ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 205

Temporal Trends In The Prescribing Of Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs For Rheumatoid Arthritis and The Impact Of Guidelines

Gemma L Wallace1, C. J. Edwards2, Nigel K. Arden3, Daniel Prieto-Alhambra4 and Andrew Judge5, 1NDORMS, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, 2Rheumatology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom, 3NDORMS; MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, Oxford NIHR Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, 4Internal Medicine; Primary Care; NDORMS Dept; MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, URFOA-IMIM, Parc de Salut Mar; Idiap Jordi Gol; University of Oxford; University of Southampton, Barcelona, Spain, 5Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, guidelines and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Health Services Research, Quality Measures and Quality of Care-Rheumatoid Arthritis

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

 

Background/Purpose: Disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are standard initial treatments for rheumatoid arthritis (RA).  Many RA treatment guidelines have been published including from the American College of Rheumatology (ACR), European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) and British Society for Rheumatology (BSR).  However, there is little evidence to demonstrate that guidelines alter prescribing practice.  BSR guidelines for treatment of RA were published in 2006 and recommended initiation of DMARDs in the first 90 days after RA diagnosis. We aimed to test whether publication of these guidelines changed clinical practice.

Methods: We used the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, consisting of primary care records & prescriptions, secondary care referral details, procedures and diagnoses, for >10 million patients from a representative sample of primary care practices in the UK. DMARDs are usually initiated in the UK by a rheumatologist, with ongoing DMARD prescribing usually performed by primary care physicians with supervision by a rheumatologist. Incident diagnoses of RA in persons aged ≥18 years between 1995-2010 were identified. For each calendar year and quarter, the proportion of patients receiving any DMARD prescription within 90 days and 1 year of diagnosis was ascertained. An interrupted time-series regression model was used to assess whether trends in the proportion of patients receiving DMARDs within 90 days and 1 year changed following publication of the 2006 BSR Guidelines.

Results: Between 1995 and 2010, 25,963 incident cases of RA were identified, 69% female, average age of diagnosis 59 years. There was a progressive increase in the proportion of patients prescribed a DMARD by a primary care physician within 90 days from 16.6% in 1995 to 23.5% in 2005. The proportion receiving DMARD/s within 90 days increased more rapidly following publication of the BSR guidelines (Figure 1) to 27.9% by end 2006 and 36.0% in 2010 (p=0.01). A similar pattern was observed for the proportion of patients receiving DMARD/s within 365 days of diagnosis (p=0.002).

Conclusion: The proportion of patients prescribed a DMARD in primary care in this study is lower than generally accepted estimates. This may reflect reality for patients with RA outside of specialist centres although secondary care prescribing is not captured within this database. Nevertheless, prescriptions that are captured should be representative of overall trends in prescriptions within the UK and suggests that guidelines published by a national body can improve the proportion of patients receiving DMARD treatment in the first year after diagnosis of RA.


Disclosure:

G. L. Wallace,
None;

C. J. Edwards,

Roche Pharmaceuticals,

2,

UCB,

2,

Abbott Immunology Pharmaceuticals,

2,

Pfizer Inc,

2,

GlaxoSmithKline,

2;

N. K. Arden,

Merck Pharmaceuticals,

5,

Roche Pharmaceuticals,

5,

Smith & Nephew, Inc.,

5,

Q-Med,

5,

NiCox, S.A.,

5,

Flexion,

5,

Bioberica,

5;

D. Prieto-Alhambra,

Bioiberica,

2,

Amgen,

2;

A. Judge,

Servier,

2,

Anthera,

5,

Roche Pharmaceuticals,

2.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/temporal-trends-in-the-prescribing-of-disease-modifying-anti-rheumatic-drugs-for-rheumatoid-arthritis-and-the-impact-of-guidelines/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology