ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 393

Surfactant Protein D as a Useful Predictor for Mortality in Myositis-associated Interstitial Lung Disease: A Dimorphic Model Based on anti-MDA5 Antibody

Shinjiro Kaieda1, Takahisa Gono 2, Kenichi Masui 3, Naoshi Nishina 4, Shinji Sato 5 and Masataka Kuwana 6, 1Department of Medicine, Division of Respirology, Neurology, and Rheumatology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan, 2Department of Allergy and Rheumatology, Nippon Medical School Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan, Tokyo, Japan, 3Department of Anaesthesiology, Show University School of Medicine, Saitama, Japan, 4Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan, 5Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tokai University School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan, 6Department of Allergy and Rheumatology, Nippon Medical School Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: myositis and interstitial lung disease

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 10, 2019

Title: Muscle Biology, Myositis & Myopathies Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session (Sunday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Surfactant protein D (SP-D) is considered a serum biomarker of various forms of interstitial lung disease (ILD). However, the usefulness of SP-D for prediction of mortality remained unknown in detail in patients with ILD associated with polymyositis/dermatomyositis (myositis-associated ILD). Thus, we aimed to examine the utility of SP-D as a predictive biomarker for mortality in patients with myositis-associated ILD using our large-scale multicentre cohort data.

Methods: We recently established a multicentre retrospective cohort of Japanese patients with myositis-associated ILD (JAMI), which involved 44 institutions across Japan. We enrolled 381 patients with incident myositis-associated ILD in the JAMI cohort based on the availability of serum SP-D at the baseline. Demographic and clinical characteristics as well as the presence of autoantibodies to melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (MDA5) and aminoacyl tRNA synthetase were measured at the time of diagnosis, and follow-up survival data were collected prospectively.

Results: Seventy-eight patients died during the median observation period of 18 months, and the majority of patients died of ILD. The mortality rate was significantly higher (P = 0.0057) in a subset of patients with SP-D < 95.4 ng/mL, the cut-off value estimated by the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), than a subset with SP-D ≥95.4 ng/mL. (P = 0.0065; Figure 1A). However, interestingly, the survival curves intersected at 78 months, suggesting a dimorphic role of the SP-D level in the survival of patients with PM/DM-associated ILD:, i.e., short-term mortality was associated with a lower SP-D level, while long-term mortality was associated with a higher SP-D level. Therefore, we divided the enrolled patients into two subsets, anti-MDA5-antibody-positive group and negative group.  In anti-MDA5 antibody-positive patients, survival rates were similar between those with SP-D levels at diagnosis < 95.4 ng/mL and ≥95.4 ng/mg (P = 0.90; Figure 1B). In contrast, in anti-MDA5 antibody-negative patients, survival rates were significantly worse in patients with SP-D levels ≥95.4 ng/mL than in those with SP-D levels < 95.4 ng/mL (P = 0.02; Figure 1C). Surprisingly, in anti-MDA5 antibody-negative patients, none of the patients with SP-D levels < 95.4 ng/mL died . In other words, all deceased patients with SP-D level < 95.4 ng/mL were positive for the anti-MDA5 antibody. We re-estimated the optimal cut-off value of SP-D for mortality in anti-MDA5 antibody-positive and anti-MDA5 antibody-negative patients individually with ROC curve analyses, resulting in optimal cut-off levels of 59.8 ng/mL in anti-MDA5 antibody-positive patients (P = 0.027;Figure2A) and 127.6 ng/mL in anti-MDA5 antibody-negative patients ( P = 0.0029;Figure2B).

Conclusion: Serum SP-D is a useful predictor for the prognosis of patients with myositis-associated ILD. We successfully demonstrated the dimorphic role of the SP-D level in the prediction of outcomes on the basis of the presence or absence of anti-MDA5 antibody.


ACR 2019 Figure 1


ACR 2019 Figure 2


Disclosure: S. Kaieda, None; T. Gono, Astellas, 8, Astellas Pharma, 8, Boehringer-ingelheim Pharma, 8, Chugai, 8, Janssen, 8, MBL, 8, MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL LABORATORIES CO., LTD, 8, Ono, 8, Ono Pharma, 8, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, 8, UCB Japan, 8; K. Masui, None; N. Nishina, None; S. Sato, MBL, 7, MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL LABORATORIES CO., LTD, 7; M. Kuwana, Abbvie, 2, 8, Actelion, 2, 8, Actelion Pharmaceuticals, 2, 8, Astellas, 2, 8, Bayer, 5, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, Boehringer-Ingelheim, 5, Chugai, 2, 5, 8, Corbus, 5, CSL Behring, 5, CSL Berling, 5, Eisai, 2, 8, Eli Lilly, 2, Janssen, 8, Japan Blood Products Organization, 8, MBL, 7, 8, Ono, 2, 8, Pfizer, 2, Reata, 5, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, 2, 8.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Kaieda S, Gono T, Masui K, Nishina N, Sato S, Kuwana M. Surfactant Protein D as a Useful Predictor for Mortality in Myositis-associated Interstitial Lung Disease: A Dimorphic Model Based on anti-MDA5 Antibody [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/surfactant-protein-d-as-a-useful-predictor-for-mortality-in-myositis-associated-interstitial-lung-disease-a-dimorphic-model-based-on-anti-mda5-antibody/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/surfactant-protein-d-as-a-useful-predictor-for-mortality-in-myositis-associated-interstitial-lung-disease-a-dimorphic-model-based-on-anti-mda5-antibody/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology