ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1782

Subclinical Myocarditis in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients without Cardiovascular Disease

Laura Geraldino-Pardilla1, Thania Perez2, Sabahat Bokhari3, Joan Bathon4 and Anca D. Askanase5, 1Division of Rheumatology, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, NY, 2Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, NY, 3Cardiology, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, NY, NY, 4Rheumatology, Columbia University, College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, NY, 5Department of Medicine, Rheumatology, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, NY

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Cardiovascular disease, myocardial involvement and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2016

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Clinical Aspects and Treatment - Poster II: Damage Accrual and Quality of Life

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose : Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains a leading cause of death in SLE. Lupus patients have a 2-3 fold increased risk to develop heart failure compared with matched controls. Both traditional CVD risk factors and SLE itself play an important role in its development and associated excess deaths. Interest has emerged to study potential underlying mechanisms such as the presence of myocardial inflammation in attempts for early intervention when warranted. This study was initiated to evaluate the prevalence of myocardial inflammation in SLE using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT), and the association of FDG uptake with disease characteristics in SLE patients without clinical CVD.

Methods: Patients <45 years old in the Columbia University Lupus Cohort without clinical evidence of CVD, history of antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, or cardiac related symptoms were invited to participate.  All patients met the 1997 ACR SLE Classification criteria.  Ten SLE patients underwent cardiac FDG-PET/CT imaging for evaluation of myocarditis by standardized methods. Demographics, SLE-specific characteristics, and CVD risk factors were ascertained. Coronary artery disease was evaluated by the Agatston coronary artery calcium score. The prevalence of myocarditis and its association with SLE-disease characteristics and conventional CVD risk factors was evaluated.

Results: Table 1 depicts the patient characteristics. The mean age was 33±7 years, 80% were female, 80% Hispanic and 20% were non-Hispanic Black. The median SLEDAI-2K and SLICC SDI scores were 2 (1-4) and 0 (0-0), respectively. Median SLE disease duration was 11 years (7-15). None of the patients had hypertension, diabetes, or smoked. Non-specific ST-T abnormalities were seen in 50% of the patients. The mean ejection fraction was 64±4%. Three of the ten patients (30%) had increased FDG myocardial uptake, with a diffuse pattern noted in all (Figure 1).  No SLE-specific characteristics were associated with this outcome (Table 1).

Conclusion: This pilot study shows that myocarditis, identified by myocardial FDG-PET uptake, is prevalent in SLE patients without clinical CVD despite low disease activity. This supports the use of FDG-PET/CT imaging in the diagnosis of myocarditis in SLE and to further evaluate the prevalence of myocardial involvement in lupus.     Table 1. Patient Characteristics and Cardiovascular diagnostic tests (n=10).

 

Total

(n=10)

Myocarditis

(n= 3)

No Myocarditis

(n= 7)

p-value

Age, years, mean ± SD           

33 ± 7

33 ± 2

33 ± 8

0.97

Female, n (%)

8 (80%)

2 (66%)

6 (86%)

1.0

Race/Ethnicity

 

 

 

 

   Non-Hispanic White, n (%)

0

0

0

1.0

   Non-Hispanic Black, n (%)

2 (20%)

0

2 (28%)

1.0

   Hispanic, n (%)

8 (80%)

3 (100%)

5 (62%)

0.47

           

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SLE duration, years, median (IQR)

11 (7-15)

10 (2-15)

12 (7-16)

0.58

ANA, n (%)

10 (100%)

3 (100%)

7(100%)

1.0

Anti-ds-DNA, n (%)

6 (60%)

1 (33%)

5 (71%)

0.5

Anti-ds-DNA titer, median (IQR)

56 (17-116)

21 (7-193)

77 (17-116)

0.66

SSA, n (%)

5 (50%)

2 (67%)

3 (43%)

1.0

SSB, n (%)

3 (30%)

0

3 (43%)

0.47

Lupus anticoagulant, n (%)

1 (10%)

0

1 (14%)

1.0

Anti-cardiolipin IgG/M, n (%)

0

0

0

1.0

Anti-b2-glycoprotein-1, n (%)

0

0

0

1.0

 

 

 

 

 

C3, mean ± SD

97 ± 32

101 ± 57

96 ± 21

0.89

C4, median (IQR)

14 (11-26)

15 (8-32)

14 (11-36)

1.0

SLEDAI-2K, median (IQR)

2 (1-4)

2 (2-4)

2 (0-5)

0.91

SLICC, median (IQR)

0 (0-0)

0 (0-0)

0 (0-2)

0.41

CRP, median (IQR)

0.9 (0.7-3.1)

2 (0.7-3.1)

0.9 (0.5-3.9)

0.82

ESR, median (IQR)

24 (11-36)

22 (8-36)

24 (11-57)

0.88

Current prednisone, n (%)

4 (40%)

1 (33%)

3 (43%)

1.0

Antimalarials, n (%)

8 (80%)

2 (67%)

6 (86%)

1.0

Azathioprine, n (%)

1 (10%)

0

1 (17%)

1.0

Mycophenolate mofetil, n (%)

4 (40%)

1 (33%)

3 (43%)

1.0

 

 

 

 

 

Current smoking, n (%)

0

0

0

1.0

Hypertension, n (%)

0

0

0

1.0

   SBP, mean ± SD

114 ± 10

111 ± 13

115 ± 9

0.57

   DBP, mean ± SD

73 ±11

72 ± 15

74 ± 10

0.85

Diabetes, n (%)

0

0

0

1.0

Total Cholesterol, mean ± SD

167 ± 44

184 ± 82

159 ± 20

0.65

LDL, mean ± SD

99 ± 39

112 ± 77

93 ± 14

0.70

HDL, mean ± SD

53 ± 11

57 ± 12

51 ± 12

0.49

Triglycerides, median (IQR)

67 (48-78)

74 (64-86)

52 (48-78)

0.38

Elevated Troponins, n (%)

0

0

0

1.0

Statin use, n (%)

1 (10%)

1 (33%)

0

0.3

EKG Non-specific ST-T changes, n (%)

5 (50%)

2 (67%)

3 (43%)

1.0

EKG QTc duration (ms), mean ± SD

420 ±25

423 ± 11

419 ± 31

0.83

Heart Rate, mean ± SD

76 ± 7

72 ± 12

77 ±4

0.55

 

 

 

 

 

CAC score, median (IQR)

0 (0-0)

0 (0-17)

0 (0-0)

0.22

EF (%), mean ± SD

64 ± 4

64 ± 7

65 ± 2

0.90

Diffuse Myocarditis, n (%)

3 (30%)

3 (100%)

–

–

Focal Myocarditis, n (%)

0

0

–

–

Figure 1. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography showing diffuse myocardial FDG uptake.


Disclosure: L. Geraldino-Pardilla, None; T. Perez, None; S. Bokhari, None; J. Bathon, None; A. D. Askanase, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Geraldino-Pardilla L, Perez T, Bokhari S, Bathon J, Askanase AD. Subclinical Myocarditis in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients without Cardiovascular Disease [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/subclinical-myocarditis-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-patients-without-cardiovascular-disease/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/subclinical-myocarditis-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-patients-without-cardiovascular-disease/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology