ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1691

Systemic Sclerosis Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension Have a Lower Change in End Tidal Carbon Dioxide Following Three Minutes of Step Exercise Than Systemic Sclerosis Patients without Pulmonary Hypertension: A Cross-Sectional Study

Elana J. Bernstein1, Jessica K. Gordon2, Robert F. Spiera2, Wei-Ti Huang3, Evelyn M. Horn4 and Lisa A. Mandl2, 1Rheumatology, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, NY, 2Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 3Biostatistics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 4Cardiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Diagnostic Tests, pulmonary complications, scleroderma and systemic sclerosis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Systemic Sclerosis, Fibrosing Syndromes and Raynaud's - Clinical Aspects and Therapeutics: Systemic Sclerosis, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Aspects

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a leading cause of death in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc).  Transthoracic echocardiogram and pulmonary function testing are standard noninvasive screening methods for PH.  However, both are limited in their ability to distinguish between SSc patients with and without PH.  The gold standard diagnostic test for PH is right heart catheterization (RHC), which although accurate, is expensive, invasive, and has associated risks.  Finding an accurate, noninvasive technique to screen for PH in the SSc population is an important unmet need.

The submaximal heart and pulmonary evaluation (step test) is a standardized, noninvasive, submaximal stress test that consists of a 5.5 inch high step that patients step up and down on for 3 minutes.  During the test, end tidal carbon dioxide, which is positively correlated with cardiac output and pulmonary blood flow and inversely correlated with the minute ventilation to carbon dioxide production ratio (VE/VCO2) and reflects the severity of PH, is monitored.  Our primary aim was to determine whether SSc patients with PH would have a lower change in end tidal carbon dioxide (DPETCO2) from rest to end-exercise on the step test than SSc patients without PH.  Our secondary aim was to determine whether SSc patients with PH would have a higher VE/VCO2 than those without PH. We also examined differences in validated self-report questionnaires and biomarkers between SSc patients with and without PH.  We hypothesized that SSc patients with PH would have a lower DPETCO2 and higher VE/VCO2 than SSc patients without PH.     

Methods: This is a cross-sectional study of 27 patients with limited or diffuse cutaneous SSc who underwent an RHC within 24 months of study entry.  All patients were administered the step test between May 2012 and August 2013.  DPETCO2 and VE/VCO2 were compared between patients with and without PH, defined as a mean pulmonary artery pressure ≥ 25 mmHg on RHC.  Differences in self-report data and biomarkers were also compared between groups. Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal-Wallis, chi square, and Fisher exact tests, as appropriate.

Results: See Table 1 for patient characteristics. SSc patients with PH had a statistically significantly lower median DPETCO2 than SSc patients without PH (-2.1 [-5.1 – +0.7] vs. 1.2 [-0.7 – +5.4], p=0.035) and a statistically significantly higher median VE/VCO2 (53.4 [39-64.1] vs. 36.4 [31.9-41.1], p=0.035) than SSc patients without PH.  There were no statistically significant differences in self-report data or biomarkers between groups (Table 1).    

Conclusion: DPETCO2 and  VE/VCO2 as measured by the step test are statistically significantly different between SSc patients with and without PH.  Neither traditional self-report outcome measures nor biomarkers differed between groups.  Further prospective studies are needed to evaluate the step test as a screening tool for PH in the SSc population. 

 

Table 1: Patient Characteristics, Self-Report Questionnaire Scores, and Biomarker Levels

Patient Characteristics

PH (N = 18)

No PH (N = 9)

p-value

Age – yr

61.9 (52.9-69.2)

65.7 (56.4-70.3)

0.64

Female sex

13 (72%)

5 (56%)

0.39

White race

13 (72%)

7 (78%)

0.76

Limited cutaneous SSc

13 (72%)

6 (67%)

0.77

Disease duration – yr

17.5 (6.4-26.1)

11.5 (4.02-19.4)

0.22

Time between RHC and step test – months

9.9 (7.2-16.5)

12.5 (4.6-22.5)

0.64

Anti-centromere antibody positive

6/17 (35%)

3 (33%)

0.92

Anti-Scl-70 antibody positive

2/17 (12%)

4 (44%)

0.06

Anti-RNA polymerase III antibody positive

1/16 (6%)

0/7 (0%)

0.99

Raynaud’s phenomenon

17 (94%)

9 (100%)

0.47

Digital ulcerations

10 (56%)

6 (67%)

0.58

Renal crisis

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

 

Sclerodactyly

16 (89%)

8 (89%)

 

Interstitial lung disease

10 (56%)

5 (56%)

 

Gastroesophageal reflux disease

16 (89%)

9 (100%)

0.30

Calcinosis

7 (39%)

4 (44%)

0.78

Telangiectasias

13 (72%)

7 (78%)

0.76

Proximal lower extremity weakness

1 (6%)

0 (0%)

0.47

Arthritis

9 (50%)

5 (56%)

0.79

Tobacco use

 

 

0.41

     Never

11 (61%)

4 (44%)

 

     Former

7 (39%)

5 (56%)

 

Self-Report Questionnaires

PH (N = 18)

No PH (N = 9)

 

Cambridge Pulmonary Hypertension Outcome Review

 

 

 

Symptom Scale

8 (4-12)

6 (5-10)

0.90

     Energy Subscale

4 (2-6)

5 (2-6)

0.68

     Breathlessness Subscale

3.5 (1-4)

2 (2-4)

0.56

     Mood Subscale

1 (0-2)

0 (0-2)

0.72

Functioning Scale

8.5 (6-15)

7 (5-11)

0.74

Quality of Life Scale

5 (2-8)

5 (2-7)

0.80

Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire

 

 

 

HAQ-DI component

0.88 (0.25-1.50)

0.75 (0.13-1.25)

0.74

Raynaud’s phenomenon VAS

15 (0-40)

10 (2-35)

0.91

Digital tip ulceration VAS

0.5 (0-8)

1 (0-14)

0.67

Pulmonary symptom VAS

39.5 (10-52)

15 (11-50)

0.94

Gastrointestinal symptom VAS

12.5 (0-50)

12 (10-30)

0.80

Overall disease severity VAS

50 (21-68)

38 (27-56)

0.88

Borg Dyspnea Index

3 (1-4)

3 (2-4)

 

Biomarkers                            

PH (N = 18)

No PH (N = 9)

 

Vascular endothelial growth factor – pg/mL

346.4 (260.1-427.2)

N = 17

265.2 (228.9-468.2)

0.55

Hypoxia-inducible factor 1α – units

23.62 (22.98-23.80)

N = 17

23.29 (22.99-23.53)

0.40

Interleukin-6 – pg/mL

4.46 (3.72-10.54)

N = 17

5.45 (3.19-6.3)

0.77

N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide – fmol/mL

1152.2 (503.7-2207.6)

N = 17

566.6 (296.2-902.3)

0.08

Data presented as mean (SD), median (IQR), and frequency (percentage)

HAQ-DI = Health Assessment Questionnaire – Disability Index; VAS = Visual Analogue Scale

 


Disclosure:

E. J. Bernstein,
None;

J. K. Gordon,
None;

R. F. Spiera,

roche-genetech,

2;

W. T. Huang,
None;

E. M. Horn,
None;

L. A. Mandl,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/systemic-sclerosis-patients-with-pulmonary-hypertension-have-a-lower-change-in-end-tidal-carbon-dioxide-following-three-minutes-of-step-exercise-than-systemic-sclerosis-patients-without-pulmonary-hype/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology