ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1406

The Cost of Management of Adult Active Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in the UK

Munther A. Khamashta1, Christina Donatti2, Ian N. Bruce3, Caroline Gordon4, David A. Isenberg5 and Ateka-Barrutia Oier6, 1Lupus Research Unit, The Rayne Institute, St Thomas Hospital, Kings College London School of Medicine, London, United Kingdom, 2Health Economics and Outcomes Research, IMS Health, United Kingdom, 3Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Arthritis Research UK Epidemiology Unit and NIHR Manchester Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom, 4Rheumatology Research Group (East Wing), School of Immunity and Infection, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom, 5Centre for Rheumatology Research, Rayne Building, 4th Floor, Centre for Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University College London, London, United Kingdom, 6Lupus Research Unit, The Rayne Institute, Kings College London School of Medicine, London, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Multicenter study, severity and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Clinical Aspects

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:  Several international studies have shown that systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has a considerable financial burden on patients and the health-care economy. Little recent information is available in most European countries about the cost of SLE care (treatment strategies, healthcare pathways, medical resource utilization), especially for patients with moderate to severe disease to make valid comparison with other countries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the annual direct medical costs of the management of adult SLE with active disease in the UK.

Methods:  A multi-centre retrospective chart review involving four specialist lupus centres in the UK recruited 86 SLE patients: 38 severe and 48 non severe patients. At inclusion, patients had to have: 1) at least one change (increase in dose and/or new treatment) in treatment related to current SLE activity, and /or a new manifestations and/or worsening of clinical symptoms of SLE; or, 2) presence of at least one biomarker of SLE activity and concurrently, the presence of at least one clinical and/or hematological feature of SLE. Two-year direct costs were obtained by summarizing all the health resource costs related to laboratory and imaging tests, medical treatment, visits to doctors, day hospitalization, day surgery, emergency room visits, inpatient stays and rehabilitation stays.

Results:  Of the patients studied, 68 (94.4%) were female. The mean age was 45.5 (±13.9) years and the mean duration of SLE was 11.9 (±8.3) years. At baseline, 48/86 (55.8%) of patients had relapsing-remitting SLE and 29/86 (33.7%) had chronically active SLE; 73/86 (84.9%) of patients received corticosteroids, 63/86 (73.3%) antimalarials, 48/86 (55.8%) immunosuppressants and 17/86 (19.8%) NSAIDS. No biological drugs were prescribed at inclusion. The mean (SD) SELENA-SLEDAI score was 7.7 (5.7), and was statistically significantly greater in severe patients (9.6 vs 6.1, p=0.004). Organ damage was present in 34/86 (39.5%) of patients. Anti-dsDNA antibodies were tested in 83/86 (96.5%) at baseline; of which 53/83 (63.9%) were positive. 

The median annual direct medical cost of management of adult SLE patients with active autoantibody positive disease on medication for SLE was £2855.87 (US$4389.02) (mean [SD]: £3230.65 [£2333.21] (US$4,964.98 [US$3585.77]). The minimum and maximum costs (min: £389.06 (US$597.92), max: £9701.52 (US$14909.66) respectively) showed the wide range of costs, associated with a wide spectrum of disease activity and complications needing intervention in these lupus patients. The mean annual direct medical cost was 2.2 times higher in severe than in non-severe SLE patients (p<0.001).

Conclusion:  The trend in terms of direct costs for treating active SLE patients and the marked gradient associated with increasing disease severity are consistent with Sutcliffe et al (2001), which calculated direct costs at £2613 and higher disease activity was associated with increased costs. There are very few published studies attempting to calculate the direct costs of SLE and this study provides current and reliable source of cost data for active SLE patients in the UK and comparable healthcare systems.


Disclosure:

M. A. Khamashta,
None;

C. Donatti,
None;

I. N. Bruce,
None;

C. Gordon,
None;

D. A. Isenberg,
None;

A. B. Oier,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-cost-of-management-of-adult-active-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-in-the-uk/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology