ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 18

The Effect of Clinically Significant Antiphospholipid Antibody Positivity on Organ Damage in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Mara Taraborelli1, Laura Leuenberger2, Wei Zhang3, Angela Tincani1, Jane Salmon2 and Doruk Erkan2, 1Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Spedali Civili and University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy, 2Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 3Healthcare Research Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Antiphospholipid antibodies and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Antiphospholipid Syndrome

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: The effect of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) on organ damage in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) patients remains unclear as there are limited number of studies with contrasting conclusions. The aim of this study was to assess the relative contribution of aPL to organ damage in SLE patients.

Methods: SLE patients (based on American College of Rheumatology [ACR] Classification Criteria) with less than 10 years of disease duration at registry entry were identified from an SLE registry. Clinical information retrieved included: demographics, disease duration, organ damage assessed by the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/ACR Damage Index (SDI), and aPL profile. A “clinically significant” aPL profile was defined as: positive lupus anticoagulant test, anticardiolipin antibody IgG/M/A ≥ 40U, and/or anti-β2Glycoprotein-I IgG/M/A ≥ 40U on two or more occasions, at least 12 weeks apart, within ± 1 year of registry entry. The outcome variable was any increase of SDI at 5 years of follow-up (time 0 was defined as registry entry). For univariate analysis the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with and without a SDI increase at 5 years were compared (Chi square or Fisher’s exact test for categorical data, Student t test or Mann-Whitney for continuous data as appropriate). The Generalized Estimated Equations (GEE) model was used as multivariate analysis to detect significant factors for increased SDI at 5 years.

Results: Of 394 patients with less than 10 years of disease duration, 112 (28%) had at least 5 years of prospective follow-up and a complete aPL profile (44% Caucasian, 19% African-American, 15% Asian, and 89% female). Mean age at diagnosis was 32 years (±13) and mean age at registry entry was 35 years (±13) with mean disease duration of 3 years (±2). Twenty-one (19%) patients had clinically significant aPL profile (isolated IgA positivity only in 5 patients, 4%). Damage was present (SDI ≥ 1) in 18/112 (16%) of patients with a mean SDI of 1.9 (±1.7) at the registry entry, and in 27/112 (24%) at 5 years follow-up with a mean of 2.4 (±2.0). An increase of SDI (range: 1-5 points) after 5 years of follow-up was observed in 16/112 (14%) of patients. On a univariate analysis, no significant associations were found between any increase of SDI at 5 years and aPL profile, race, gender, age at diagnosis, and disease duration. The GEE model confirmed the lack of an association between the aPL profile and organ damage; African-American (Odds Ratio, [OR]: 7.58, 95% Confidence Interval, [CI]: 1.54-37.27, p: 0.013) and Asian (OR: 8.1, 95% CI: 1.49-44.16, p: 0.016) patients had significantly higher risk of increased SDI at 5 years.

Conclusion: Our preliminary data demonstrate that: a) approximately 15% of SLE patients have new organ damage in 5 years; b) one-fifth of SLE patients have clinically significant aPL profiles; and c) there is no association between organ damage and clinically significant aPL-profile.


Disclosure:

M. Taraborelli,
None;

L. Leuenberger,
None;

W. Zhang,
None;

A. Tincani,
None;

J. Salmon,
None;

D. Erkan,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-effect-of-clinically-significant-antiphospholipid-antibody-positivity-on-organ-damage-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology