ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 179

Swimming Against the Stream- the Fishbowl Discussion Method As an Interactive Tool for Medical Conferences – Experiences from the 11. European Lupus Meeting

Johanna Mucke1, Hans-Joachim Anders2, Martin Aringer3, Dr. Gamal Chehab1, Rebecca Fischer-Betz1, Falk Hiepe4, Hannes-Martin Lorenz5, Andreas Schwarting6, Reinhard Voll7 and Matthias Schneider1, 1Policlinic for Rheumatology & Hiller Research Centre for Rheumatology, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany, 2Division of Nephrology, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany, 3Medicine III, University Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany, 4Charité University Medicine, Department of Medicine/Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology and German Rheumatism Research Centre Berlin (DRFZ), Berlin, Germany, 5Im Neuenheimer Feld 41, UNI-Klinikum Heidelberg, Medizinische Klinik,, Heidelberg, Germany, 6Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Johannes-Gutenberg, Mainz, Germany, 7Clinic for Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: educational innovation

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 21, 2018

Title: Education Poster

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: A ubiquitous hierarchy pervades all levels of medicine. The high level of recognition and respect for experts and their opinions prevents exchange between the different levels of the hierarchy. Especially at medical conferences, discussions usually take place between experts, while patients, young doctors and students listen, and active participation often does not occur. The fishbowl method is an interactive and dynamic technique with a group of discussants sitting in an inner circle that contains an additional empty chair. Members from the auditorium can, at any time, occupy the empty chair and join the discussion. It was our aim to introduce this method as an alternative to pure expert panels.

Methods: Ten discussion groups with different topics were formed in advance of the European Lupus Meeting 2018. The groups consisted of an SLE expert moderator, a SLE patient representative, a fellow in training and two international SLE experts. Each discussion lasted one hour and was protocolled on flipcharts by another fellow and a fourth SLE expert. The method was evaluated by participants and the auditorium in an online survey distributed via email after the conference among all attendees assessing feelings as active participants and opinions regarding the effectiveness of the method.

Results: A total of 169 attendees completed the online survey. 47 were members of the inner circle (8 moderators, 14 experts, 5 patient representatives, 20 fellows) and 122 were members of the audience. Only 15.5% had heard about the method before and 6.6% had participated in a fishbowl round before. 39 members of the audience participated actively, of whom the majority felt comfortable (28.7%) or even very comfortable (16.6%) with their role on the empty chair. 78.5% of all participants would recommend the method for future conferences. Levels of agreement regarding the effectiveness of the method are shown in Figure 1. Opinions did not differ between the inner circle and the audience.

Conclusion: The fishbowl discussions were overall excellently received and positively evaluated. Fishbowl provides a diverse and apparently effective method for scientific exchange. By reducing hierarchies and challenging traditions, active participation is facilitated and otherwise hesitant listeners can easily contribute to the discussion.

Figure 1


Disclosure: J. Mucke, None; H. J. Anders, None; M. Aringer, None; D. G. Chehab, None; R. Fischer-Betz, None; F. Hiepe, None; H. M. Lorenz, None; A. Schwarting, None; R. Voll, None; M. Schneider, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Mucke J, Anders HJ, Aringer M, Chehab DG, Fischer-Betz R, Hiepe F, Lorenz HM, Schwarting A, Voll R, Schneider M. Swimming Against the Stream- the Fishbowl Discussion Method As an Interactive Tool for Medical Conferences – Experiences from the 11. European Lupus Meeting [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/swimming-against-the-stream-the-fishbowl-discussion-method-as-an-interactive-tool-for-medical-conferences-experiences-from-the-11-european-lupus-meeting/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/swimming-against-the-stream-the-fishbowl-discussion-method-as-an-interactive-tool-for-medical-conferences-experiences-from-the-11-european-lupus-meeting/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology