ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1161

Systematic Development of a Patient-Centered Strategy to Improve Tight Control in Daily Clinical Practice

Marieke J. de Jonge1, Sofie H.M. Manders1, Anita M.P. Huis1, Mart A.F.J. van de Laar2, Piet L.C.M. van Riel1,3 and Marlies E.J.L. Hulscher1, 1Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, Nijmegen, Netherlands, 2University of Twente, Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, Enschede, Netherlands, 3Bernhoven, Department of Rheumatology, Uden, Netherlands

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Disease Activity and patient engagement

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2016

Title: Education - ARHP Poster

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:  Patients are not aware of the important role of disease activity in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) for long term clinical outcomes. This not only prevents them from taking a more central role in the care for their own health, it also hinders rheumatologists in adhering to the tight control principle. In order to improve daily clinical practice, an improvement strategy should address patient-level barriers to tight control adherence.

Methods: The strategy was developed through a step-wise approach, in collaboration with all stakeholders and by addressing barriers to tight control on patient level. Strategies that have already proven to be successful in other chronic diseases were taken into consideration. First patient-level barriers to tight control were defined and evidence and example materials were explored. Next, a draft version was developed and improved through applying the International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) criteria. Then, the draft was further improved by consulting an expert panel, patient research partners, and rheumatology professionals several times. The layout of the strategy was developed by consulting laymen, hospital communication departments, and patients.

Results: The DAS-pass strategy consists of two components. The first component, decision supportive information for patients, includes an informational leaflet and a patient held record. The leaflet is designed to educate patients about tight control and its importance for clinical outcomes. It aims to increase patients knowledge on tight control, to empower patients to be more involved in their own disease management, and to improve patients’ medication beliefs. With the patient held record, patients can keep track of their own disease activity scores, their RA medication (changes), and on topics to be discussed with their physician. The patient held record aims to increase understanding of the tight control principle by increasing involvement and information uptake. The second component is guidance by a specialized rheumatology nurse. By discussing the decision supportive information (component 1) during an individual consult with each patient, the nurse aims to stimulate patients to communicate about their disease activity during visits, to individualize the decision supportive information to the patients’ needs, and to offer the opportunity to ask questions or ask for additional support.

Conclusion: The DAS-pass strategy is a patient centered-strategy that was developed to improve tight control in daily clinical practice. By empowering and educating patients, it aims to improve communication about tight control between patients and rheumatologists, and to enable patients to take the initiative in tight control. We consider the DAS-pass strategy promising as it was developed systematically: theory based and in cooperation with the stakeholders. Research on the evaluation of the effects of the DAS-pas strategy in a Randomized Controlled Trial is currently ongoing. Acknowledgements: The input of all stakeholders that have helped in the development of the DAS-pas strategy is very much appreciated.


Disclosure: M. J. de Jonge, None; S. H. M. Manders, None; A. M. P. Huis, None; M. A. F. J. van de Laar, None; P. L. C. M. van Riel, None; M. E. J. L. Hulscher, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

de Jonge MJ, Manders SHM, Huis AMP, van de Laar MAFJ, van Riel PLCM, Hulscher MEJL. Systematic Development of a Patient-Centered Strategy to Improve Tight Control in Daily Clinical Practice [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/systematic-development-of-a-patient-centered-strategy-to-improve-tight-control-in-daily-clinical-practice/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/systematic-development-of-a-patient-centered-strategy-to-improve-tight-control-in-daily-clinical-practice/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology