ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2359

Systemic Lupus Erythematous Outcome Concerns: Identifying Pain As the Major Discrepancy between Rheumatologists and Patients

Isabela Bertoglio1, Glaucia Abrahão1, Eloisa Bonfa2 and Michelle Lopes3, 1Rheumatology, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP, São Paulo, Brazil, 2Rheumatology Division, Hospital das Clinicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, 3Rheumatology Division, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: outcomes, patient outcomes, patient participation and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018

Title: Patient Outcomes, Preferences, and Attitudes Poster II: Patient Perspectives

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Now-a-days there is a growing trend of switching to a more patient-centered healthcare system, with a widespread use of patient-reported outcomes (PROs). However, most of PROs questionnaires are designed by physicians/specialists and patients are underrepresented in this development. This research’s purpose was to identify and compare major outcomes that matter for patients and rheumatologist aiming to better address patient´s needs. Methods: 75 consecutive SLE patients (SLICC criteria, 2012) and 53 Rheumatologists from a tertiary center were invited to answer an open questionnaire inquiring their 5 major concerns regarding lupus outcomes. Among the 53 Rheumatologists there were 5 SLE specialists and 20 rheumatology fellows.  The top 5 concerns of each group were assessed and frequencies where compared with appropriate tests. The agreement rate was calculated considering the sum of lowest frequency of each concern that appeared in all the analyzed groups. Results: The top 5 concerns raised by patients were: pain (47%), renal function (18%), skin lesions (16%), thrombosis (10%) and fatigue (10%). The top 5 concerns among rheumatologists were: SLEDAI (40%), SLICC-Damage Index (SDI) (22%), prednisone dose (16%), quality of life (12%) and renal function (11%). The agreement rate between all rheumatologists was 63% (all agreed that SLEDAI, SDI and prednisone dose were major concerns). Fellows pointed laboratory tests (such as anti-DNA and Complement levels) as a major concern not reported by the other rheumatologists (p=0.002). SLE specialists pointed comorbidities (such as hypertension and obesity) as main concerns not reported by the other rheumatologists (p=0.032). The agreement rate between patients and rheumatologists was 45% (renal function, skin lesions and thrombosis). The main difference between patients and rheumatologists were the pain (p=0.0001) and fatigue (p=0.023).  Fatigue was reported as an outcome concern by 10% of the patients but less than 2% of rheumatologists, however quality of life pointed by rheumatologists may address partially the fatigue concept. Regarding pain, half was related to generalized pain and the other half related solely to arthralgia and therefore the majority would not be scored by SLEDAI (that consider only arthritis as a domains).  Conclusion: We identified that there are different outcome concerns between patients and rheumatologists for lupus treatment. Pain was the most important discrepancy since it is not adequately addressed by the routine SLE indexes reported as the top 5 Rheumatologists outcome concerns. Improving physician’s awareness of patient’s outcome concerns and of comorbidities, as pointed out by the specialist, may provide a better assistance and ensure treatment adherence in this disease.

 

Figure 1. Top 5 major outcome concerns among SLE patients and Rheumatologists

Uma imagem contendo captura de tela, gráficos vetoriais Descrição gerada com muito alta confiança


Disclosure: I. Bertoglio, None; G. Abrahão, None; E. Bonfa, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, 2,Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, 2; M. Lopes, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Bertoglio I, Abrahão G, Bonfa E, Lopes M. Systemic Lupus Erythematous Outcome Concerns: Identifying Pain As the Major Discrepancy between Rheumatologists and Patients [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/systemic-lupus-erythematous-outcome-concerns-identifying-pain-as-the-major-discrepancy-between-rheumatologists-and-patients/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/systemic-lupus-erythematous-outcome-concerns-identifying-pain-as-the-major-discrepancy-between-rheumatologists-and-patients/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology