ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 376

Strategies for Use of Prednisolone in Rheumatoid Arthritis Have Changed Over the Past Decade: Data From the NOR-DMARD Register

Anna-Birgitte Aga1, Elisabeth Lie2, Till Uhlig2, Tore K. Kvien2 and Espen A. Haavardsholm3, 1Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway, 2Dept. of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway, 3Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: prednisolone, prednisone and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Clinical Aspects I: Drug Studies/Drug Safety/Drug Utilization/Disease Activity & Remission

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Focus on early aggressive treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has increased during the past decade. There is evidence for the efficacy of prednisolone as bridging therapy awaiting the therapeutic effect of DMARDs as well as evidence for a disease-modifying effect of glucocorticoids. Our objective was to investigate pattern in prednisolone use in RA patients in the past decade.

Methods: Data for this study were provided by the NOR-DMARD register, including adult patients with inflammatory arthropathies starting a new DMARD regimen at 5 Norwegian centers. These analyses included Methotrexate (MTX) naïve RA patients starting MTX mono and biologics naïve RA patients starting TNF inhibitor (TNFi) + MTX between 2000 and 2010. Each group was divided into 2-year intervals according to date of treatment start. The proportion using prednisolone, and mean prednisolone doses at baseline and at 6 months were assessed. Comparisons between first vs. last time period were made by Chi2-test and two-sample t-test. Possible linear effects of time were assessed by logistic and linear regression with year of treatment start as a continuous variable. 6-month DAS28 remission rates were calculated.

Results: 2573 pts were included – MTX mono n=1866 [70% female, 62% RF+, mean (SD) age 56.0 (13.7) years, time from diagnosis 3.6 (7.7) years] and TNFi+MTX n=707 [70% female, 75% RF+, age 52.1 (13.2) years, time from diagnosis 9.1 (9.3) years]. In patients starting MTX mono the proportion of patients using prednisolone at baseline increased over the years, while the proportion still using prednisolone at 6 months decreased (table). The differences between the first and the last period were statistically significant, but the effect of time was not linear. In the TNFi+MTX group the proportion of patients using prednisolone at baseline was stable during the decade, but the proportion at 6 months was significantly lower in the last vs. the first time period. The mean doses of prednisolone were stable throughout the decade in both groups. Proportions of patients reaching 6-month DAS28 remission increased gradually over the years in both groups (table).

 

Proportion of patients on prednisolone [%(n)]

2000-2002

2003-2004

2005-2006

2007-2008

2009-2010

p-value*

MTX mono (n=1866)

Baseline [%(n)]

49.0 (172)

44.7 (207)

45.9 (181)

62.3 (223)

60.7 (182)

 0.003

6 month [%(n)]

32.5 (114)

29.4 (136)

30.2 (119)

35.2 (126)

21.7 (65)

 0.002

TNFi+MTX (n=707)

Baseline [%(n)]

56.5 (48)

51.1 (94)

48.3 (69)

49.4 (79)

49.6 (67)

 0.32

6 month [%(n)]

35.3 (30)

26.1 (48)

28.0 (40)

28.8 (46)

14.8 (20)

<0.001

Prednisolone dose mg/day [mean(SD)]

 

 

 

 

 

p-value**

MTX mono (n=1866)

Baseline[mean(SD)]

8.9 (3.6)

9.1 (4.5)

8.9 (4.0)

8.9 (3.7)

9.2 (4.1)

0.37

6 month [mean(SD)]

6.0 (2.8)

5.6 (2.5)

5.7 (3.2)

5.4 (2.5)

5.6 (2.7)

0.44

TNFi+MTX (n=707)

Baseline[mean(SD)]

8.0 (3.4)

7.2 (3.0)

7.5 (3.3)

7.9 (4.9)

7.1 (3.6)

0.17

6 month [mean(SD)]

5.8 (2.9)

5.5 (2.5)

5.3 (2.4)

5.7 (3.0)

7.6 (12.4)

0.45

DAS28 remission 6 month [%(n)]

 

 

 

 

 

p-value*

MTX mono (n=1866)

6 month [%(n)]

17.8 (43)

29.2 (95)

33.7 (89)

38.1 (80)

37.6 (44)

<0.001

TNFi+MTX (n=707)

6 month [%(n)]

16.9 (10)

29.3 (36)

34.5 (38)

31.4 (27)

46.3 (25)

0.003

* chi2 –test first vs. last period, ** two sample t-test first vs. last period.

Conclusion: A higher proportion of RA patients used prednisolone when starting MTX in the recent years, and an increasing proportion of patients tapered and discontinued prednisolone. The observed increases in DAS28 remission rates likely reflects the implementation of modern DMARD treatment strategies including treatment earlier in the disease course and at lower levels of disease activity, but the changes in the use of prednisolone may be a contributing factor.

 


Disclosure:

A. B. Aga,
None;

E. Lie,

Roche Pharmaceuticals,

5,

Pfizer Inc,

8;

T. Uhlig,
None;

T. K. Kvien,

Abbott Immunology Pharmaceuticals,

8,

AstraZeneca,

8,

Merck Pharmaceuticals,

8,

NiCox, S.A.,

8,

Pfizer Inc,

8,

Roche Pharmaceuticals,

8,

UCB,

8,

BMS,

5,

Abbott Immunology Pharmaceuticals,

5,

Merck Pharmaceuticals,

5,

NiCox, S.A.,

5,

Pfizer Inc,

5,

Roche Pharmaceuticals,

5,

UCB,

5;

E. A. Haavardsholm,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/strategies-for-use-of-prednisolone-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-have-changed-over-the-past-decade-data-from-the-nor-dmard-register/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology