ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2494

The Effect of Body Mass on DAS28 Response in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated with Abatacept

J Fransen1, L Tweehuysen2, A den Broeder3, R Postema4, E Alemao5 and F van den Hoogen6, 1Department of Rheumatolgy, Radboud UMC, Nijmegen, Netherlands, 2Sint Maartenskliniek Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands, 3Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, Netherlands, 4Bristol-Myers Squibb, Uxbridge, United Kingdom, 5Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, 6Rheumatology, Radboud UMC, Nijmegen, Netherlands

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Abatacept, body mass, Disease Activity, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and treatment

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2016

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Clinical Aspects - Poster III: Treatment – Monitoring, Outcomes, Adverse Events

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Abatacept is an effective biologic agent indicated for the treatment of RA.1 Recent studies have indicated that obesity and being overweight could reduce the effect of conventional DMARDs and of anti-TNF treatment in patients with RA. However, there are limited data on the effect of weight on the treatment response for abatacept.2,3 The aim of this study was to evaluate whether BMI is a modifier for the effect of abatacept measured by DAS28 (CRP) over the first 6 months of treatment in patients with RA.

Methods: Patients with RA from Radboud UMC and the Maartenskliniek were consecutively included if they were treated for ≥5 months with abatacept. Length and weight to calculate BMI had been assessed before treatment start. DAS28 (CRP) was prospectively assessed at baseline and 6 months. Concomitant treatment and treatment history were assessed at treatment start, and closest values for RF and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) positivity obtained before baseline were used. BMI was classified as normal (BMI ≤25 kg/m2) or overweight (BMI >25 kg/m2). The relationship between BMI and response according to DAS28 (CRP) was analyzed using multivariate linear regression to control for confounding baseline covariates.

Results: A total of 113 patients were included in this analysis: 81% were female, mean (SD) age was 59 (13) years and median (P25–P75) disease duration was 13 (9–20) years. All patients had previously used other biologics, including anti-TNF. Conventional DMARDs were used as concomitant therapy in 58% of patients, most often MTX (32%); 69% of patients used IV abatacept. There were some baseline differences (p<0.10) between normal weight (39%) and overweight (61%) patients. Overweight patients were on average older (mean [SD] 60 [13] vs 56 [14] years), the proportion of males was higher (26 vs 7%), RF (75 vs 57%) and anti-CCP (77 vs 61%) positivity occurred more often, and SC abatacept was more frequently used (38 vs 21%), while they used more (median [P25–P75]) previous biologics (4 [3–4] vs 3 [2–4]). The mean (SD) baseline DAS28 (CRP) was 4.2 (1.0) in normal weight and 4.2 (1.2) in overweight patients (p=0.81). The mean (SD) change from baseline in DAS28 (CRP) over 6 months was –0.51 (1.4) in normal weight and –0.70 (1.8) in overweight patients (p=0.55). The difference of –0.19 in change of DAS28 (CRP) was reduced to –0.10 (p=0.71) after correcting for age, sex and baseline DAS28 (CRP), and further attenuated to –0.026 (p=0.92) if also corrected for anti-CCP positivity and number of previous biologic agents. Remission percentages (DAS28 <2.6) at 6 months were 23% in normal weight patients and 26% in overweight patients with an odds ratio (95% CI) of 1.2 (0.5, 2.9), which became 1.1 (0.4, 2.8) after correction for the same confounders.

Conclusion: In patients with RA, BMI was not a modifier of the effect of abatacept on DAS28 (CRP) at 6 months after treatment start. After controlling for confounders, the reduction in DAS28 (CRP) was the same for normal weight (BMI ≤25 kg/m2) and overweight (BMI >25 kg/m2) patients.

1.    Maxwell L, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;7:CD007277.

2.    Gremese E, et al. Arthritis Care Res 2013;65:94–100.

3.     Sandberg M, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2014;73:2029–33.


Disclosure: J. Fransen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2; L. Tweehuysen, None; A. den Broeder, None; R. Postema, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 3; E. Alemao, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 1,Bristol-Myers Squibb, 3; F. van den Hoogen, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Fransen J, Tweehuysen L, den Broeder A, Postema R, Alemao E, van den Hoogen F. The Effect of Body Mass on DAS28 Response in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated with Abatacept [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-effect-of-body-mass-on-das28-response-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-treated-with-abatacept/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-effect-of-body-mass-on-das28-response-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-treated-with-abatacept/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology