ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1815

Subcutaneous or Intravenous Abatacept Monotherapy in Pediatric Patients with Polyarticular-Course JIA: Results from Two Phase III Trials

Nicolino Ruperto1, Daniel J. Lovell 2, John Bohnsack 3, Johannes Breedt 4, Michel Fischbach 5, Thomas Lutz 6, Kirsten Minden 7, Tatiana Miraval 8, Mahmood M. T. M. Ally 9, Nadina Rubio-Pérez 10, Elisabeth Gervais 11, Riana van Zyl 12, Robert Wong 13, Marleen Nys 14, Alberto Martini 15 and Hermine Brunner 16, 1Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation (PRINTO), Genoa, Italy, 2Pediatric Rheumatology Collaborative Study Group (PRCSG), Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, 3University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, 4Steve Biko Academic Hospital, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa, 5Pédiatrie 1, CHU Hautepierre, Strasbourg, France, 6Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany, 7German Rheumatism Research Center and Charité University Medicine, Berlin, Germany, 8Clínica San Gabriel, Lima, Peru, 9University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa, 10University Hospital Dr. José Eleuterio González, Monterrey, Mexico, 11CHU de Poitiers, Rheumatology, Poitiers, France, 12University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa, 13Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, 14Bristol-Myers Squibb, Braine L’Alleud, Belgium, 15IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Università degli Studi di Genova, Genova, Italy, 16Pediatric Rheumatology Collaborative Study Group (PRCSG), Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Abatacept, Biologics, DMARDs, pediatric rheumatology and juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 11, 2019

Title: 4M092: Pediatric Rheumatology – Clinical II: JIA (1812–1817)

Session Type: ACR Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:30PM-4:00PM

Background/Purpose: In EU, abatacept (ABA) with MTX is approved in patients (pts) with polyarticular-course JIA (pJIA), as young as 2 years (SC) and 6 years (IV), intolerant or with an inadequate response to prior DMARDs, and can be used as monotherapy if MTX use is inappropriate.1 In US, ABA can be used in combination with MTX or as monotherapy.2 Here we report ABA efficacy and safety in pts without concomitant MTX or in pts with prior biologic use treated in an open-label, Phase III study of SC ABA (NCT01844518) and in a double-blind, Phase III study of IV ABA (NCT00095173).

Methods: Study design and eligibility criteria for both studies were reported previously.3,4 In SC study, pts with pJIA and prior DMARD failure/intolerance were stratified by age cohort (2–5 and 6–17 years) to receive weight-tiered SC ABA (10 to < 25 kg [50 mg], 25 to < 50 kg [87.5 mg], ≥50 kg [125 mg]) weekly for 4 months (primary endpoint). JIA-ACR30 criteria responders at Month 4 could receive SC ABA for another 20 months.3 In IV study, pts with pJIA and prior DMARD failure/intolerance received open-label IV ABA (10 mg/kg body weight) for 4 months (Period A); JIA-ACR30 criteria responders at Month 4 were randomized 1:1 to receive IV ABA (10 mg/kg body weight) or placebo every 4 weeks for 6 months or until flare (Period B). Pts could receive open-label ABA in a 5-year follow-up (Period C).4 In this analysis, data were evaluated descriptively.

Results: Baseline characteristics were mostly balanced between the arms in both studies (Table 1). No additional numerical benefit in JIA-ACR responses was seen with ABA+MTX versus ABA monotherapy in either study at Month 4 (JIA-ACR90: SC ABA+MTX, 34.7% [60/173] vs SC ABA, 34.8% [16/46]; IV ABA+MTX, 12.3% [17/138] vs IV ABA, 13.5% [7/52]). Flare rates (95% CI) were comparable with ABA+MTX and ABA monotherapy in Period B of the IV study: 18.8% (7.7, 29.8) and 25.0% (0.5, 49.5), respectively. Efficacy responses of ABA+MTX and ABA monotherapy-treated JIA-ACR responders with prior MTX intolerance/lack of efficacy at Month 4 were similar in both studies (Table 2). As expected, ABA-treated biologic-naïve pts had a numerically greater clinical response than those with prior biologic use at Month 4 in both trials (Table 3); effect was independent of concomitant MTX use (data not shown). Rates of reported AEs were comparable for ABA+MTX- versus ABA-treated pts and for biologic-naïve versus those with prior biologic use across studies over 4 months (Tables 2, 3). No anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) were reported with ABA monotherapy in SC study; few pts receiving ABA monotherapy in IV study developed ADAs, with no impact on ABA efficacy seen (data not shown).

Conclusion: Abatacept (SC and IV) monotherapy was effective and well tolerated in pts with pJIA intolerant to MTX or when prior MTX was not effective. In addition, abatacept monotherapy can be considered for use in those with prior biologic therapy if MTX use is inappropriate.

References:

  1. Orencia [SmPC]. Princeton, NJ: Bristol-Myers Squibb; 2019.
  2. Orencia [prescribing information]. Princeton, NJ: Bristol-Myers Squibb; 2019.
  3. Brunner HI, et al. Arthritis Rheumatol 2018;70:1144–54.
  4. Ruperto N, et al. Lancet 2008;372:383–91.

Writing support: Katerina Kumpan, Caudex, funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb


Disclosure: N. Ruperto, AbbVie, 5, 8, Abbvie, 8, Ablynx, 5, 8, Ablynx, AbbVie, Astrazeneca-Medimmune, Biogen, Boehringer, Bristol Myers and Squibb, Eli-Lilly, EMD Serono, Glaxo Smith and Kline, 8, AstraZeneca-Medimmune, 8, Astrazeneca-Medimmune, 8, AstraZeneca-MedImmune, 5, 8, Biogen, 5, 8, BMS, Eli-Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, F Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sobi., 2, Boehringer, 8, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, 8, Boeringher Ingelheim, 8, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 8, Eli-Lilly, 8, EMD Serono, 5, 8, F Hoffmann-La Roche, 2, 5, 8, GlaxoSmithKline, 2, 5, 8, Hoffmann-La Roche, 8, Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, R-Pharma, SanofiServier, Sinergie, Sobi and Takeda, 8, Janssen, 2, 5, 8, Merck, 5, 8, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer, 2, 5, 8, R-Pharma, 5, 8, SanofiServier, 5, 8, Sinergie, 5, 8, Sobi, 2, 5, 8, 9, Takeda, 5, 8; D. Lovell, Abbott, 5, 9, AbbVie, 5, 9, Amgen, 5, 9, AstraZeneca, 5, Astra-Zeneca Pharm, 5, Biogen, 5, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, Boeringher Ingelheim, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5, 9, Celgene, 5, Forest Research, 9, Forest Research Institute, 5, Genentech, 5, 8, GlaxoSmithKline, 5, Hoffmann-La Roche, 5, 9, Horizon, 5, Jannsen, 5, Janssen, 5, 9, Johnson & Johnson, 5, Novartis, 5, 9, Pfizer, 5, 9, Roche, 5, 9, Takeda, 5, 9, UBC, 5, Wyeth Pharm, 5, 8; J. Bohnsack, AbbVie, 2, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, Janssen, 2, Pfizer, 2, Roche, 2; J. Breedt, None; M. Fischbach, None; T. Lutz, MSD, 8; K. Minden, AbbVie, 8, Abbvie, 8, German Arthritis Foundation, 2, GlaxoSmithKline, 5, GSK, 5, Sanofi, 8; T. Miraval, None; M. Ally, None; N. Rubio-Pérez, AbbVie, 8, Roche, 8; E. Gervais, None; R. van Zyl, None; R. Wong, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 3, 4; M. Nys, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 1, 3; A. Martini, EMD Serono, 5, 8, EMD-Serono, 5, 8, Janssen, 5, 8, Novartis, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, 8; H. Brunner, ., 2, 5, 8, AbbVie, 5, AstraZeneca, 5, Bayer, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, EMD Serono, 5, Genentech, 2, 5, 8, GlaxoSmithKline, 5, Janssen, 5, Lilly, 5, Novartis, 5, 8, Pfizer, 2, 5, R-Pharm, 5, Sanofi, 5, UCB, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Ruperto N, Lovell D, Bohnsack J, Breedt J, Fischbach M, Lutz T, Minden K, Miraval T, Ally M, Rubio-Pérez N, Gervais E, van Zyl R, Wong R, Nys M, Martini A, Brunner H. Subcutaneous or Intravenous Abatacept Monotherapy in Pediatric Patients with Polyarticular-Course JIA: Results from Two Phase III Trials [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/subcutaneous-or-intravenous-abatacept-monotherapy-in-pediatric-patients-with-polyarticular-course-jia-results-from-two-phase-iii-trials/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/subcutaneous-or-intravenous-abatacept-monotherapy-in-pediatric-patients-with-polyarticular-course-jia-results-from-two-phase-iii-trials/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology