ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1664

Switch from Tocilizumab + Methotrexate to Tocilizumab Monotherapy. Maintenance of Response in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis at Low Disease Activity.

Jose L. Pablos1, Navarro Sarabia F2, Francisco J. Blanco3, Jose Andres Roman Ivorra4, Alberto Alonso5, Emilio Martin-Mola6 and Miguel Cantalejo-Moreira7, 1Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain, 2Rheumatologist Service, Hospital. Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain, 3Cartilage Biology Group. Rheumatology Division, INIBIC-Hospital Universitario A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain, 4Rheumatology, H.U. P. La Fe, Valencia, Spain, 5H Cruces, Baracaldo, Spain, 6H La Paz, Madrid, Spain, 7Rheumatology Unit, Hospital de Fuenlabrada, Fuenlabrada, Spain

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Clinical research, Clinical Response, Disease Activity, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and tocilizumab

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2015

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Tocilizumab (TCZ) represents an efficacious alternative for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with an inadequate clinical response to biological or non-biological disease-modifying anrirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Previous data support the use of TCZ in monotherapy but there are limited data on its efficacy compared to TCZ + MTX (methotrexate).

Methods:

The study was designed as a phase III, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group (1:1), multicentre clinical trial. During the first part of the study all patients with active RA and previous inadequate response to MTX were treated with combined TCZ 8 mg/Kg i.v. every 4 weeks + oral MTX for 16 weeks and then all which showed a low activity (DAS28 ≤ 3.2) were randomized (1:1) to either TCZ + MTX or TCZ + placebo with a follow-up of 28 weeks. Secondary endpoints included clinical response after 28 weeks, improvement of general status and quality of life. Safety assessment was also assessed and included adverse events, serious adverse events, and change in laboratory parameters. Sample size was calculated in 79 patients per group in order to detect a minimum disease activity score (DAS28) clinically relevant difference of 0.5 (standard deviation 1.1) with 80% power and two-sided 5% alpha level. Statistical analysis was performed with SAS v9.2, and included analysis of covariance for the primary endpoint (with week 16 DAS28 as a covariate), and descriptive parameters for secondary endpoints, with an intention to treat approach. Safety cumulative incidences were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01399697.)

Results:

The first part of the study included 263 RA patients with previous inadequate response to MTX (DAS28 5.6 ± 1.2). Of those, 165 patients showed low disease activity (LDA) at 16 weeks (DAS ≤ 3.2) and were randomized to TCZ + MTX (n=83) or TCZ + placebo (n=82). DAS28 from week 16 to week 28 did not change significantly in both groups (from 1.77 to 1.87 with TCZ + MTX, and from 1.96 to 1.98 with TCZ + placebo, ANOVA, p=0.89). Remission rates (DAS28<2.6) at week 28 were similar in both groups TCZ + MTX and TCZ monotherapy (82.3% and 75.9% respectively, p=0.33), and similar to those at week 16 in both groups (84.0% and 72.0% respectively). No statistically significant differences were observed in any of the secondary variables. The incidence of adverse events after week 16 was similar in both groups. Hypertransaminasemia was the most frequently adverse event reported in both groups (9.6% and 4.9%, respectively)

Conclusion:

Switching from TCZ + MTX to TCZ monotherapy in patients with LDA is not followed by any clinical change, either in the efficacy or the safety profiles. Therefore, the TCZ monotherapy could be an efficacious and safe alternative for those patients not suitable to receive MTX in combination.


Disclosure: J. L. Pablos, None; N. S. F, None; F. J. Blanco, None; J. A. Roman Ivorra, None; A. Alonso, None; E. Martin-Mola, None; M. Cantalejo-Moreira, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Pablos JL, F NS, Blanco FJ, Roman Ivorra JA, Alonso A, Martin-Mola E, Cantalejo-Moreira M. Switch from Tocilizumab + Methotrexate to Tocilizumab Monotherapy. Maintenance of Response in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis at Low Disease Activity. [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/switch-from-tocilizumab-methotrexate-to-tocilizumab-monotherapy-maintenance-of-response-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-at-low-disease-activity/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/switch-from-tocilizumab-methotrexate-to-tocilizumab-monotherapy-maintenance-of-response-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-at-low-disease-activity/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology