ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2438

The Effect of a Systematic, Personalized Computer Workstation Redesign On Musculoskeletal Symptoms

Nancy A. Baker1 and Krissy Moehling2, 1Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 2Department of Family Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: musculoskeletal disorders

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Programs and Literacy in Patients with Rheumatologic Diseases

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ARHP)

Background/Purpose:

Musculoskeletal symptoms (MSS), such as pain, numbness or cold, are common and distressing occurrences during computer use.  One commonly used method to reduce MSS is workstation redesign which aims to “fit the workstation to the worker” and thereby reduce awkward postures.  However, recent systematic reviews have reported that this method may not be effective [1].  This pilot study tested if a systematic method of workstation redesign which focused on 19 areas where mismatch could occur combined with active involvement of the worker in the development of the workstation redesign intervention plan (personalized ergonomics) would reduce or eliminate MSS one month after intervention.   

Methods:

This was a single group pretest/posttest study that examined 26 computer operators with self-reported computer related MSS of at least 2 in one body area (neck/shoulder, arm/wrist, hand) on a scale of 0 to 10 (with 0 being no pain and 10 the worst possible).  Workers completed an MSS survey, as well as a self-assessment of their workstation set-up, the Computer Ergonomic Survey (CES), and were photographed in their computer workstations.  An expert in workstation redesign used the results of the CES and photographs to identify in which of the 19 areas mismatch occurred.  The expert and the computer operator then developed an intervention plan to rectify these mismatches.  Workers implemented this plan over a one month period.  Workers then completed the MSS survey again.  They also rated their satisfaction with the workstation redesign process.

Results:

 The 26 computer operators mean age was 46.4 (±10.5).  They were primarily female (92%) and used a computer, on average, 6.0 (±1.2) hours per day.  There were significant reductions in MSS for all body areas on both the left and right sides.  Reductions in MSS achieved clinically important levels of at least 1 point for the neck/shoulder (left -1.23; right – 1.08), and right hand (1.01).  Many subjects reported complete elimination of MSS at follow-up:  neck/shoulder – left 35%, right 31%; arm/wrist – left 27%, right 46%; hand – left 27%, right 35%.  This change was significant for the left arm/wrist and both hands.  The changes reported to have the greatest effect on MSS were: adjusting the chair height to ensure that the feet were well supported (29%), adjusting the monitor height to reduce head tilt (18%), and adjusting the arm support height to support the arm during computer use (18%).  Ninety-five percent of subjects reported that they were satisfied with the recommended changes, and 100% reported that they found the process to be helpful and they felt empowered to be able to continue to adjust their workstation to continue reducing MSS.

Conclusion:

This study suggests that a systematic method of computer workstation redesign combined with worker involvement lead to significant improvements in computer-related MSS. 

References

1.            Kennedy CA, Amick BC, Dennerlein JT, et al. Systematic review of the role of occupational health and safety interventions in the prevention of upper extremity musculoskeletal symptoms, signs, disorders, injuries, claims and lost time. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 2010;20:127-62.


Disclosure:

N. A. Baker,
None;

K. Moehling,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-effect-of-a-systematic-personalized-computer-workstation-redesign-on-musculoskeletal-symptoms/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology