ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1245

The Differential Effect Of Smoking On Bone Mineral Density At The Lumbar Spine and Neck Of Femur In Each Gender: An Observational Study

William Hedges1, Alexander Oldroyd2 and Marwan Bukhari3, 1Foundation Programme, Royal Lancaster Infirmary, University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust, Lancaster, United Kingdom, 2Lancaster Medical School, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom, 3Department of Rheumatology, Royal Lancaster Infirmary, Lancaster, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), osteoporosis and tobacco use

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Disease: Clinical Aspects and Pathogenesis

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:

Current smoking is a known risk factor for loss of bone mineral density (BMD), and is part of the FRAX ™ 10-year fracture risk stratification tool developed by the World Health Organisation (1).

Reduction in BMD due to smoking seems to be more in men than women, but far less data exists looking at the effects of smoking on BMD in males. The site of maximal bone loss has not been clearly identified, varying between the hip and lumbar spine in different studies in a recent review of three meta-analyses (2). There could also be a potentially confounder in abdominal aortic calcification due to atherosclerosis falsely increasing the lumbar spine BMD (3).  This study aimed to establish the anatomical area of maximal BMD reduction due to smoking and to examine the differential impact in each gender.

Methods:

Data was analysed from male and female patients having dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) assessment between 2004 and 2011. Patients were categorised as never-smoked, current smokers, and previous smokers. Student’s t-test was performed to identify whether differences existed between smokers and non-smokers by gender. Logistic models, adjusting for age and body mass index (BMI) were then fitted examining the odds of a low bone density in both sites by gender. Finally the odds of being diagnosed as having osteoporosis (OP) (T score <-.25 at either spine or hip) was ascertained using logistic regression.

Results:

25,904 patients were included in the study, of which 3,136 were ex-smokers and 2,224 were current smokers.  This included 3901 males (15%). Mean age at scan in the whole cohort was 62.6 years (SD12.6). Current smokers were more likely to be male 398/1826 vs 3503/20169 (17.9% vs 14.8% P <0.001).  Using Student’s t-test, the BMD in women was not significantly different in the lumber spine (1.06g/cm2 vs 1.05 g/cm2 p=NS) but was significantly reduced in the hip (0.84 vs 0.85 P =0.004). In men, despite the lower numbers both spine and hip BMD were significantly lower (1.08 vs 1.13 p <0.001 and 0.88 vs 0.90 p=0.02). In females, after adjustment for age at scan and BMI the odds of a low BMD in the lumbar spine were higher than the odds in the femoral neck when adjusted for age and BMI (0.54 95%CI 0.41, 0.73 vs 0.38 95%CI 0.24, 0.60 respectively) indicating more loss in the femoral neck. In men the effect was also greater in the femoral neck (OR 0.45 95%CI 0.25, 0.81 in the lumbar spine vs 0.25 95%CI 0.10 0.66 in the femoral neck). The odds of OP in female smokers was 2.13 (95%CI 1.93,2.35) and in male smokers it was 3.17 (95%CI 2.56,3.92).

Conclusion:

Smoking causes significant BMD loss at both the spine and the hip but the effect appears to be more pronounced in male smokers. Abdominal aortic calcification appears to have a minor impact on assessing BMD in the lumbar spine. 

1.   http://www.shef.ac.uk/FRAX/index.aspx

2.  Wong P.K.K. et al “The effects of smoking on bone health.” Clinical Science. 2007; 113: 233-241

3.  Zhu D.X. et al “Mechanisms and clinical consequences of vascular calcification.” Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2012; 3(95): 1-12


Disclosure:

W. Hedges,
None;

A. Oldroyd,
None;

M. Bukhari,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-differential-effect-of-smoking-on-bone-mineral-density-at-the-lumbar-spine-and-neck-of-femur-in-each-gender-an-observational-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology