the Brief Pain Inventory – short form (BPI-sf) to assess self-reported pain intensity and the Symptom Intensity Scale (SIS) to assess symptoms of fibromyalgia. Subjects also underwent quantitative assessments of pressure pain thresholds at joint and non-joint sites, using a Wagner FPK 20 algometer. Pain thresholds at the trapezius were measured before and after a noxious conditioning stimulus to assess conditioned pain modulation, a measure of the descending analgesic pain pathways. The primary outcome was change in self-reported pain, measured by the BPI-sf average pain intensity. Secondary outcomes included changes in the SIS score, pain thresholds and conditioned pain modulation. Changes in pain measures were compared between milnacipran and placebo using Wilcoxon signed rank tests and linear mixed models.

Results: After 6 weeks of milnacipran, BPI-sf average pain intensity decreased 0.7 (SD 1.7) points on a 0-10 scale, compared to a decrease of 0.3 (SD 2.0) after 6 weeks of placebo (P = 0.37) (Table). Thumbnail pressure pain threshold increased by 0.7 (SD 1.4) during milnacipran treatment compared to -0.02 (SD 1.4) during placebo (P = 0.04). None of the other secondary outcome measures differed significantly between treatment periods. In the subgroup of subjects with swollen joint count less than or equal to 1, BPI-sf average pain intensity decreased 1.0 (SD 1.6) points, compared to an increase of 0.1 (SD 1.9) during placebo (P = 0.04). In this subgroup, the increase in thumbnail pressure pain threshold was also significantly higher during milnacipran treatment compared to placebo (P = 0.003).

Conclusion: This randomized, blinded cross-over trial of milnacipran vs. placebo revealed no overall differences in improvements in pain intensity, fibromyalgia symptoms and experimentally assessed pain measures. Subgroup analyses among patients with 0-1 swollen joints suggested that milnacipran may have a role in diminishing overall pain among RA patients who have minimal evidence of inflammatory disease activity.  This finding needs to be replicated in a larger study, designed specifically to examine the effects of milnacipran among RA patients in remission or with low disease activity.


Table: Means (standard deviations) for measures of pain

Placebo

Milnacipran

P-values

Baseline

6-weeks

Change

Baseline

6-weeks

Change

Unadjustedb

Adjustedc

BPI-sf Average Pain Intensitya

5.2 (2.1)

4.9 (2.1)

-0.3 (2.0)

5.6 (2.0)

4.8 (2.2)

-0.7 (1.7)

0.42

0.37

Symptom Intensity Scale

5.1 (2.1)

4.3 (2.4)

-0.8 (1.9)

5.2 (2.0)

4.5 (8.3)

-0.7 (1.6)

0.89

0.83

Thumbnail Pain Threshold

5.8 (3.0)

5.8 (2.8)

-0.02 (1.4)

5.3 (2.7)

6.0 (2.8)

0.7 (1.4)

0.04

0.04

Trapezius Pain Threshold

4.9 (2.8)

5.5 (3.1)

0.6 (1.5)

5.1 (3.1)

5.5 (3.1)

0.4 (1.3)

0.89

0.44

Wrist Pain Threshold

5.3 (2.7)

5.9 (3.0)

0.6 (1.6)

5.0 (2.4)

5.9 (2.9)

0.9 (1.5)

0.35

0.34

Knee Pain Threshold

7.0 (3.1)

7.3 (3.1)

0.3 (1.8)

6.9 (3.2)

7.3 (3.2)

0.3 (1.4)

0.72

0.82

Conditioned Pain Modulation

0.8 (1.0)

0.9 (1.3)

0.1 (1.2)

0.8 (1.1)

0.9 (1.1)

0.1 (1.5)

 0.39

0.96

Abbreviations: BPI-sf, Brief Pain Inventory – short form.

a Based on a 0-10 scale with 10 being worse pain.

b P-values for the difference between the values during milnacipran vs. placebo using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.

c P-values for the difference between the values during milnacipran vs. placebo using linear mixed models including treatment, crossover period and treatment sequence.


Disclosure:

Y. C. Lee,

Forest Research Institute,

2,

Merck Pharmaceuticals,

1,

Cubist Pharmaceuticals,

1,

Perrigo,

1,

Express Scripts,

1;

E. Massarotti,

Amplimmune,

5,

Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,

5,

Human Genome Sciences, Inc.,

2,

Bristol Myers Squibb,

2,

Sanofi-Aventis Pharmaceutical,

2;

R. R. Edwards,
None;

B. Lu,
None;

C. C. Liu,
None;

Y. Lo,
None;

A. Wohlfahrt,
None;

N. Kim,
None;

D. J. Clauw,
None;

D. H. Solomon,

Pfizer Inc,

2,

Amgen,

2,

Lilly,

2,

Corrona,

2,

UpToDate,

7.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-effect-of-milnacipran-on-pain-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-with-widespread-pain-a-randomized-blinded-crossover-trial/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology