ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 166

Superior Sensitivity for Detection of Primary Antiphospholipid Syndrome By a 9-Test Panel in Patients with Deep Venous Thrombosis, Pulmonary Embolism, and Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack

Konrad Dziamski1, Katalin Banki2 and Andras Perl3, 1Rheumatology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, 2Clinical Pathology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, 3Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Antiphospholipid antibodies, antiphospholipid syndrome and laboratory tests

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 21, 2018

Title: Antiphospholipid Syndrome Poster

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) is characterized by thrombotic events mediated by antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Most patients have primary APS (PAPS), while a significant minority has SLE (Ann. Rheum. Dis. 74, 1011). Although PAPS affects 0.5% of the population (Thrombosis Res. 151, S43), it may be underdiagnosed in the absence of SLE. Thus, we evaluated aPL testing in non-SLE patients with deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (P), and stroke or transient ischemic attack (S/TIA).

Methods:

1835 patients were evaluated for PAPS at our Institution between 2010 and 2018: 513 were diagnosed with PE, 583 with DVT, and 739 with S/TIA. Lupus anticoagulants were assessed by hexagonal phase phospholipid neutralization assay (HPPNA) and diluted Russell viper venom test (dRVVT) using Stago protocols (Parsippany, NJ, USA). Platelet neutralization procedure (PNP) was performed, as earlier described (Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 79, 678). IgG and IgM antibodies to β2-glycoprotein 1 (aβ2-IgG, aβ2-IgM) and cardiolipin (aCL-IgG, aCL-IgM) were measured in house while IgA isotypes (aβ2-IgA, aCL-IgA) were tested by LabCorp (Burlington, NC). Sensitivities, specificities, positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) were assessed by 2-tailed χ2 tests using GraphPad software.

 

Results:

In patients with PE, HPPNA was the most sensitive individual test for detecting APS (from 349/513 tested, 144/349 resulted in positive HPPNA (41%). 50/513 patients were assessed with all 9 tests; 30/50 had at least one positive result (sensitivity: 60%; p<0.0001 relative to HPPNA). In patients with DVT, HPPNA was also most sensitive for detecting APS (from 485/583, 216/485 resulted in positive HPPNA (45%), p<0.01 relative to all other individual tests). 47/583 patients were assessed with all 9 tests; 36/47 had a least one positive test (sensitivity: 76.6%; p<0.0001 relative to HPPNA). In 739 patients with S/TIA, PNP was the most sensitive individual test for detecting APS (from 81/739, 26/81 resulted in positive PNP (32%). 54/739 patients were evaluated with all 9 tests; 39/54 had a least one positive test (sensitivity: 72%; p<0.0001 relative to PNP).When combining patients with DVT, PE, and S/TIA (Table 1), the complete 9-test panel yielded the greatest sensitivity for detecting APS (105/151, 69.5%) relative to the most sensitive individual test, HPPNA (382/1060, 36%; p<0.0001). The 9-test panel had similar specificity and PPV but markedly higher NPV at 46% over any individual test (p<0.0001).

Conclusion:

This study indicates that a 9-test aPL panel has superior sensitivity for detecting PAPS in patients with DVT, PE, or Stroke/TIA. However, the complete panel was only performed in 151 of 1835 patients with thrombotic events. These findings have major implications for diagnosis of PAPS patients who need lifelong anticoagulation for preventing potentially fatal thrombotic events.

 


Disclosure: K. Dziamski, None; K. Banki, None; A. Perl, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Dziamski K, Banki K, Perl A. Superior Sensitivity for Detection of Primary Antiphospholipid Syndrome By a 9-Test Panel in Patients with Deep Venous Thrombosis, Pulmonary Embolism, and Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/superior-sensitivity-for-detection-of-primary-antiphospholipid-syndrome-by-a-9-test-panel-in-patients-with-deep-venous-thrombosis-pulmonary-embolism-and-stroke-or-transient-ischemic-attack/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/superior-sensitivity-for-detection-of-primary-antiphospholipid-syndrome-by-a-9-test-panel-in-patients-with-deep-venous-thrombosis-pulmonary-embolism-and-stroke-or-transient-ischemic-attack/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology