ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2656

The Burden of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Physician’s and Patient’s Perspectives

Chiara Tani1, Maria Francisca Moraes-Fontes2, Ana Carolina Araújo2, Linda Carli3, Manuel Pereira Gonçalves4, Francesca Querci5, Alexandra Mendes6, Viola Signorini7, Sabrina Vagnani5, Rosaria Talarico8, Céu Mateus9, Stefano Bombardieri10, Nuno Riso2 and Marta Mosca11, 1Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Rheumatology Unit, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy, 2Serviço de Medicina 2, Hospital de Curry Cabral, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal, 3GenOMeC PhD, University of Siena, Siena, Italy, 4Mental Health Unit, Universidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL), Portugal, Lisboa, Portugal, 5Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Rheumatology Unit, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy, 6Clinical Psychology Unit, CHLC, Portugal, Lisboa, Portugal, 7Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy, 8Rheumatology Unit, Pisa, Italy, 9Health Economy, National School of Public Health (UNL), Portugal, Lisboa, Portugal, 10Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy, 11Rheumatology Unit, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: neuropsychiatric disorders, questionnaires and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus - Clinical Aspects and Treatment: Epidemiology, Women's Health, Cardiovascular and CNS

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) are observed in SLE with a variable prevalence depending on patient selection and assessment methods. In 2010, a 27-item questionnaire was developed to identify NPS in SLE (1); in the present study we aim to compare the capability to detect NPS by means of this questionnaire and routine clinical assessment in SLE.

Methods: The questionnaire was administered to consecutive SLE patients from two European Countries as a physicians’ administered tool in one cohort (PhQ) and  a self-administered questionnaire in the other (PaQ). On the same day the routine clinical assessment was performed by a physician expert in SLE management blinded to the questionnaire result. The concordance level of NP symptoms as reported by questionnaires and clinical evaluation were calculated. The questionnaire was considered positive in presence of at least one symptom recorded.

Results:

Overall, 137 patients were enrolled; the PhQ was administered to 70 patients (96% female, mean age at enrolment 42.3±12 years, disease duration 12.5±8.6 years) while the PaQ to 67 patients (92% female, mean age at enrolment 47±13 years, disease duration 14±9 years). Previous NP involvement was present in 25% of patients in PhQ cohort  and in 21% in PaQ cohort. According to the clinical records and irrespectively from their attribution, NPS were reported in 23 patients (32%) in the PhQ cohort, and in 23 (34.3%) in the PaQ cohort; overall, there were neurologic symptoms in 15% and psychiatric symptoms in 14% of cases. According to questionnaires, at least one NPS was captured in 61 patients (87%) of the PhQ cohort and 62 (92%) in PaQ cohort. In the PhQ cohort, among the 61 patients with at least one symptom as captured by the questionnaire PhQ, 20 (32.7%) have also NPS recorded in the clinical chart; in all the 8 patients with negative questionnaire, no NPS were recorded in the clinical chart (agreement p=0.057). Similarly,  among the 62 patients with positive PaQ, 20 (29.8%) have also NPS recorded in the clinical chart (agreement p=0.07).Cognitive impairment, depression and anxiety were the most overlooked symptoms in the clinical charts.

Conclusion: These data demonstrated that some NPS can be overlooked by the physician during routine clinical assessment. Although the clinical significance of these observations are under evaluation, this screening questionnaire can be a useful aid, for identifying patients with NPS requiring further evaluation.

  1. Mosca M, et al. The development of a simple questionnaire to screen patients with SLE for the presence of neuropsychiatric symptoms in routine clinical practice. Lupus. 2011 Apr;20(5):485-92.

Disclosure:

C. Tani,
None;

M. F. Moraes-Fontes,
None;

A. C. Araújo,
None;

L. Carli,
None;

M. Pereira Gonçalves,
None;

F. Querci,
None;

A. Mendes,
None;

V. Signorini,
None;

S. Vagnani,
None;

R. Talarico,
None;

C. Mateus,
None;

S. Bombardieri,
None;

N. Riso,
None;

M. Mosca,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-burden-of-neuropsychiatric-symptoms-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-physicians-and-patients-perspectives/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology