ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: L15

The Diagnostic Accuracy of PET/CT Scan of the Head, Neck and Thorax Compared with Temporal Artery Biopsy in Patients Newly Suspected of Having GCA

Anthony Sammel1, Edward Hsiao2, Geoffrey Schembri3, Katherine Nguyen4, Janice Brewer4, Leslie Schrieber5, Beatrice Janssen4, Peter Youssef6, Clare Fraser7, Elizabeth Bailey8, Dale Bailey8, Paul Roach8 and Rodger Laurent4, 1Rheumatology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Sydney, Australia, 2Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Australia, 3Nuclear Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Australia, 4Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Sydney, Australia, 5Northern Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, 6Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Sydney, Australia, 7Save Sight Institute, Sydney, Australia, 8Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: October 4, 2018

Keywords: Diagnostic imaging, giant cell arteritis and positron emission tomography (PET), Late-Breaking 2018

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018

Title: 5T113 Abstracts: Late-Breaking Abstract Session

Session Type: ACR Late-breaking Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:00PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose: The diagnostic accuracy of PET/CT against temporal artery biopsy (TAB) in patients suspected of having GCA has not been well studied. PET/CT has traditionally been used to image the aorta and primary branches, but newer generation scanners can also detect inflammation in the smaller temporal (TA), occipital (OA), maxillary (MA) and vertebral arteries (VA). We assessed the accuracy of a newer generation PET/CT time-of-flight scanner for GCA.

Methods: 64 newly suspected GCA patients were enrolled over 20 months. All underwent PET/CT from the vertex to diaphragm within 72 hours of starting corticosteroids and before TAB. Two PET experienced nuclear medicine physicians blinded to clinical and biopsy data independently reported scans as globally positive or negative for GCA. They also rated the grade that tracer (FDG) uptake exceeded background blood pool for 18 artery segments and the maximum grade per patient (0 = none, 1 = minimal/equivocal, 2 = moderate, 3 = very marked). Discordant results were resolved by consensus. The clinical diagnosis was made at the six-month mark by consensus between the PET/CT blinded treating clinician and blinded external reviewers.

Results: 58/64 (91%) patients underwent TAB and 12/58 (21%) biopsies were positive for GCA. 21/64 (33%) had a clinical diagnosis of GCA and 42 (66%) met the 1990 ACR criteria for GCA. Compared with TAB, global GCA assessment by PET/CT had sensitivity (Sn) 92%, specificity (Sp) 85%, positive predictive value (PPV) 61% and negative predictive value (NPV) 98%. Interobserver reliability was good (k = 0.65). Compared with clinical diagnosis, PET/CT had Sn 71% and Sp 91%. 2/7 PET/CT ‘false positive’ cases had GCA consistent disease flares when corticosteroids were weaned. Defining an uptake grade cut-off 1+ in any vessel as a positive scan gave Sn 100% and Sp 46% against TAB while a cut-off 2+ gave Sn 83% and Sp 83%. Four (33%) TAB positive patients had grade 2+ uptake localized to the TA, OA, MA or VA arteries and may have been missed on older generation scans.

Conclusion: This PET/CT protocol had good diagnostic accuracy. The high NPV of 98% indicates that it could be used as a first-line test to rule out GCA.


Disclosure: A. Sammel, Arthritis Australia, 2; E. Hsiao, None; G. Schembri, None; K. Nguyen, None; J. Brewer, None; L. Schrieber, None; B. Janssen, None; P. Youssef, None; C. Fraser, None; E. Bailey, None; D. Bailey, None; P. Roach, None; R. Laurent, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Sammel A, Hsiao E, Schembri G, Nguyen K, Brewer J, Schrieber L, Janssen B, Youssef P, Fraser C, Bailey E, Bailey D, Roach P, Laurent R. The Diagnostic Accuracy of PET/CT Scan of the Head, Neck and Thorax Compared with Temporal Artery Biopsy in Patients Newly Suspected of Having GCA [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-diagnostic-accuracy-of-pet-ct-scan-of-the-head-neck-and-thorax-compared-with-temporal-artery-biopsy-in-patients-newly-suspected-of-having-gca/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-diagnostic-accuracy-of-pet-ct-scan-of-the-head-neck-and-thorax-compared-with-temporal-artery-biopsy-in-patients-newly-suspected-of-having-gca/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology